Literature DB >> 33226488

Comparison of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage and transvaginal cerclage for the treatment of cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study.

Shuxu Tian1, Shuping Zhao1, Youbin Hu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the pregnancy outcome of patients with cervical insufficiency (CI) underwent prophylactic laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC) and transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC).
METHODS: A retrospective trial was carried out in the Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Shandong Province, China. A total of 217 women with cervical insufficiency underwent the prophylactic cerclage, and the surgical approach was decided by the patients or depended on doctors' advice. The primary outcome measure was the fetal outcome. Secondary outcome measures were delivery of an infant at ≥ 34th gestational weeks, newborn birth weight, neonatal intensive care center (NICU) occupancy, and postoperative complications. Nonparametric variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney (U) test, and categorical type outcomes were analyzed with the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics Version 19.
RESULTS: As of follow-up date, 154 eligible patients were included in this study, with 74 (48.1%) women in the LAC group and 80 (51.9%) in the TVC group. The total fetal survival rate in the two groups was 90.3% (139/154), of which the rate significantly higher in the LAC group compared to the TVC group (97.3% vs. 83.8%, P < 0.01). The delivery of an infant at ≥ 34th gestational weeks was significantly higher in the LAC group compared to the TVC group (94.6% vs. 71.3%, P < 0.01). Compared to the TVC group, the mean newborn birth weight was higher, and the NICU occupancy rate was less in the LAC group (3293.4 ± 542.8 g vs. 2953.6 ± 704.4 g, P = 0.002; 2.8% vs. 17.9%, P = 0.003). COMPLICATIONS: No fatal surgical complications occurred in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In patients with cervical insufficiency, the history-indicated conception of prophylactic LAC appears to have a better pregnancy outcome than TVC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical insufficiency; Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage; Preterm birth; Prophylactic cerclage; Transvaginal cerclage

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33226488     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05893-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  11 in total

1.  Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.

Authors:  Anthony O Odibo; Vincenzo Berghella; Meekai S To; Orion A Rust; Sietske M Althuisius; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A comparison of pregnancy outcome of modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed prior to and during pregnancy.

Authors:  Minling Wei; Xiaoying Jin; T C Li; Cuiyu Yang; Dong Huang; Songying Zhang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  The Feasibility of a Modified Method of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cervicoisthmic Cerclage During Pregnancy.

Authors:  So-Jin Shin; Hyewon Chung; Sang-Hoon Kwon; Soon-Do Cha; Hee-Jung Lee; Ae-Ra Kim; Ilseon Hwang; Chi-Heum Cho
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications.

Authors:  Chian-Huey Wong; Chie-Pein Chen; Kuo-Gon Wang; Fang-Ju Sun; Chen-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-05-05

5.  Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Timothy J Rafael; Jeff M Szychowski; Orion A Rust; John Owen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Prematurity prevention: the role of cerclage.

Authors:  George J Daskalakis
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Operative complications and fetal morbidity encountered in 300 prophylactic transabdominal cervical cerclage procedures by one obstetric surgeon.

Authors:  T L Foster; E S Moore; J E Sumners
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 8.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-06

9.  Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach.

Authors:  Daniele Bolla; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Sabrina Badir; Michael Bajka; Michael D Mueller; Andrea Papadia; Luigi Raio
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Systematic Review of Transabdominal Cerclage Placed via Laparoscopy for the Prevention of Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Gaby N Moawad; Paul Tyan; Tracey Bracke; Elias D Abi Khalil; Vicky Vargas; Alexis Gimovsky; Cherie Marfori
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.137

View more
  3 in total

1.  Analysis of the Timing of Cervical Cerclage Treatment in Pregnant Women with Cervical Insufficiency and the Effect on Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  Deying He; Dan Zhao
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Removal of laparoscopic cerclage stitches via laparotomy and rivanol-induced labour: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xin-Ni Na; Ben-Shuo Cai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Comparison of transvaginal cervical cerclage versus laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study from a single centre.

Authors:  Haiyan Yu; Xiaodong Wang; Guiqiong Huang; Chunyan Deng; Hua Liao; Qing Hu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.