| Literature DB >> 33228604 |
Shinya Nishida1,2, Kazuhiro Ota3, Kimiaki Hattori4,5, Taro Iwatsubo1,2, Shimpei Kawaguchi1, Yuichi Kojima1, Toshihisa Takeuchi1, Tamaki Maeda4, Masahiro Sakaguchi2, Kazuhide Higuchi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are often specific endoscopic findings caused by deposition of lanthanum (La) in the gastric mucosa of patients taking lanthanum carbonate (LaC), a novel phosphate binder for patients on hemodialysis. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the clinical significance of La deposition in the gastric mucosa, and the association between endoscopic features and histologic findings in the same population.Entities:
Keywords: Histiocytic infiltration; Lanthanum; Phosphate binder; Whitish lesion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33228604 PMCID: PMC7684883 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01545-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1Specific endoscopic feature (red arrows) of La deposition in the gastric mucosa at the endoscopic biopsy sites. a Whitish spot, b annular whitish mucosa and c diffuse whitish mucosa
Patient characteristics in Study 1
| Patient characteristics | La deposition (+), n = 23 | La deposition (−), n = 19 | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, n (%) | 14 (60.9%) | 13 (68.4%) | 1.39 (0.39–5.01) | 0.258 |
| Age, median (range) | 72 (47–82) | 68 (45–83) | – | 0.909 |
| Gastric mucosal atrophy (mild, medium, severe)*, n (%) | 5 (21.7%), 7 (30.4%), 11 (47.8%) | 7 (36.8%), 3 (15.8%), 9 (47.4%) | – | 0.413 |
| Primary diseases of dialysis (diabetes, hypertension, nephritis), n (%) | 8 (34.8%), 3 (13.4%), 12 (52.2%) | 10 (52.6%), 2 (10.5%), 7 (36.8%) | – | 0.504 |
| Years since start of dialysis, median (range) | 7.32 (0.70–26.4) | 5.83 (1.57–14.2) | – | 0.092 |
| Months of oral use of LaC, median (range) | 34 (4–70) | 28 (10–72) | – | 0.206 |
| Daily dose of LaC, mg, median (range) | 1000 (500–1500) | 750 (250–1500) | – | 0.104 |
| Total dose of LaC, g, median (range) | 990 (180–3150) | 480 (225–1328) | – | |
| Ca, mg/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 4) | 8.9 (8–10.2) | 8.4 (7.2–9.9) | – | 0.084 |
| IP, mg/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 7) | 5.5 (3.5–8.1) | 5.3 (3.1–8.3) | – | 0.586 |
| TP, g/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 8) | 6.4 (4.8–7.9) | 6.35 (4.3–7.3) | – | 0.479 |
| Albumin, g/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 7) | 3.5 (2.7–4.0) | 3.6 (2.4–4.0) | – | 0.752 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 10) | 166 (103–203) | 151 (88–240) | – | 0.454 |
| HDL–cholesterol, mg/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 13) | 47 (24–67) | 47 (18–97) | – | 0.790 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 9) | 103 (50–336) | 94.5 (35–198) | – | 0.649 |
| WBC, /µL, median (range) (number of missing data: 6) | 5460 (3370–8300) | 6535 (2650–12,470) | – | 0.133 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL, median (range) (number of missing data: 5) | 10.5 (7.3–12.5) | 10.55 (7.3–12.8) | – | 0.976 |
| NSAIDs (including low–dose aspirin), n (%) | 10 (43.5%) | 10 (52.6%) | 0.69 (0.20–2.35) | 0.554 |
| PPIs, n (%) | 17 (73.9%) | 17 (89.5%) | 0.33 (0.06–1.89) | 0.201 |
| PPIs + H2RAs, n (%) | 21 (91.3%) | 17 (89.5%) | 1.24 (0.16–9.71) | 0.841 |
| Gastric mucoprotective drugs, n (%) | 9 (39.1%) | 4 (21.1%) | 2.41 (0.60–9.63) | 0.207 |
La, lanthanum; CI, confidence interval; LaC, lanthanum carbonate; Ca, calcium; IP, inorganic phosphorus; TP, total protein; WBC, white blood cell; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; H2RA, histamine H2 receptor antagonist
*The degree of gastric mucosal atrophy is classified into mild, medium, or severe according to the Takemoto-Kimura classification [13]. Mild: C-1 and C-2, medium: C-3 and O-1, severe: O-2 and O-3
Italic font represents statistical significance
Comparison of the LaC-taking patients and the control dialysis patients
| Patient characteristics | LaC–taking patients, n = 42 | Control dialysis patients, n = 42 | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, n (%) | 15 (35.7%) | 20 (47.6%) | 0.61 (0.25–1.47) | 0.269 |
| Age, median (range) | 68 (45–83) | 70 (35–86) | – | 0.400 |
| Gastric mucosal atrophy (mild, medium, severe)*, n (%) | 12 (28.6%), 10 (23.8%) 20 (47.6%) | 14 (33.3%), 10 (23.8%), 18 (42.9%) | – | 0.879 |
| Primary diseases of dialysis (diabetes, hypertension, nephritis), n (%) | 18 (42.9%), 5 (11.9%), 19 (45.2%) | 13 (31.0%), 7 (16.7%), 22 (52.4%) | – | 0.507 |
| Years since start of dialysis, median (range) | 6.12 (0.7–26.4) | 3.58 (0.002–12.5) | – | |
| Ca, mg/dL, median (range) | 8.75 (7.2–10.2) | 8.9 (6.1–10.3) | – | 0.300 |
| IP, mg/dL, median (range) | 5.5 (3.1–8.3) | 4.9 (1.9–7.5) | – | 0.320 |
| TP, g/dL, median (range) | 6.4 (4.3–7.9) | 6.6 (3.9–7.9) | – | 0.184 |
| Albumin, g/dL, median (range) | 3.5 (2.4–4.0) | 3.5 (2.5–4.7) | – | 0.362 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL, median (range) | 158.5 (88–240) | 160 (93–303) | – | 0.402 |
| HDL–cholesterol, mg/dL, median (range) | 47 (18–97) | 49.5 (23–78) | – | 0.601 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL, median (range) | 97 (35–336) | 92.5 (36–271) | – | 0.721 |
| WBC, /µL, median (range) | 5720 (2650–12,470) | 5210 (2800–11,800) | – | 0.068 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL, median (range) | 10.5 (7.3–12.8) | 10.6 (7.1–12.4) | – | 0.709 |
| NSAIDs (including low–dose aspirin), n (%) | 18 (42.9%) | 10 (23.8%) | 2.4 (0.94–6.12) | 0.064 |
| PPIs, n (%) | 34 (81.0%) | 32 (76.2%) | 1.32 (0.47–3.79) | 0.595 |
| PPIs + H2RA, n (%) | 38 (90.5%) | 35 (83.3%) | 1.9 (0.51–7.05) | 0.332 |
| Gastric mucoprotective drugs, n (%) | 13 (31.0%) | 6 (14.3%) | 2.79 (0.91–7.95) | 0.068 |
La, lanthanum; CI, confidence interval; LaC, lanthanum carbonate; Ca, calcium; IP, inorganic phosphorus; TP, total protein; WBC, white blood cell; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; H2RA, histamine H2 receptor antagonist
*The degree of gastric mucosal atrophy is classified into mild, medium, or severe according to the Takemoto-Kimura classification [13]. Mild: C-1 and C-2, medium: C-3 and O-1, severe: O-2 and O-3
Italic font represents statistical significance
Fig. 2Histologic features of La crystalloid (hematoxylin–eosin stain). The bar shows 100 µm. a Whole specimen from the gastric mucosa with very small fragments of La crystalloid materials (yellow arrows). There are one or two small fragments of La crystalloid in the slice of the specimen. b Whole specimen from the gastric mucosa with more La crystalloid materials (yellow arrows)
Fig. 3Histologic features of histiocytes aggregating (hematoxylin–eosin stain). The bar shows 100 µm. a Less than 30% of the lamina propria is occupied by histiocytes aggregating in the gastric mucosa (yellow arrows). a′ The enlarged view of the red square in a. b More than 80% of the lamina propria is occupied by histiocytes aggregating in the gastric mucosa. b′ The enlarged view of the blue square in b
The relationship between the endoscopic features and the amount of La deposition
| Amount of La crystalloid materials | One or two small fragments of La crystalloid | Three or more La crystalloids |
|---|---|---|
Specific whitish mucosa+ 27 biopsy specimens | 14 (51.9%) | 13 (48.2%) |
Specific whitish mucosa− 24 biopsy specimens | 17 (70.8%) | 7 (29.2) |
Data are presented as number (percentage)
Pearson’s chi-square test: p = 0.166
The relationship between endoscopic features and degree of histiocytic infiltration
| Histiocytic infiltration | None | Mild | Severe |
|---|---|---|---|
Specific whitish mucosa+ 27 biopsy specimens | 0 | 10 (37.0%) | 17 (63.0%) |
Specific whitish mucosa− 24 biopsy specimens | 5 (20.8%) | 10 (41.7%) | 9 (37.5%) |
Data are presented as number (percentage)
Pearson’s chi-square test: p = 0.026, Cochran-Armitage trend test: p = 0.013