Literature DB >> 33230500

Comparison of stroke care parameters in acute ischemic stroke patients with and without concurrent Covid-19. A Nationwide analysis.

Daniel Richter1, Christos Krogias1,2, Jens Eyding2,3, Dirk Bartig1, Armin Grau4, Ralph Weber2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparing health care parameters of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with and without concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 infection), may be helpful in terms of optimizing clinical and public health care during pandemic.
METHODS: We evaluated a nationwide administrative database of all hospitalized patients with main diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke with/without diagnosis of Covid-19 who were hospitalized during the time period from January 16th to May 15th, 2020. Data from a total of 1463 hospitals in Germany were included. We compared case numbers, treatment characteristics (intravenous thrombolysis, IVT; mechanical thrombectomy, MT; treated on an intensive care unit, stroke unit or regular ward) and in-hospital mortality of AIS with and without concurrent diagnosis of Covid-19.
RESULTS: From a total of 30,864 hospitalized Covid-19 patients during the evaluation period in Germany, we identified a subgroup of 213 patients with primary diagnosis of AIS. Compared to the 68,700 AIS patients without Covid-19, this subgroup showed a similar rate of IVT (16.4% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.985) but a significantly lower rate of MT (3.8% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.017). In-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with AIS and concurrent Covid-19 compared to non-infected AIS patients (22.5% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: These nationwide data point out differences in mortality and medical treatment regime between AIS patients with and without concurrent Covid-19. Since the pandemic is still ongoing, these data draw attention to AIS as a less frequent but often fatal comorbidity in Covid-19 patients.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covid-19; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33230500      PMCID: PMC7675387          DOI: 10.1186/s42466-020-00095-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res Pract        ISSN: 2524-3489


To the editor It is assumed that patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 infection) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are treated and monitored differently, although these patients may have a higher risk of stroke compared to patients with other viral infections such as influenza [1]. To evaluate parameters of acute stroke care for Covid-19 patients with AIS, we analyzed nationwide treatment rates for Germany and in-hospital mortality in these patients for the time period January 16th to May 15th, 2020. Case numbers and treatment characteristics of all hospital admissions of AIS (ICD I63) with and without a concurrent diagnosis of Covid-19 (ICD U07.1) were analyzed using the high-quality and validated administrative diagnosis related group database [2] which is relevant for reimbursement of inpatient treatment cost. Statistical differences in categorical or continuous variables between patients were calculated using chi-squared test (χ2) or t-test, respectively. A total of 30,864 patients with Covid-19 were hospitalized in Germany between January 16th and May 15th, 2020. We identified a subgroup of 213 patients with the combination of a primary diagnosis of AIS and secondary diagnosis of Covid-19 compared to 68,700 non-infected AIS cases during the same time period. The mean age of AIS patients with Covid-19 was non-significantly higher as compared to non-infected AIS patients (76.1 ± 20.0 y vs. 74.0 ± 19.0 y; p = 0.107), and there was no difference in gender distribution (F/M: 46.7%/53.3% vs. 47.2%/52.8%; p = 0.833). In-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with AIS and concurrent Covid-19 compared to non-infected AIS patients (22.5% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001; Fig. 1). Those patients, who were treated on an intensive care unit, had the highest in-hospital mortality rate (42.9%) compared to patients treated on a stroke unit (15.8%; p = 0.001) or on a regular ward (25.7%; p = 0.064). Furthermore, we identified 172 patients admitted with Covid-19 and concurrent coding of AIS as secondary diagnosis, implicating that the AIS occurred during hospitalization due to Covid-19. In-hospital mortality rate in this subgroup was 49.4% (85/172). Thus, total in-hospital mortality of patients with concurrent Covid-19 and AIS (primary or secondary diagnosis) was 34.5%. Yaghi et al. [3] reported a mortality rate of 63.6% in AIS patients with concurrent Covid-19 in New York, which is substantially higher compared to the mortality rate of those patients in our study. The difference between nationwide data and data from selected tertiary care hospitals might explain the discrepancy in the observed mortality rates.
Fig. 1

Clinical Characteristics of AIS patients with and without Covid-19. Comparison of treatment rates and in-hospital mortality given in % of patients with primary diagnosis of AIS with and without concurrent Covid-19. Abbreviations: SU = stroke unit; ICU = intensive care unit; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis, MT = mechanical thrombectomy, AIS = acute ischemic stroke. *p < 0.05 (χ2)

Clinical Characteristics of AIS patients with and without Covid-19. Comparison of treatment rates and in-hospital mortality given in % of patients with primary diagnosis of AIS with and without concurrent Covid-19. Abbreviations: SU = stroke unit; ICU = intensive care unit; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis, MT = mechanical thrombectomy, AIS = acute ischemic stroke. *p < 0.05 (χ2) In patients with primary diagnosis of AIS and concurrent Covid-19, the intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) rate was 16.4% and the mechanical thrombectomy (MT) rate was 3.8%. Compared to the treatment rates of AIS patients without Covid-19, the MT rate was significantly lower (3.8% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.017), while the IVT rate did not differ (16.4 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.985; Fig. 1). The study of Yaghi et al. [3] revealed a high rate (45.5%) of large vessel occlusions (LVO) in AIS patients with Covid-19 and a MT rate of 18.8%. Although we are not able to determine the rate of LVO in this nationwide cohort due to missing data from imaging studies, we found a much lower rate for MT in these German AIS patients with concurrent Covid-19 which was also significantly lower as compared to the MT rate in non-infected AIS patients (Fig. 1). Although speculative, since the IVT rates were comparable between stroke patients with and without a concurrent diagnosis of Covid-19, it is unlikely that this finding can be explained by time-depending treatment aspects [4]. It should be noted as a limitation of our analysis, that these administrative data do not provide any information about the severity of symptoms in either AIS or Covid-19. Also, there is no information about testing and allocation strategies in the hospitals which might have varied locally and over time. Cerebrovascular events have been described to occur more frequently in patients with Covid-19 compared to other viral infections such as influenza [1]. We found a total rate of 1.2% for AIS among hospitalized Covid-19 patients, which is slightly lower compared to a recent meta-analysis performed by Tsivgoulis et al. [5] reporting a stroke rate of 1.6% in Covid-19 patients. However, the previously published prevalences are usually based on registry data from some tertiary care hospitals, which usually also serve as reference hospitals for Covid-19 admissions. Again, this might explain the difference to our nationwide analysis which covers data from a total of 1463 hospitals in Germany. In summary, these nationwide data point out differences in mortality and medical treatment regime between AIS patients with and without concurrent Covid-19. Since the pandemic is still ongoing, these data draw attention to AIS as a less frequent but often fatal comorbidity in Covid-19 patients.
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Comparability of different data sources on stroke care in Germany].

Authors:  J Eyding; B Misselwitz; R Weber; T Neumann-Haefelin; D Bartig; Ch Krogias
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vs Patients With Influenza.

Authors:  Alexander E Merkler; Neal S Parikh; Saad Mir; Ajay Gupta; Hooman Kamel; Eaton Lin; Joshua Lantos; Edward J Schenck; Parag Goyal; Samuel S Bruce; Joshua Kahan; Kelsey N Lansdale; Natalie M LeMoss; Santosh B Murthy; Philip E Stieg; Matthew E Fink; Costantino Iadecola; Alan Z Segal; Marika Cusick; Thomas R Campion; Ivan Diaz; Cenai Zhang; Babak B Navi
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  SARS-CoV-2 and Stroke in a New York Healthcare System.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Koto Ishida; Jose Torres; Brian Mac Grory; Eytan Raz; Kelley Humbert; Nils Henninger; Tushar Trivedi; Kaitlyn Lillemoe; Shazia Alam; Matthew Sanger; Sun Kim; Erica Scher; Seena Dehkharghani; Michael Wachs; Omar Tanweer; Frank Volpicelli; Brian Bosworth; Aaron Lord; Jennifer Frontera
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Ischemic Stroke Epidemiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating Uncharted Waters With Changing Tides.

Authors:  Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Raffaele Ornello; Simona Sacco
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency admission for patients with stroke: a time series study in Japan.

Authors:  Takuaki Tani; Shinobu Imai; Kiyohide Fushimi
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-13

2.  Association Between Ischemic Stroke and COVID-19 in China: A Population-Based Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Minghuan Wang; Han Zhang; Yuqin He; Chuan Qin; Xingyuan Liu; Mingqian Liu; Yuhong Tang; Xiaohua Li; Guang Yang; Yingxin Tang; Gang Liang; Shabei Xu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Efficacy and safety of recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zilan Wang; Haiying Teng; Xiaoxiao Wu; Xingyu Yang; Youjia Qiu; Huiru Chen; Zhouqing Chen; Zhong Wang; Gang Chen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Characteristics, Management, and Case-Fatality of Patients Hospitalized for Stroke with a Diagnosis of COVID-19 in France.

Authors:  Amélie Gabet; Clémence Grave; Edouard Chatignoux; Philippe Tuppin; Yannick Béjot; Valérie Olié
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  A full year of the COVID-19 pandemic with two infection waves and its impact on ischemic stroke patient care in Germany.

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Jens Eyding; Ralph Weber; Dirk Bartig; Armin Grau; Werner Hacke; Christos Krogias
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 6.  The Allure of Big Data to Improve Stroke Outcomes: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Muideen T Olaiya; Nita Sodhi-Berry; Lachlan L Dalli; Kiran Bam; Amanda G Thrift; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Lee Nedkoff; Joosup Kim; Monique F Kilkenny
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 7.  Advances in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke from large vessel occlusions.

Authors:  Xu Guo; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2021-07-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.