| Literature DB >> 33228107 |
Katarzyna Ławińska1, Szymon Szufa2, Remigiusz Modrzewski2, Andrzej Obraniak2, Tomasz Wężyk1, Andrzej Rostocki1, Tomasz P Olejnik3.
Abstract
This paper presents the results of research on the granulation process of leather industry waste, i.e., tanning shavings. It is economically justified to granulate this waste together with mineral additives that are useful in the processes of their further processing. Unfortunately, the granulation of raw, unsorted shavings does not obtain desired results due to their unusual properties. In this study, the possibilities of agglomeration of this waste were examined by a new method consisting of the production and then the granulation of wet pulp. During granulation, no additional binding liquid is added to the granulated bed. As part of this work, the specific surface of granulated shavings, the granulometric composition of the obtained agglomerates, and their strength parameters were determined. The use of a vibrating disc granulator, the addition of a water glass solution (in the pulp), dolomite, and gypsum made it possible to obtain durable, mechanically stable granules.Entities:
Keywords: agglomerates; disc granulation; shavings; tanning waste
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33228107 PMCID: PMC7699417 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Grain-size composition of shavings.
| Sample | Fraction, mm | Mass Fraction % |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | >4 | 17.5 |
| C2 | 2–4 | 23 |
| C3 | 1–2 | 25.5 |
| C4 | 0.5–1 | 20 |
| C5 | <0.5 | 14 |
Grain-size composition of shavings.
| Sample of Shavings | Total Sorption Capacity, cm3/g STP | Specific Surface, BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) | Adsorption Equilibrium | Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 0.81 | 3.51 ± 0.02 | 12.97 | 0.999 |
| C2 | 0.59 | 2.55 ± 0.02 | 20.72 | 0.999 |
| C3 | 0.65 | 2.84 ± 0.02 | 19.13 | 0.999 |
| C4 | 0.61 | 2.66 ± 0.01 | 23.67 | 0.999 |
| C5 | 0.60 | 2.63 ± 0.01 | 23.85 | 0.999 |
Figure 1Structure of tanning shavings ((a)—C1, (b)—C5, and (c)—C6 fractions).
Figure 2The process of granulation of tanning shavings in pulp according to methods 2, 4, and 7.
Figure 3Granulate grain-size (methods 1–5).
Figure 4Granulate grain-size (methods 6–7).
Figure 5Comparison of disc granulation methods with the addition of wet gypsum.
Figure 6Comparison of disc granulation methods with the addition of dolomite.
Average force destroying granules.
| Agglomerate | Average Force Destroying Granules N | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method 1 | Method 2 | Method 3 | Method 4 | Method 5 | Method 6 | Method 7 | |
| 0–1 | 1.83 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.5 |
| 1–2 | 3.46 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 6.1 | 8.3 | 4.1 | 0.9 |
| 2–3 | 4.07 | 6.8 | 5.2 | 25.1 | 21.2 | 5 | 1.2 |
| 3–4 | 4.34 | 7.8 | 6.2 | 30.6 | 29.1 | 5.2 | 1.6 |
| 4–5 | 6.65 | 9.7 | 7.7 | 60.2 | 67.2 | 6.6 | 2.2 |
| 5–6.3 | 7.02 | 23.1 | 8.4 | 82.5 | 73.5 | 7.1 | 2.7 |
| 6.3–8 | 18.34 | 29.8 | 11.6 | 129.8 | 126 | 13.8 | 4.4 |
| 8–10 | 39.97 | 31.5 | 26 | 158.8 | 185.4 | 27.8 | 10.3 |
| 10–12.5 | 43.99 | 40.2 | 28.6 | 190.9 | 198.7 | 28.8 | 13.1 |
| 12.5–14 | 65.438 | 41.9 | 34.9 | 200 | 200 | 35.9 | 17.1 |
| >14 | 149.838 | 95.4 | 96.3 | 200 | 200 | 48.1 | 26.2 |
Number of non-broken granules.
| Agglomerate | Number of Non-Broken Granules, pc | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method 1 | Method 2 | Method 3 | Method 4 | Method 5 | Method 6 | Method 7 | |
| 5–6.3 | 60 | 60 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 55 | 54 |
| 6.3–8 | 59 | 60 | 57 | 60 | 60 | 59 | 59 |
| 8–10 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 58 | 60 | 58 | 59 |
| 10–12.5 | 59 | 60 | 58 | 59 | 59 | 59 | 58 |
| 12.5–14 | 60 | 60 | 57 | 60 | 59 | 58 | 54 |
| >14 | 60 | 60 | 57 | 60 | 58 | 60 | 58 |
| sum | 57/60 | 60/60 | 44/60 | 56/60 | 56/60 | 49/60 | 42/60 |
Figure 7Vibrating disc granulator.
Process parameters of granulation.
| Method | Fraction of Shavings [mm] | Water Glass Solution [g] | Mineral Additive | Mass of Mineral Additive [g] | Time of Granulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–2 | 1000 | Wet gypsum | 500 | 10 |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1000 | Wet gypsum | 500 | 10 |
| 3 | 0–2 | 800 | Wet gypsum | 500 | 10 |
| 4 | 0–2 | 800 | Dolomite | 1700 | 13 |
| 5 | 0–2 | 600 | Dolomite | 1500 | 8 |
| 6 | 0–1 | 800 | Wet gypsum | 400 | 15 |
| 7 | 0–1 | 800 | Wet gypsum | 400 | 18 |