Harry M Lightsey1, Alexander M Crawford1, Grace X Xiong1, Andrew J Schoenfeld1, Andrew K Simpson2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA. Electronic address: asimpson@bwh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The role of telemedicine within the realm of spine surgery is evolving, catalyzed by the recent pandemic. Specifically, the capability of this technology to provide high-quality, cost-effective care without an in-person interaction and physical examination remains poorly defined. PURPOSE: To characterize the impact of telemedicine on spine surgical planning by assessing whether surgical plans established in virtual visits changed following in-person evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We evaluated the records of patients who were indicated for surgery with documented specific surgical plans during a virtual encounter (March-July 2020) and underwent subsequent in-person evaluation prior to surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined whether surgical plans changed between the virtual encounter and the in-person interaction. Secondarily, we reviewed use of the virtual physical examination across surgeons. METHODS: We reviewed virtual and in-person clinical encounters from a single academic spine division, evaluating those patients who were seen exclusively via telemedicine encounters and indicated for surgery with documented specific surgical plans. These plans were compared to the surgical plan after these same patients underwent in-person evaluation. Demographic data, patient primary complaint, and the type and extent of physical examination performed by the surgeon were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 33 patients included, the surgical plan did not change among 31 individuals (94%) following in-person interaction. For the two patients where surgical plans were modified, multilevel fusions were increased by one level. There was notable inter- and intra-surgeon variability with regard to the use of virtual physical exams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that telemedicine evaluations are efficient means of preoperative assessment of spine patients and delineation of surgical plans. These results may support innovations that can optimize access to care for patients.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The role of telemedicine within the realm of spine surgery is evolving, catalyzed by the recent pandemic. Specifically, the capability of this technology to provide high-quality, cost-effective care without an in-person interaction and physical examination remains poorly defined. PURPOSE: To characterize the impact of telemedicine on spine surgical planning by assessing whether surgical plans established in virtual visits changed following in-person evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We evaluated the records of patients who were indicated for surgery with documented specific surgical plans during a virtual encounter (March-July 2020) and underwent subsequent in-person evaluation prior to surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined whether surgical plans changed between the virtual encounter and the in-person interaction. Secondarily, we reviewed use of the virtual physical examination across surgeons. METHODS: We reviewed virtual and in-person clinical encounters from a single academic spine division, evaluating those patients who were seen exclusively via telemedicine encounters and indicated for surgery with documented specific surgical plans. These plans were compared to the surgical plan after these same patients underwent in-person evaluation. Demographic data, patient primary complaint, and the type and extent of physical examination performed by the surgeon were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 33 patients included, the surgical plan did not change among 31 individuals (94%) following in-person interaction. For the two patients where surgical plans were modified, multilevel fusions were increased by one level. There was notable inter- and intra-surgeon variability with regard to the use of virtual physical exams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that telemedicine evaluations are efficient means of preoperative assessment of spine patients and delineation of surgical plans. These results may support innovations that can optimize access to care for patients.
Authors: Alexander M Crawford; Harry M Lightsey; Grace X Xiong; Brendan M Striano; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Andrew K Simpson Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-04-18 Impact factor: 2.928
Authors: Ivan B Ye; Alexandra E Thomson; Navid Chowdhury; Brittany Oster; Vincent S Miseo; Julio J Jauregui; Daniel Cavanaugh; Eugene Koh; Daniel Gelb; Steven Ludwig Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2022-04-11
Authors: David N Bernstein; Victor A van de Graaf; Irina Meijers; Anne Portengen; Amanda Klaassen; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Rudolf W Poolman; Diederik H R Kempen Journal: Musculoskeletal Care Date: 2021-11-30