| Literature DB >> 33228667 |
Shantanu Sharma1,2, Devika Mehra3, Faiyaz Akhtar3, Sunil Mehra3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Empowered women have improved decision-making capacity and can demand equal access to health services. Community-based interventions based on building women's groups for awareness generation on maternal and child health (MCH) are the best and cost-effective approaches in improving their access to health services. The present study evaluated a community-based intervention aimed at improving marginalized women's awareness and utilization of MCH services, and access to livelihood and savings using the peer-led approach from two districts of India.Entities:
Keywords: Employment; Health education; Health services; Implementation science; Maternal health; Poverty; Reproductive health
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33228667 PMCID: PMC7686717 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09884-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Location of the two districts of the intervention in the map of Uttar Pradesh (the state in the central zone of India). Banda is situated to the south and Kaushambi to the south-east of the capital of Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow). The map depicted above was developed by us
Fig. 2Theory of change for the community-based intervention across two districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. The theory of change model illustrates how the desired outcome of improved utilization of reproductive and maternal health services and access to livelihood opportunities and savings for 37,324 marginalized women in Banda and Kaushambi Districts of Uttar Pradesh, India was achieved through precise link of inputs, activities, and outputs. Abbreviations: IEC: Information, education, and communication, MIS: Management information system; MCH: Maternal and child health; MGNREGA: Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act; MCH: Maternal and child health; VHSNC: Village health, sanitation, and nutrition committee
Sequential flow of the implementation activities
| Phases of Implementation | Implementation activities |
|---|---|
| Pre-intervention | 1. Rapid assessment survey at the baseline 2. Mobilization of marginalized women from the communities and formation of groups by outreach workers 3. Identification of peer educators from within the groups and training of peer educators by outreach workers |
| Intervention | 1. Education sessions on maternal and childcare and financial literacy by peer educators 2. Community-based events and meetings to engage community leaders, husbands, and mothers-in-law of young married women 3. Active participation in the village health sanitation and nutrition committees’ meetings 4. Capacity building of community health workers and midwives on segmentation and inclusive approach for delivering services related to sexual and reproductive health 5. Linking marginalized women with MGNREGA schemes, and running a campaign of ‘ |
| Post-intervention | End line assessment |
Abbreviations: MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
Implementation actors and their roles
| Implementation actors | Roles |
|---|---|
| State Manager and District coordinators | Effective liaising with government, and other relevant stakeholders, monitoring the activities, reviewing the progress of the intervention and managing the challenges and risks at the local level |
| Outreach workers | Conducting the training and providing mentoring support to the peer educators, handholding support and liaising with community health workers, VHSNC members, and monitoring the activities of peer educators |
| Peer educators | Conducting education sessions for peers in the communities, handling problems, and providing solutions to their problems |
Abbreviations: VHSNC Village health sanitation and nutrition committee
Qualitative data analysis from the rapid assessment at baseline
| Themes | Responses obtained from the interviewees |
|---|---|
| Perceived awareness and utilization of MCH services by women | Women appeared to have little information on newborn and child care practices, including breastfeeding, and newborn hygiene. Their utilization of antenatal services was perceived poor. Most of the women seemed to have been dependent on mothers-in-law for any health-related problem of their children. A few women seemed to know about family planning methods. However, the uptake of contraceptives was perceived poor because women were hesitant to talk about them, they appeared to have limited knowledge about them, a lot of misconceptions about their side effects prevail in the society, women seemed to lack negotiation skills, non-cooperating attitude of husbands, and unavailability of contraceptives at health facilities. Medical officers revealed that the institutional delivery rate has improved in their areas, which might be due to the launch of the maternity benefit scheme ( |
| Perceived support from family (husbands or mothers-in-law) for accessing MCH services | Women in some of the FGD reported a lack of support from husbands for institutional delivery or to work outside their homes. |
| Perceived utilization of the MGNREGA scheme by women | A fewer number of women went to work under MGNREGA. Many women who started working under MGNREGA left it once they became pregnant. The MGNREGA staff mentioned that various services were provided to pregnant women at the worksites such as drinking water and medicines, a shed to feed their children. However, most of the women did not continue for a very long time. |
Abbreviations: FGD Focus group discussion, IDI In-depth interviews, JSY Janani Suraksha Yojna, MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, MCH Maternal and child health, PHC Primary health centers
District-wise distribution of the socio-demographic characteristics of women (n = 37,324) obtained through the management information system
| Socio-demographic variables | Banda ( | Kaushambi ( |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) age of women (years) at the time of enrollmenta | 28 (8.4) | 28 (9.2) |
| Mean (SD) age of women at marriage (years)b | 17.3 (1.4) | 14 (7.3) |
| Mean (SD) years of schooling (years)c | 4 (3.0) | 10 (1.5) |
| Religion | ||
| Hindu | 17,845 (94.6) | 17,010 (92.2) |
| Muslim | 1018 (5.4) | 1432 (7.8) |
| Christian | 8 (< 0.1) | 2 (< 0.1) |
| Missing cases | 0 | 9 (< 0.1) |
| Social class | ||
| Scheduled castes | 7084 (37.5) | 16,463 (89.5) |
| Scheduled tribes | 1139 (6.0) | 94 (0.5) |
| Other marginalized castes | 10,195 (54.0) | 1446 (7.9) |
| Non-marginalized class | 408 (2.2) | 133 (0.7) |
| Missing cases | 45 (< 0.1) | 317 (1.7) |
| Possession of below poverty line card | ||
| Yes | 12,341 (65.4) | 7766 (42.3) |
| No | 6530 (34.6) | 10,608 (57.7) |
| Missing cases | 0 | 79 (< 0.1) |
Abbreviations: SD Standard Deviation
aThe denominator for Banda was 14,984 and Kaushambi was 16,655
bThe denominator for Banda was 18,869 and Kaushambi was 18,447. The data were skewed. The median years of schooling for Banda were 0
cThe denominator for Banda was 18,861 and Kaushambi was 18,453
Frequency and percentage distribution of the outcome indicators comparing data from baseline and Management information system
| Variables | Baseline | MIS Data | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banda ( | Kaushambi ( | Banda ( | Kaushambi ( | |
| Women who had an account in her name in bank or post-office | 93 (38.8) | 108 (45.8) | 10,316 (54.7) | 8238 (44.6) |
| Women registered to work in MGNERGA | 73 (30.4) | 67 (28.4) | 7353 (39.0) | 6591 (35.7) |
| Of those registered to work, women who utilized MGNREGA schemea | 31 (42.4) | 32 (47.7) | 6922 (94.1) | 5234 (79.4) |
| Women who delivered in an institutionb | 189 (79.1) | 162 (68.6) | 794 (97.7) | 95 (87.2) |
| Women who received postnatal care within 48 h of deliveryc | 31 (12.9) | 26 (11) | 749 (78.0) | 85 (78.0) |
Abbreviations: MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, MIS Management Information System
aTotal sample size for MIS data for Banda (n = 7353) and Kaushambi (n = 6591)
bTotal Sample size for MIS data was: Banda (n = 847) and Kaushambi (n = 109)
cTotal sample size for MIS data was: Banda (n = 1629) and Kaushambi (n = 1372)
Frequency and percentage distribution of women who had accessed/not accessed MGNREGA and/or had a bank account and/or received education sessions based on MIS data
| Variables | Total ( |
|---|---|
| Women who registered in MGNREGA and had a savings bank account | 8932 (23.9) |
| Women who registered in MGNREGA but did not have a savings bank account | 5012 (13.4) |
| Women who had a savings bank account but did not register in MGNREGA | 9622 (25.8) |
| Women who did not register in MGNREGA and did not have a savings bank account, but have received group education sessions and taken any other health benefits | 13,758 (36.8) |
Abbreviations: MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, MIS Management Information System