| Literature DB >> 33230950 |
Atefe Ghamar Talepoor1, Shahdad Khosropanah2, Mehrnoosh Doroudchi1.
Abstract
Frequencies of circulating T follicular helper (cTfh) functional subsets vary in autoimmune diseases. We evaluated the frequencies and clinical relevance of functional subsets of cTfhs in patients with different degrees of stenosis. Blood samples were collected from high (≥50%) (n = 12) and low (<50%) stenosis (n = 12) groups and healthy controls (n = 6). Three subsets of cTfh cells including cTfh1 (CXCR3+ CCR6- ), cTfh2 (CXCR3- CCX6- ), and cTfh17 (CXCR3- CCR6+ ) were detected by flow cytometry. The frequency of cTfh1 cells was higher in control (p = .0006) and low-stenosis groups (p = .005) compared to high-stenosis group. The percentages of cTfh2 and cTfh17 cells were increased in high-stenosis compared to low-stenosis (p = .002 and p = .007) and control groups (p = .0004 and p = .0005), respectively. The frequency of cTfh1 cells negatively correlated with cholesterol (p = .040; r = -.44), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = .015; r = -.68), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p = .002; r = -.79), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = .028; r = -.67), and cTfh17 (p = .017; r = -.7244) in the high-stenosis group. The percentages of cTfh2 and cTfh17 cells positively correlated with cholesterol (p = .025; r = .77 and p = .033; r = .71), CRP (p = .030; r = .61 and p = .020; r = .73), ESR (p = .027; r = .69 and p = .029; r = .70), NLR (p = .004; r = .76 and p = .005; r = .74), and with each other (p = .022; r = .7382), respectively, in the high-stenosis group. The increased frequencies of cTfh2 and cTfh17 subsets and their correlation with laboratory parameters in patients with atherosclerosis may suggest their role in promoting the inflammatory response and atherosclerosis progression.Entities:
Keywords: NLR; cTfh1; cTfh17; cTfh2; stenosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33230950 PMCID: PMC7683878 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1The frequencies of cTfh cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Gating strategy to detect CD3+CD4+CXCR5+T, cTfh1, cTfh2, and cTfh17 in all groups. (b) The frequencies of CD3+CD4+CXCR5+cells, (c) CD3+CD4+CXCR5+CXCR3+CCR6‐cTfh1 cells, (d) CD3+CD4+CXCR5+CXCR3‐CCR6‐cTfh2 cells, (e) CD3+CD4+CXCR5+CXCR3‐CCR6+cTfh17 cells, (f) CD3+CD4+CXCR5+CXCR3+CCR6+cTfh cells, and (g) ratio of cTfh2 + cTfh17/cTfh1. Each symbol represents an individual; mean are represented by horizontal lines. **p < .01, ***p < .001; Data analysis using the Kruskal‐Wallis test followed by Bonferroni. The results were also evaluated by comparing the raw cell counts and the significance of comparisons stayed valid for all but one analysis with regard to cTfh2 + cTfh17/cTfh1 ratio which became borderline after Bonferroni correction (p = .045)
Correlation of laboratory parameters with cTfh cell subsets in all study groups
| Parameters | cTfh1 | cTfh2 | cTfh17 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Healthy controls | ||||||
| Cholesterol | −.48 |
| .15 | .62 | .29 | .45 |
| CRP | −.12 | .87 | .19 | . 97 | .26 | .52 |
| ESR | −.45 |
| .15 | .87 | .26 | .57 |
| NLR | −.10 | .72 | .26 | .74 | .58 |
|
| Stenosis < 50% | ||||||
| Cholesterol | −.22 | .58 | .30 | .75 | .12 | .95 |
| CRP | −.45 |
| .47 | .77 | .24 | .72 |
| ESR | −.12 | .83 | .11 | .94 | .34 | .77 |
| NLR | −.38 | .63 | .61 |
| .56 |
|
| Stenosis ≥ 50% | ||||||
| Cholesterol | −.44 |
| .77 |
| .71 |
|
| CRP | −.68 |
| .61 |
| .73 |
|
| ESR | −.79 |
| .69 |
| .70 |
|
| NLR | −.67 |
| .76 |
| .74 |
|
| Stenosis‐positive groups | ||||||
| Cholesterol | −.44 |
| .52 |
| .73 |
|
| CRP | −.63 |
| .49 |
| .65 |
|
| ESR | −.77 |
| .72 |
| .82 |
|
| NLR | −.75 |
| .73 |
| .84 |
|
Data shown are “r value” and “p value”. Bold values show the significant correlations at the .05 level.
CRP, C‐reactive protein; cTfh, circulating follicular helper T cells; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; NLR, neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 2Correlation of laboratoryparameters with the cTfh1, cTfh2, and cTfh17 cells in all study groups. (a) Heatmap correlation of cholesterol, CRP, ESR, and NLR with cTfh1, cTfh2, and cTfh17 cells in healthy controls; (b) Heatmap correlation of cholesterol, CRP, ESR, and NLR with cTfh1, cTfh2, and cTfh17 cells in low‐stenosis group; (c) Heatmap correlation of cholesterol, CRP, ESR, and NLR with cTfh1, cTfh2, and cTfh17 cells in patients with high stenosis and (d) Heatmap correlation of cholesterol, CRP, ESR, and NLR with cTfh1, cTfh2, and cTfh17 cells in stenosis‐positive group (Red: positive correlation, blue: negative correlation). The P‐value and r are determined according to Spearman's rank correlation test
Figure 3The correlation between cTfh cell subsets in all study groups. (a‐c) Correlation of cTfh1 with cTfh2 cells; (d‐f) Correlation of cTfh1 with cTfh17 cells; and (g‐i) Correlation of cTfh2 and cTfh17 cells.p < .05 was considering significant; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test