| Literature DB >> 33229807 |
Hideaki Takahashi1,2, Yasushi Adachi3, Kazunari Nakahara2, Takefumi Kikuchi3, Hiroaki Mita3, Masahiro Nakamura3, Yukinari Yoshida3, Yasuo Kato3, Yoshifumi Ishii4, Takao Endo3.
Abstract
We herein report a rare case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with a pancreatogastric fistula in an elderly Japanese man admitted to our hospital. The pancreatogastric fistula was confirmed using endoscopic retrograde pancreatography via a cannulated guidewire placed in the stomach. Six months after admission, the patient was diagnosed with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. A pancreatogastric fistula is generally a rare complication of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. It was caused by mechanical penetration in this case. Interestingly, we also observed endoscopic and histochemical mucosal changes in the fistula.Entities:
Keywords: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; mechanical penetration; pancreatogastric fistula
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33229807 PMCID: PMC8112989 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5889-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure 1.Findings of diagnostic imaging. A: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showing the papillary tumor with a typical fish egg-like mucosal lesion on the fistula. B: Abdominal enhanced computed tomography showing a cystic lesion of the pancreas and pancreatogastric fistula. C: Endoscopic ultrasonography confirming a pancreatogastric fistula.
Figure 2.A pathological examination of the initial biopsy specimen. A: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining: low-power microscopy showing a non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm border with the fistula in the stomach. B, C: Immunohistochemical staining revealing that around 30% neoplastic cells were Ki-67-positive (B), and the majority were p53-negative (C).
Figure 3.Findings of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showing the main pancreatic duct and pancreatogastric fistula. A guidewire was inserted into the stomach via the pancreatogastric fistula. B: Endoscopically confirmed guidewire placement in the stomach.
Figure 4.Follow-up imaging findings. A: Abdominal computed tomography showing gradual enlargement of the pancreatogastric fistula and pancreatic cystic lesion during follow-up. In addition, there were several metastatic lesions in the liver along with dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct. B: Compared with the previous esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, the mucous membrane was irregular, and the fish egg-like appearance of the fistula had disappeared.
Figure 5.A pathological examination of the second biopsy specimen. A: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining: high-power microscopy showing an invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma with a fistula in the stomach. B: Immunohistochemically, around 70% of the neoplastic cells showed Ki-67 expression. C: Immunohistochemically, around 40% of the neoplastic cells showed p53 expression.
Clinical Features of Previously Reported Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm with Pancreatogastric Fistula.
| Case | Reference | Age | Gender | invasion | IPMN type | IPMN | Pathology | location | Fistula | Organ | prognosis | Dead or |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 74 | M | - | unknown | NM | pap AC | pt | + | - | 12 | D |
| 2 | 13 | 75 | M | - | unknown | NM | pap A | ph,pb | - | - | 24 | A |
| 3 | 12 | 72 | F | - | unknown | NM | pap B | pb,pt | - | - | 36 | A |
| 4 | 10 | 70 | F | - | intestinal type | Convine | pap B | ph | - | duodenum | 36 | A |
| 5 | 11 | 79 | F | -(maybe) | unknown | NM | NM | ph | - | - | NM | A |
| 6 | 8 | 79 | M | - | unknown | NM | pap A | ph | - | duodenum | 18 | A |
| 7 | 7 | 84 | M | + | unknown | NM | pap tub AC | ph,pb | NM | duodenum (bulb & 2nd) | 13 | A |
| 8 | 6 | 72 | F | - | intestinal type | Main | pap AC | pb | - | - | 9 | D |
| 9 | 6 | 61 | F | + | intestinal type | Branch | col pap AC | pb,pt | - | - | 27 | D |
| 10 | 6 | 70 | M | + | intestinal type | Main | col pap AC | ph,pb,pt | - | duodenum | 1 | D |
| 11 | 6 | 69 | M | + | intestinal type | Main | col pap AC | pb,pt | + | duodenum | 20 | D |
| 12 | 6 | 50 | F | + | Pancreatobiliary type | Branch | tub pap AC | ph | + | duodenum, colon | 12 | D |
| 13 | 6 | 83 | M | NM | intestinal type | Branch | col AC | ph,pb,pt | NM | duodenum | 2 | D |
| 14 | 6 | 83 | M | NM | intestinal type | Main | pap AC | pt | NM | duodenum, choledochus | 2 | D |
| 15 | 6 | 83 | M | NM | intestinal type | Main | pap AC | pb | NM | duodenum, choledochus | 110 | D |
| 16 | present case | 83 | M | - | Pancreatobiliary type | Main | pap B | ph,pb,pt | - | - | 8 | D |
AC: adenocarcinoma, A: adenoma, B: border line, pap: papillary mucinous, col: colloid, tub: tubular, ph: pancreatic head, pb: pancreatic body, pt: pancreatic tail, NM: not mentioned