| Literature DB >> 33228624 |
Youjie Zhang1, Xiaofan Zhang2, Jun Li2, Hua Zhong3, Chen-Wei Pan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether and to what extent outdoor activity and screen time are relevant to adiposity among rural adolescents remain largely unknown as most of relevant evidence was generated from high-income countries and urban areas. This study aimed to investigate associations of outdoor activity and screen time with adiposity among early adolescents living in rural southwest China.Entities:
Keywords: Early adolescents; Outdoor activity; Overweight and obesity; Rural; Screen time; Waist circumference
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33228624 PMCID: PMC7684968 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09897-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Sociodemographic characteristics of the total sample and by weight status and waist circumference (n = 2264)
| All | Weight Status | pa | Waist Circumference | pa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 85th percentile | ≥ 85th percentile | < 90th percentile | ≥ 90th percentile | ||||
| Age | 13.7 ± 0.7 | 13.7 ± 0.7 | 13.6 ± 0.7 | .040 | 13.7 ± 0.7 | 13.7 ± 0.7 | .715 |
| Sex | |||||||
| Boys | 1164 (51.4%) | 1074 (92.3%) | 90 (7.7%) | .635 | 1121 (96.3%) | 43 (3.7%) | .006 |
| Girls | 1100 (48.6%) | 1009 (91.7%) | 91 (8.3%) | 1032 (93.8%) | 68 (6.2%) | ||
| Single child | |||||||
| No | 1741 (78.0%) | 1626 (93.4%) | 115 (6.6%) | <.001 | 1670 (95.9%) | 71 (4.1%) | .002 |
| Yes | 490 (22.0%) | 430 (87.8%) | 60 (12.2%) | 453 (92.5%) | 37 (7.6%) | ||
| Minority | |||||||
| No | 387 (17.1%) | 354 (91.5%) | 33 (8.5%) | .672 | 370 (95.6%) | 17 (4.4%) | .610 |
| Yes | 1877 (82.9%) | 1729 (92.1%) | 148 (7.9%) | 1783 (95.0%) | 94 (5.0%) | ||
| Parent education | |||||||
| < high school | 1678 (77.6%) | 1567 (93.4%) | 111 (6.6%) | <.001 | 1610 (96.0%) | 68 (4.1%) | .001 |
| ≥ high school | 485 (22.4%) | 424 (87.4%) | 61 (12.6%) | 447 (92.2%) | 38 (7.8%) | ||
| Fathers’ work | |||||||
| Not farmer | 876 (39.3%) | 778 (88.8%) | 98 (11.2%) | <.001 | 818 (93.4%) | 58 (6.6%) | .004 |
| Farmer | 1352 (60.7%) | 1271 (94.0%) | 81 (6.0%) | 1299 (96.1%) | 53 (3.9%) | ||
a Comparisons were made using between-group t-tests and Chi-square tests
Outdoor activity and screen time of the total sample and by weight status and waist circumference (n = 2264)
| All | Weight Status | pa | Waist Circumference | pa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 85th percentile | ≥ 85th percentile | < 90th percentile | ≥ 90th percentile | ||||
| Outdoor activity-weekday | |||||||
| ≥ 1 h | 1260 (55.7%) | 1180 (93.7%) | 80 (6.4%) | .001 | 1214 (96.4%) | 46 (3.7%) | .002 |
| < 1 h | 990 (43.7%) | 890 (89.9%) | 100 (10.1%) | 925 (93.4%) | 65 (6.6%) | ||
| Outdoor activity-weekend | |||||||
| ≥ 1 h | 1676 (74.0%) | 1542 (92.0%) | 134 (8.0%) | .886 | 1597 (95.3%) | 79 (4.7%) | .446 |
| < 1 h | 562 (24.8%) | 516 (91.8%) | 46 (8.2%) | 531 (94.5%) | 31 (5.5%) | ||
| Outdoor activity-weighted average | |||||||
| ≥ 1 h | 1540 (68.0%) | 1435 (93.2%) | 105 (6.8%) | .001 | 1477 (95.9%) | 63 (4.1%) | .006 |
| < 1 h | 691 (30.5%) | 616 (89.2%) | 75 (10.9%) | 644 (93.2%) | 47 (6.8%) | ||
| Screen time-weekday | |||||||
| ≤ 2 h | 1218 (53.8%) | 1132 (92.9%) | 86 (7.1%) | .089 | 1168 (95.9%) | 50 (4.1%) | .041 |
| > 2 h | 1018 (45.0%) | 926 (91.0%) | 92 (9.0%) | 957 (94.0%) | 61 (6.0%) | ||
| Screen time-weekend | |||||||
| ≤ 2 h | 682 (30.1%) | 636 (93.3%) | 46 (6.7%) | .151 | 660 (96.8%) | 22 (3.2%) | .013 |
| > 2 h | 1559 (68.9%) | 1426 (91.5%) | 133 (8.5%) | 1470 (94.3%) | 89 (5.7%) | ||
| Screen time-weighted average | |||||||
| ≤ 2 h | 1036 (45.8%) | 963 (93.0%) | 73 (7.1%) | .119 | 993 (95.9%) | 43 (4.2%) | .088 |
| > 2 h | 1187 (52.4%) | 1082 (91.2%) | 105 (8.9%) | 1119 (94.3%) | 68 (5.7%) | ||
a Comparisons were made using Chi-square tests
Binary logistic regressions between adolescents’ weight status and waist circumferences and outdoor activity and screen time (n = 2264)
| Overweight/obesity | High waist circumference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Outdoor activity-weekday | ||||
| ≥ 1 h | reference | reference | ||
| < 1 h | 1.86 | (1.30, 2.66)** | 2.22 | (1.39, 3.57)** |
| Outdoor activity-weekend | ||||
| ≥ 1 h | reference | reference | ||
| < 1 h | 1.31 | (.87, 1.95) | 1.45 | (.88, 2.40) |
| Outdoor activity-daily average | ||||
| ≥ 1 h | reference | reference | ||
| < 1 h | 1.95 | (1.36, 2.80)** | 2.15 | (1.36, 3.41)** |
| Screen time-weekday | ||||
| ≤ 2 h | reference | reference | ||
| > 2 h | 1.15 | (.81, 1.65) | 1.46 | (.93, 2.32) |
| Screen time-weekend | ||||
| ≤ 2 h | reference | reference | ||
| > 2 h | 0.96 | (.64, 1.43) | 2.08 | (1.14, 3.80)* |
| Screen time-daily average | ||||
| ≤ 2 h | reference | reference | ||
| > 2 h | 0.94 | (.65, 1.36) | 1.31 | (.81, 2.11) |
Covariates include adolescents’ age, sex, being the single child, ethnic minority, frequencies of fruit intake and vegetable intake, sleep time (≥ 8 h per day or not), parents’ education, and fathers’ occupation. * p < .05, ** p < .01
Fig. 1Joint associations of weighted daily physical activity and screen time with adolescents’ (a) weight status and (b) waist circumference, after adjusting for adolescents’ age, sex, being the single child, ethnic minority, frequencies of fruit intake and vegetable intake, sleep time (≥ 8 h per day or not), parents’ education, and fathers’ occupation (*p < 0.01)