| Literature DB >> 33230173 |
Shuanglin Liu1, Xiaodong Cheng2, XiaoFei Li1, Yuanfang Kong1, Shiqing Jiang1, Chunhong Dong3, Guoqing Wang4.
Abstract
Catalpol has gained increasing attention for its potential contributions in controlling glycolipid metabolism and diabetic complications, which makes used as a very promising scaffold for seeking new anti-diabetic drug candidates. Acylation derivatives of catalpol crotonate (CCs) were designed as drug ligands of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) based on molecular docking (MD) using Surfex-Docking method. Catalpol hexacrotonate (CC-6) was synthesized using microwave assisted method and characterized by FT-IR, NMR, HPLC and HRMS. The MD results indicate that with the increasing of esterification degree of hydroxyl, the C log P of CCs increased significantly, and the calculated total scores (Total_score) of CCs are all higher than that of catalpol. It shows that CCs maybe served as potential lead compounds for neuroprotective agents. It was found that the maximum Total_score of isomers in one group CCs is often not that the molecule with minimum energy. MD calculations show that there are five hydrogen bonds formed between CC-6 and the surrounding amino acid residues. Molecular dynamics simulation results show that the binding of CC-6 with GSH-Px is stable. CC-6 was screened for SH-SY5Y cells viability by MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, the result indicates CC-6 can effectively reverse SZT induced cells apoptosis with dose-dependent manner, which can indirectly show that CC-6 is a potential neuroprotective agent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33230173 PMCID: PMC7684281 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77399-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Structure of catalpol.
Total_score of CCs docked with GSH-Px and their C log P.
| Numbera | Positionb | Total_score | C log | Positionb | Total_score | C log |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | / | 4.27 | − 4.38 | |||
| 1 | 2′ | 4.33 | − 3.36 | 6′ | 4.42 | − 3.12 |
| 3′ | 6.12 | − 2.68 | 10 c | 4.57 | − 2.46 | |
| 4′ | 5.92 | − 2.68 | 6 | 5.14 | − 2.46 | |
| 2 | 4′, 6′ | 7.55 | − 2.06 | 4′, 10 | 6.96 | − 2.06 |
| 2′, 6′ | 5.37 | − 2.07 | 2′, 3′ | 7.88 | − 1.63 | |
| 3′, 6′ | 5.51 | − 1.42 | 3′, 6 | 4.53 | − 0.77 | |
| 6′, 10 3 | 5.15 | − 1.20 | 3′, 10 | 6.07 | − 1.57 | |
| 6′, 6 | 7.21 | − 1.20 | 2′, 10 | 6.24 | − 1.41 | |
| 3′, 4′ | 6.07 | − 2.28 | 2′, 6 | 6.44 | − 1.41 | |
| 2′, 4′ | 6.59 | − 2.27 | 6, 10 | 5.16 | − 0.55 | |
| 4′, 6 | 5.95 | − 2.06 | ||||
| 3 | 4′, 6′, 10 | 7.12 | − 0.14 | 2′, 4′, 6 | 8.06 | − 0.35 |
| 3′, 4′, 6′ | 8.95 | − 0.36 | 2′, 3′, 4′ | 8.23 | − 0.57 | |
| 2′, 4′, 6′ | 6.57 | − 0.35 | 3′, 4′, 6 | 7.17 | − 0.36 | |
| 4′, 6′, 6 | 7.80 | − 0.14 | 3′, 4′, 10 | 8.51 | − 0.36 | |
| 3′, 6′, 6 | 7.63 | 0.49 | 4′, 6, 10 | 7.38 | − 0.14 | |
| 3′, 6′, 10 | 9.01 | 0.49 | 3′, 6, 10 | 5.74 | 1.15 | |
| 2′, 3′, 6′ | 6.21 | − 0.37 | 2′, 3′, 6 | 7.55 | 0.28 | |
| 2′, 6′, 6 | 5.46 | − 0.15 | 2′, 3′, 10 | 7.29 | 0.28 | |
| 2′, 6′, 10 | 9.70 | − 0.15 | 2′, 6, 10 | 7.08 | 0.50 | |
| 2′, 4′, 10 | 6.92 | − 0.35 | 6′, 6, 10 c | 4.55 | 0.71 | |
| 4 | 2′, 6′, 6, 10 | 7.59 | 1.76 | 2′, 4′, 6, 10 | 8.78 | 1.56 |
| 2′, 3′, 4′, 6′ | 7.67 | 1.34 | 3′, 4′, 6, 10 | 8.02 | 1.02 | |
| 3′, 4′, 6′, 6 | 8.31 | 1.55 | 2′, 3′, 6, 10 | 10.33 | 2.20 | |
| 3′, 4′, 6′, 10 | 8.95 | 1.55 | 2′, 4′, 6′, 6 | 8.10 | 1.56 | |
| 2′, 3′, 6′, 10 | 9.00 | 1.54 | 2′, 4′, 6′, 10 | 9.01 | 1.56 | |
| 2′, 3′, 6′, 6 | 7.73 | 1.54 | 4′, 6′, 6, 10 c | 9.01 | 1.77 | |
| 2′, 3′, 4′, 6 | 8.58 | 1.34 | 3′, 6′, 6, 10 | 8.42 | 2.41 | |
| 2′, 3′, 4′, 10 | 10.19 | 1.34 | ||||
| 5 | 2′, 3′, 6′, 6, 10 | 9.46 | 3.46 | 2′, 4′, 6′, 6, 10 c | 7.43 | 3.48 |
| 2′, 3′, 4′, 6′, 6 | 7.79 | 3.26 | 2′, 3′, 4′, 6, 10 | 10.12 | 3.26 | |
| 2′, 3′, 4′, 6′, 10 | 7.73 | 3.26 | 3′, 4′, 6′, 6, 10 | 8.22 | 3.47 | |
| 6 | 2′, 3′, 4′, 6′, 6, 10 c | 10.26 | 4.65 |
aNumber of crotonylated hydroxyl groups in CCs.
bPositions of crotonylated hydroxyl groups in CCs.
cThe isomer with minimum molecular energy in CCs.
Figure 2Docking diagram of CC-6 and GSH-Px molecule. (a) Docking result of CC-6 with GSH-Px; (b) Interaction of CC-6 with GSH-Px.
Figure 3RMSD analysis of 40 ns molecular dynamic track of the system.
Scheme 1MWAS synthetic route of CCs.
Figure 4FT-IR spectra of catalpol (a) and CC-6 (b).
Figure 5NMR spectra of CC-6. (a) 1H NMR spectrum of CC-6; (b) 13C NMR spectrum of CC-6.
Figure 6HRMS spectra and UPLC diagram on positive ion flow of CC-6.
Figure 7MTT assay for SH-SY5Y cells viability of CC-6.