Meital Oren-Shabtai1,2, Noa Kremer3,4, Moshe Lapidoth3,4, Eran Sharon4,5, Lihi Atzmony3,4, Adi Nosrati3,4, Emmilia Hodak3,4, Daniel Mimouni3,4, Assi Levi3,4. 1. Division of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St., 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel. meital.oren@gmail.com. 2. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. meital.oren@gmail.com. 3. Division of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St., 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel. 4. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 5. Department of Surgery, Breast Surgery Clinic, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid commonly affects older adults and has a detrimental effect on both quality of life and longevity. Systemic corticosteroids, the mainstay of therapy, may cause significant adverse effects, especially in older patients. Therefore, safer therapeutic options are being sought. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to systematically review the published evidence on the efficacy and safety of different treatment modalities for bullous pemphigoid in older patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all publications until May 2020 in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ongoing trials registry of the US National Institutes of Health databases evaluating the efficacy and safety of bullous pemphigoid treatments in patients aged older than 80 years. The primary outcome was complete response. The secondary outcomes were partial response, complete remission on minimal therapy or during tapering, recurrence, adverse events, and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-eight publications were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 11 case series, with a total of 153 older patients. The overall complete response rate was 31%. Topical corticosteroids had the highest complete response rate (55%) with a low side-effect profile. Biologics (omalizumab and rituximab) were effective in achieving complete remission on minimal therapy (29%) without recurrence, although rituximab was associated with a relatively high mortality rate (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Current data suggest that topical corticosteroids are effective and safe and should remain the first line of treatment for bullous pemphigoid in older adults. However, their application is difficult and requires a high-functioning patient, third-party assistance, or a relatively mild disease. Biological agents are effective but warrant meticulous patient selection owing to the relatively high mortality rate associated with rituximab. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020186686.
BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid commonly affects older adults and has a detrimental effect on both quality of life and longevity. Systemic corticosteroids, the mainstay of therapy, may cause significant adverse effects, especially in older patients. Therefore, safer therapeutic options are being sought. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to systematically review the published evidence on the efficacy and safety of different treatment modalities for bullous pemphigoid in older patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all publications until May 2020 in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ongoing trials registry of the US National Institutes of Health databases evaluating the efficacy and safety of bullous pemphigoid treatments in patients aged older than 80 years. The primary outcome was complete response. The secondary outcomes were partial response, complete remission on minimal therapy or during tapering, recurrence, adverse events, and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-eight publications were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 11 case series, with a total of 153 older patients. The overall complete response rate was 31%. Topical corticosteroids had the highest complete response rate (55%) with a low side-effect profile. Biologics (omalizumab and rituximab) were effective in achieving complete remission on minimal therapy (29%) without recurrence, although rituximab was associated with a relatively high mortality rate (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Current data suggest that topical corticosteroids are effective and safe and should remain the first line of treatment for bullous pemphigoid in older adults. However, their application is difficult and requires a high-functioning patient, third-party assistance, or a relatively mild disease. Biological agents are effective but warrant meticulous patient selection owing to the relatively high mortality rate associated with rituximab. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020186686.
Authors: G Marazza; H C Pham; L Schärer; P P Pedrazzetti; T Hunziker; R M Trüeb; D Hohl; P Itin; S Lautenschlager; L Naldi; L Borradori Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 9.302