INTRODUCTION: since Lauren classified gastric cancer into intestinal-type adenocarcinoma and diffuse gastric carcinoma back in 1965, countless categorizations have been published that attempt to elucidate the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between histological subtypes. OBJECTIVE: a retrospective study was performed of gastric cancer cases managed in a third-level site over ten years in order to compare subtypes between the most widely used classifications (Lauren and World Health Organization [WHO]). METHODS: a comparative study of the most relevant clinicopathological characteristics and a multivariate survival analysis were performed. RESULTS: significant differences exist between histological subtypes in terms of age, gender, location, extension, stage and treatment received. A univariate overall survival analysis revealed better survival rates for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma as compared to diffuse carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.405 [1.024-1.927]) according to the Lauren's classification. Furthermore, there was a better prognosis of mucinous carcinoma (HR: 0.378 [0.164-0.868]), though failing to prove a poorer prognosis of poorly cohesive (HR: 1.242 [0.878-1.757]) and signet cell (HR: 1.354 [0.792-2.314]) carcinomas, according to the WHO classification. In the multivariate overall survival analysis, the following poor prognosis factors were identified: male gender, local infiltration (T), nodal invasion (N) and received adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: although the various histological subtypes show significant clinicopathological differences, further studies are needed to compare them and clarify the prognostic relevance of each one.
INTRODUCTION: since Lauren classified gastric cancer into intestinal-type adenocarcinoma and diffuse gastric carcinoma back in 1965, countless categorizations have been published that attempt to elucidate the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between histological subtypes. OBJECTIVE: a retrospective study was performed of gastric cancer cases managed in a third-level site over ten years in order to compare subtypes between the most widely used classifications (Lauren and World Health Organization [WHO]). METHODS: a comparative study of the most relevant clinicopathological characteristics and a multivariate survival analysis were performed. RESULTS: significant differences exist between histological subtypes in terms of age, gender, location, extension, stage and treatment received. A univariate overall survival analysis revealed better survival rates for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma as compared to diffuse carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.405 [1.024-1.927]) according to the Lauren's classification. Furthermore, there was a better prognosis of mucinous carcinoma (HR: 0.378 [0.164-0.868]), though failing to prove a poorer prognosis of poorly cohesive (HR: 1.242 [0.878-1.757]) and signet cell (HR: 1.354 [0.792-2.314]) carcinomas, according to the WHO classification. In the multivariate overall survival analysis, the following poor prognosis factors were identified: male gender, local infiltration (T), nodal invasion (N) and received adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: although the various histological subtypes show significant clinicopathological differences, further studies are needed to compare them and clarify the prognostic relevance of each one.
Authors: J L Moore; A R Davies; A Santaolalla; M Van Hemelrijck; N Maisey; J Lagergren; J A Gossage; M Kelly; C R Baker Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 4.339