Syed Ehtasham Junaid1, Anil Haldar2, Raul Colta2, Karan Malhotra2, Kar Ho Brian Lee3, Matthew Welck2, Asif Saifuddin4. 1. Department of Imaging, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, England. junaids@pm.me. 2. Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, England. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Yau Ma Tei, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 4. Department of Imaging, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, England.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hindfoot malalignment is a relatively common clinical finding and several studies have suggested that hindfoot valgus can be identified on non-weight-bearing ankle MRI. The aim of this study was to determine the awareness of hindfoot malalignment on ankle MRI amongst consultant musculoskeletal radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All MRI studies referred by Foot and Ankle Unit Consultants reported by one of 14 consultant musculoskeletal radiologists between March 2016 and August 2019 were retrieved from the Hospital Radiology Information System. These were reviewed independently by a radiology fellow and a consultant radiologist. Tibiocalcaneal angle (TCA) was measured, and extra-articular talocalcaneal (EA-TCI) and calcaneofibular impingement (EA-CFI) were recorded. Radiology reports were then analysed for mention of hindfoot malalignment and the presence of EA-TCI and EA-CFI. RESULTS: The study group comprised 129 patients, 46 males and 83 females with a mean age of 46.8 years (range 8-84 years). Based on review, hindfoot valgus was present in 78-80 cases (60.5-62%), EA-TCI in 30-36 cases (23.2-27.9%) and EA-CFI in 18-21 cases (14-16.3%). By comparison, MRI reports mentioned hindfoot valgus in 18 cases (2 incorrectly), EA-TCI in 8 cases (1 incorrectly) and EA-CFI in 10 cases (1 incorrectly). CONCLUSION: Hindfoot valgus, EA-TCI and EA-CFI were present relatively commonly on review of ankle MRI studies in patients referred from a specialist Foot and Ankle Unit but were commonly under-reported highlighting a relative lack of awareness of hindfoot malalignment on ankle MRI amongst musculoskeletal radiologists, which could impact negatively on patient management.
OBJECTIVE: Hindfoot malalignment is a relatively common clinical finding and several studies have suggested that hindfoot valgus can be identified on non-weight-bearing ankle MRI. The aim of this study was to determine the awareness of hindfoot malalignment on ankle MRI amongst consultant musculoskeletal radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All MRI studies referred by Foot and Ankle Unit Consultants reported by one of 14 consultant musculoskeletal radiologists between March 2016 and August 2019 were retrieved from the Hospital Radiology Information System. These were reviewed independently by a radiology fellow and a consultant radiologist. Tibiocalcaneal angle (TCA) was measured, and extra-articular talocalcaneal (EA-TCI) and calcaneofibular impingement (EA-CFI) were recorded. Radiology reports were then analysed for mention of hindfoot malalignment and the presence of EA-TCI and EA-CFI. RESULTS: The study group comprised 129 patients, 46 males and 83 females with a mean age of 46.8 years (range 8-84 years). Based on review, hindfoot valgus was present in 78-80 cases (60.5-62%), EA-TCI in 30-36 cases (23.2-27.9%) and EA-CFI in 18-21 cases (14-16.3%). By comparison, MRI reports mentioned hindfoot valgus in 18 cases (2 incorrectly), EA-TCI in 8 cases (1 incorrectly) and EA-CFI in 10 cases (1 incorrectly). CONCLUSION: Hindfoot valgus, EA-TCI and EA-CFI were present relatively commonly on review of ankle MRI studies in patients referred from a specialist Foot and Ankle Unit but were commonly under-reported highlighting a relative lack of awareness of hindfoot malalignment on ankle MRI amongst musculoskeletal radiologists, which could impact negatively on patient management.