Literature DB >> 33227242

Oxygen Kinetics During Corneal Cross-linking With and Without Supplementary Oxygen.

Theo G Seiler1, Maria A Komninou2, Malavika H Nambiar3, Kaspar Schuerch2, Beatrice E Frueh2, Philippe Büchler3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure and simulate oxygen kinetics during corneal cross-linking at different irradiances with and without supplementary oxygen.
DESIGN: Experimental, laboratory study.
METHODS: In de-epithelialized porcine eyes, a femtosecond-laser-generated tunnel was used to place a fiber probe in corneal depths of 100, 200, and 300 μm to measure the local oxygen concentration. After riboflavin imbibition, the corneas were irradiated at 3, 9, 18, and 30 mW/cm2 while the oxygen concentration was measured. All experiments were performed under normoxic (21%) and hyperoxic (>95%) conditions. The obtained data were used to identify parameters of a numerical model for oxygen consumption and diffusion.
RESULTS: The equilibrium stromal oxygen concentration under atmospheric oxygen at 3 mW/cm2 was 2.3% in 100 μm decreasing to <1% in 300 μm. With 9, 18, and 30 mW/cm2, no oxygen was available in 200 μm, respectively, 100 μm or deeper. Using a hyperoxic environment, the concentration was 50% using 3 mW/cm2 in 100 μm, decreasing to 40% in 300 μm. At 9 mW/cm2, the concentrations were 5%, 3%, and 1% in 100, 200 and 300 μm, respectively. Using 18 and 30 mW/cm2, all oxygen was depleted at 100 μm; however, oxygen half-lives were longer at 18 mW/cm2 than at 30 mW/cm2. The oxygen model was able to reproduce the experiments and indicated an exponential decay with increasing distance to the anterior surface.
CONCLUSION: Supplementary oxygen increases the oxygen availability during corneal cross-linking. At higher irradiances, supplementary oxygen is beneficial and eliminates the bottleneck of oxygen allowing a potentially more efficient cross-linking. The calibrated numerical model can quantify the spatial oxygen concentration related to different scenarios such as irradiance or environmental oxygen concentration.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33227242     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment indications for corneal crosslinking and clinical results of new corneal crosslinking techniques].

Authors:  Klara Borgardts; Johannes Menzel-Severing; Gerd Geerling; Theo G Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Three-year results of accelerated transepithelial cross-linking (30 mW/cm2 × 3 min) for keratoconus: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hitoha Ishii; Junko Yoshida; Tetsuya Toyono; Satoru Yamagami; Tomohiko Usui; Takashi Miyai
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-08

3.  Epithelium-on Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Hypotonic Riboflavin Solution in Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Kenneth A Beckman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 4.  Corneal Cross-Linking: The Evolution of Treatment for Corneal Diseases.

Authors:  Duoduo Wu; Dawn Ka-Ann Lim; Blanche Xiao Hong Lim; Nathan Wong; Farhad Hafezi; Ray Manotosh; Chris Hong Long Lim
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Biomechanics of Ophthalmic Crosslinking.

Authors:  Brecken J Blackburn; Andrew M Rollins; William J Dupps
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.