| Literature DB >> 33228005 |
Rossana V C Cardoso1,2, Márcio Carocho1, Ângela Fernandes1, Diego Cunha Zied3, Juan Diego Valenzuela Cobos4, Ana M González-Paramás2, Isabel C F R Ferreira1, Lillian Barros1.
Abstract
Supplementation of mushroom substrates has been linked to a higher resistance against insect pests, although few studies show the impact of this supplementation on the different agronomical parameters of mushrooms or even their chemical composition. In this work, the variation in the biological and chemical composition of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus var. florida (Jacq.) P. Kumm) was analysed after varying the substrate supplementation of calcium silicate (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4% (w/w%)) during two harvest flushes. Overall, supplementation did not change the weight, the number of fruiting bodies, biological efficiency, yield ratio, and productivity rate of the mushrooms, although the harvest flushes did show significant differences. Furthermore, slight changes were found in the chemical composition with an increase in vitamin D2 and tocopherols for the mushrooms with higher amounts of calcium silicate. Overall, the substrate supplementation did not seem to induce expressive changes or decrease production yields, and can, therefore, continue to be researched as a potential application to fight agronomical pests.Entities:
Keywords: Pleurotus ostreatus var. florida (Jacq.) P. Kumm; biological production; chemical composition; harvest; substrate supplementation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33228005 PMCID: PMC7712851 DOI: 10.3390/jof6040299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Biological parameters of the two strains during the two harvest periods and different supplementation concentrations.
| Presidente Prudente (PP) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mushroom Weight (g) | Number of Mushrooms | Biological Efficiency (%) | Yield Ratio | Productivity Rate (% per Day) | ||
| Harvest number (HN) | First flush | 167 ± 52 * | 50 ± 21 * | 104 ± 32 * | 8 ± 2 * | 4 ± 1 * |
| Second flush | 110 ± 41 | 35 ± 16 | 69 ± 25 | 5 ± 2 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | |
| Student T test | <0.001 | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Calcium silicate supplementation (CS) | Control | 164 ± 65 | 40 ± 22 | 103 ± 41 | 8 ± 3 | 3 ± 2 |
| 0.5% | 147 ± 59 | 43 ± 16 | 92 ± 36 | 7 ± 3 | 3 ± 1 | |
| 1% | 129 ± 45 | 47 ± 27 | 81 ± 28 | 6 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | |
| 2% | 124 ± 52 | 39 ± 21 | 77 ± 32 | 6 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | |
| 4% | 129 ± 48 | 43 ± 16 | 80 ± 30 | 6 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | 0.296 | 0.897 | 0.296 | 0.296 | 0.571 | |
| HN×CS ( | 0.826 | 0.332 | 0.826 | 0.826 | 0.697 | |
|
| ||||||
| Harvest number (HN) | First flush | 172 ± 27 * | 46 ± 6 * | 108 ± 13 * | 9 ± 1 * | 4 ± 1 * |
| Second flush | 135 ± 68 | 33 ± 4 | 84 ± 42 | 7 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | |
| Student T test | 0.044 | 0.031 | 0.044 | 0.044 | <0.001 | |
| Calcium silicate supplementation (CS) | Control | 174 ± 79 | 48 ± 30 | 108 ± 49 | 9 ± 4 | 4 ± 2 |
| 0.5% | 156 ± 43 | 35 ± 18 | 97 ± 27 | 8 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | |
| 1% | 159 ± 50 | 41 ± 12 | 100 ± 31 | 8 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | |
| 2% | 156 ± 44 | 43 ± 26 | 97 ± 27 | 8 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | |
| 4% | 124 ± 94 | 30 ± 19 | 78 ± 59 | 6 ± 5 | 3 ± 2 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | 0.529 | 0.350 | 0.529 | 0.529 | 0.708 | |
| HN×CS ( | 0.455 | 0.264 | 0.455 | 0.455 | 0.430 | |
In each row, for the Harvest number (HN), the asterisk (*) means different statistical differences among the two harvests, with an overall significance value of 0.05. The presented standard deviations were calculated from results obtained under different operational conditions. Therefore, these values should not be regarded as a measure of precision, rather as the range of the recorded values.
Different bioactive compounds and soluble sugars detected in the two mushroom strains along the two harvests and CS supplementation concentrations.
| Presidente Prudente (PP) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ergosterol | Vitamin D2 | Fructose | Mannitol | Trehalose | Soluble Sugars | Total Tocopherols | |||||
| Harvest number (HN) | First flush | 107 ± 6 | 743 ± 133 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 19 ± 2 | 22 ± 2 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.07 |
| Second flush | 107 ± 8 | 593 ± 73 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 15 ± 4 | 17 ± 4 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.3 ± 0.07 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | |
| Student T test | 0.288 | 0.031 | 0.007 | 0.811 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.580 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Calcium silicate supplementation (CS) | Control | 101 ± 8 | 496 ± 27 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 15 ± 3 | 18 ± 3 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.04 |
| 0.5% | 109 ± 6 | 658 ± 71 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 18 ± 3 | 20 ± 3 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.009 ± 0.004 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | |
| 1% | 110 ± 1 | 734 ± 144 | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 1.91 ± 0.06 | 16 ± 8 | 18 ± 8 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.09 | |
| 2% | 113 ± 1 | 779 ± 90 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 19 ± 1 | 21 ± 2 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | |
| 4% | 101 ± 4 | 671 ± 89 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 18 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.108 ± 0.004 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| HN×CS ( | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Harvest number (HN) | First flush | 111 ± 6 | 899 ± 167 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 19±2 | 21 ± 2 | 0.003±0.001 * | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.09 |
| Second flush | 116 ±10 | 829 ± 175 | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 17 ± 4 | 19 ± 4 | 0.0018 ± 0.0001 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | |
| Student T test | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.062 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Calcium silicate supplementation (CS) | Control | 113 ± 4 | 555 ± 51 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 18 ± 2 | 20 ± 2 | 0.0025 ± 0.0009 | 0.261 ± 0.005 | 0.013 ± 0.003 | 0.28 ± 0.05 |
| 0.5% | 123 ± 1 | 951 ± 90 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 17 ± 5 | 19 ± 6 | 0.0022 ± 0.0003 | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 0.011 ± 0.003 | 0.33 ± 0.08 | |
| 1% | 100 ± 3 | 880 ± 50 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 16 ± 3 | 18 ± 3 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 2% | 117 ± 7 | 1022 ± 31 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 1.63 ± 0.05 | 18 ± 2 | 19 ± 2 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | |
| 4% | 114 ± 6 | 913 ± 30 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 20 ± 2 | 22 ± 2 | 0.0014 ± 0.0007 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.087 ± 0.006 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.130 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| HN×CS ( | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.058 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
In each row, for the Harvest number (HN), the asterisk (*) means different statistical differences among the two harvests, with an overall significance value of 0.05. The presented standard deviations were calculated from results obtained under different operational conditions. Therefore, these values should not be regarded as a measure of precision, rather as the range of the recorded values.
Figure 1EMM plots of the Presidente Prudente mushrooms during the two harvest periods: (a) vitamin D2, (b) γ-tocopherol. EMM plots of Mogi-das-Cruzes at different Si concentrations: (c) total tocopherols.
Fatty acids detected through GC-FID from the two mushroom strains across the two harvest periods and CS supplementation, expressed in relative percentage of themselves. Only fatty acids with a relative above 1% are tabled, although others were identified and quantified.
| Presidente Prudente (PP) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C15:0 | C16:0 | C18:0 | C18:1n9C | C18:2n6c | SFAs | MUFAs | PUFAs | ||
| Harvest number (HN) | First flush | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 11.7 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | 65.8 ± 0.7 | 18.5 ± 0.6 | 14.6 ± 0.3 | 66.8 ± 0.7 |
| Second flush | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 11.9 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 12.5 ± 0.9 | 66 ± 1 | 19 ± 1 | 13.0 ± 0.9 | 67 ± 1 | |
| Student T test | <0.001 | 0.025 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.006 | |
| Calcium silicate supplementation (CS) | Control | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 11.7 ± 0.2 | 2.79 ± 0.06 | 13 ± 1 | 66.6 ± 0.7 | 18.7 ± 0.8 | 14 ± 1 | 67.6 ± 0.6 |
| 0.5% | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 11.8 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 13 ± 1 | 66.4 ± 0.4 | 19.2 ± 0.7 | 13 ±1 | 67.3 ± 0.4 | |
| 1% | 1.3 ± 0.07 | 11.5 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 13.8 ± 0.4 | 66.9 ± 0.3 | 17.8 ± 0.1 | 14.3 ± 0.4 | 67.9 ± 0.4 | |
| 2% | 1.59 ± 0.07 | 12.1 ± 0.8 | 2.80 ± 0.07 | 13.9 ± 0.5 | 64.3 ± 0.8 | 20 ± 1 | 14.5 ± 0.4 | 65.4 ± 0.8 | |
| 4% | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 12.0 ± 0.6 | 2.65 ± 0.09 | 13.9 ± 0.5 | 66 ± 1 | 19.4 ± 0.5 | 13±1 | 67±1 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| HN×CS ( | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Harvest number (HN) | First flush | 1.29 ± 0.06 | 11.6 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 13.6 ± 0.6 | 66.4 ± 0.6 | 18.5 ± 0.6 | 14.1 ± 0.6 | 67.4 ± 0.6 |
| Second flush | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 12.4 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 13 ± 1 | 66 ± 1 | 19.4 ± 0.5 | 13 ± 1 | 67 ± 1 | |
| Student T test | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.543 | <0.001 | 0.045 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.146 | |
| Calcium silicate supplementation (CS) | Control | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 13.9 ± 0.2 | 65 ± 1 | 19 ± 1 | 14.3 ± 0.2 | 66 ± 1 |
| 0.5% | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 11.9 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 13 ± 1 | 66.8 ± 0.5 | 18 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 | 67.7 ± 0.5 | |
| 1% | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 11.9 ± 0.2 | 0.287 ± 0.03 | 13 ± 1 | 67.2 ± 0.8 | 18.6 ± 0.3 | 13.1 ± 0.1 | 68.3 ± 0.9 | |
| 2% | 1.39 ± 0.07 | 12.3 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 12.5 ± 0.1 | 66.6 ± 0.3 | 19.2 ± 0.2 | 13.1 ± 0.1 | 67.7 ± 0.3 | |
| 4% | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 11.9 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 14.0 ± 0.3 | 65.2 ± 0.8 | 19.2 ± 0.4 | 14.6 ± 0.4 | 66.1 ± 0.8 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| HN×CS ( | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
C15:0—Pentadecanoic acid, C16:0—Hexadecanoic acid, C18:0—Octadecanoic acid, C18:1n9C—Octadec-9-enoic acid, C18:2n6c-(9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid (IUPAC nomenclature). SFAs—saturated fatty acids, MUFAs—monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFAs—polyunsaturated fatty acids. In each row, for the Harvest number (HN). The presented standard deviations were calculated from results obtained under different operational conditions. Therefore, these values should not be regarded as a measure of precision, rather as the range of the recorded values.
Figure 2EMM plots of the Presidente Prudente mushrooms at different Si concentrations: (a) C18:1n9c (Octadec-9-enoic acid), (b) Saturated Fatty Acids (SFAs). EMM plots for Mogi-das-Cruzes: (c) SFAs.