| Literature DB >> 33226839 |
Jonathan S W Tan1, Samuel H Royle1, Mark A Sephton1.
Abstract
Acidic iron- and sulfur-rich streams are appropriate analogues for the late Noachian and early Hesperian periods of martian history, when Mars exhibited extensive habitable environments. Any past life on Mars may have left behind diagnostic evidence of life that could be detected at the present day. For effective preservation, these remains must have avoided the harsh radiation flux at the martian surface, survived geological storage for billions of years, and remained detectable within their geochemical environment by analytical instrument suites used on Mars today, such as thermal extraction techniques. We investigated the detectability of organic matter within sulfur stream sediments that had been subjected to artificial maturation by hydrous pyrolysis. After maturation, the samples were analyzed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (py-GC-MS) to determine whether organic matter could be detected with this commonly used technique. We find that macromolecular organic matter can survive the artificial maturation process in the presence of iron- and sulfur-rich minerals but cannot be unambiguously distinguished from abiotic organic matter. However, if jarosite and goethite are present in the sulfur stream environment, they interfere with the py-GC-MS detection of organic compounds in these samples. Clay reduces the obfuscating effect of the oxidizing minerals by providing nondeleterious adsorption sites. We also find that after a simple alkali and acid leaching process that removes oxidizing minerals such as iron sulfates, oxides, and oxyhydroxides, the sulfur stream samples exhibit much greater organic responses during py-GC-MS in terms of both abundance and diversity of organic compounds, such as the detection of hopanes in all leached samples. Our results suggest that insoluble organic matter can be preserved over billions of years of geological storage while still retaining diagnostic organic information, but sample selection strategies must either avoid jarosite- and goethite-rich outcrops or conduct preparative chemistry steps to remove these oxidants prior to analysis by thermal extraction techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Alkali/Acid leaching; Artificial maturation; Biosignature; Hydrous pyrolysis; Mars; py-GC-MS
Year: 2020 PMID: 33226839 PMCID: PMC7876361 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2019.2211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Astrobiology ISSN: 1557-8070 Impact factor: 4.335
FIG. 1.Diagrammatic description of the experimental workflow used in this study. The types of fractions are referred to as the following: Untreated clay-poor pyrolysate = CP, no suffix; untreated clay-rich pyrolysate = CR, no suffix; treated clay-poor pyrolysate = CP, “A” suffix; treated clay-rich pyrolysate = CR, “A” suffix.
Samples, Sample Codes, and Conditions Chosen for Hydrous Pyrolysis Experiments
| Sample code | Locality | Water added (mL) | Hydrous pyrolysis temp. (°C) | Alkali and acid treated | XRD data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP-Unmatured | St. Oswald's Bay | N/A | N/A | No | Q:64, G:26, J:10, I:0, K:0, M:0 |
| CP-Unmatured-A | St. Oswald's Bay | N/A | N/A | Yes | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CP-200 | St. Oswald's Bay | 0.1 | 200 | No | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CP-240 | St. Oswald's Bay | 0.1 | 240 | No | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CP-280 | St. Oswald's Bay | 0.1 | 280 | No | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CP-200-A | St. Oswald's Bay | 0.1 | 200 | Yes | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CP-240-A | St. Oswald's Bay | 0.1 | 240 | Yes | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CP-280-A | St. Oswald's Bay | 0.1 | 280 | Yes | Same as CP-Unmatured |
| CR-Unmatured | Stair Hole | N/A | N/A | No | Q:40, G:18, J:6, I:25, K:11, M:0 |
| CR-Unmatured-A | Stair Hole | N/A | N/A | Yes | Same as CR-Unmatured |
| CR-200 | Stair Hole | 0.1 | 200 | No | Same as CR-Unmatured |
| CR-240 | Stair Hole | 0.1 | 240 | No | Same as CR-Unmatured |
| CR-280 | Stair Hole | 0.1 | 280 | No | Same as CR-Unmatured |
| CR-200-A | Stair Hole | 0.1 | 200 | Yes | Same as CR-Unmatured |
| CR-240-A | Stair Hole | 0.1 | 240 | Yes | Same as CR-Unmatured |
| CR-280-A | Stair Hole | 0.1 | 280 | Yes | Same as CR-Unmatured |
All samples were hydrously pyrolyzed for 72 h. XRD data collection and analysis taken from Lewis et al. (2018). Q = quartz; G = goethite; J = jarosite; I = illite; K = kaolinite; M = montmorillonite.
Organic Compounds Observed in Each of the Pyrolyzed Sulfur Stream Samples
| Organic compound | Sample name | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No alkali/acid treatment | Alkali/Acid treated | |||||||||||||||
| Clay-poor sulfur stream | Clay-rich sulfur stream | Clay-poor sulfur stream | Clay-rich sulfur stream | |||||||||||||
| CP-Unmatured | CP-200 | CP-240 | CP-280 | CR-Unmatured | CR-200 | CR-240 | CR-280 | CP-Unmatured-A | CP-200-A | CP-240-A | CP-280-A | CR-Unmatured-A | CR-200-A | CR-240-A | CR-280-A | |
| Benzenes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alkyl-benzenes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Naphthalenes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Indenes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Polyaromatic hydrocarbons | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Pyridines | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Indoles | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| (Benzo)nitriles | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Alkylnitriles | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||
| (Benzo)furans | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Furfural | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||
| Ketones | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Indenone | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Phenols | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Thiophenes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Benzothiophene | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Alkene/Alkane pairs | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Fatty acids | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Hopanes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
FIG. 2.Total ion current (TIC) chromatograms of the untreated clay-poor sulfur stream sample. Note that the samples that had been subjected to hydrous pyrolysis then subjected to py-GC-MS exhibited a low mass peak with a response much greater than the rest of the compounds, and thus had to be scaled to the largest peak after 4 min retention time. Color images are available online.
FIG. 3.TIC of the untreated clay-rich sulfur stream samples. Color images are available online.
FIG. 4.TIC of the alkali/acid treated clay-poor sulfur stream samples. Color images are available online.
FIG. 5.TIC of the alkali/acid treated clay-rich sulfur stream samples. Color images are available online.
Potential Sources of Organic Compounds and Their Pyrolysis Products
| Source | Product | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Fatty acids | ||
| Short-chain fatty acids | ||
| Alkylbenzenes | ||
| Alkylnitriles (if biopolymer contains N) | Ishiwatari | |
| Polysaccharoidal sugars | Furans | Moldoveanu, |
| Benzofurans | ||
| Furfural | ||
| Levoglucosenone | ||
| Glucopyranose | ||
| Phenols | ||
| Proteins | Pyrroles | |
| Pyridines | ||
| Indoles | ||
| Phenols | ||
| Lignin | Phenols | |
| Aliphatic biopolymers | ||
| Alkylnitriles (if biopolymer contains N) | Ishiwatari | |
| Aromatic biopolymers | Indene | |
| Pyrene | ||
| Fluoranthene | ||
| Phenanthrene | ||
| Abiological incorporation of sulfur | Thiophenes | Kohnen |
| Alkylthiophenes | ||
| Bacteria | C16–C18 fatty acids | |
| Domain-specific alkenes | ||
| Hopanes |