| Literature DB >> 33225939 |
Kimberly R Jordan1,2, Jessica K Hall3, Troy Schedin3, Michelle Borakove3, Jenny J Xian4, Monika Dzieciatkowska5, Traci R Lyons3, Pepper Schedin6, Kirk C Hansen5, Virginia F Borges7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small membrane particles that contribute to cancer progression and metastases by transporting biologically significant proteins and nucleic acids. They may also serve as biomarkers of various disease states or important therapeutic targets. Breast cancer EVs have the potential to change the behavior of other cells in their microenvironment. However, the proteomic content of EVs isolated from young women's breast cancer patients and the mechanisms underlying the influence of EVs on tumor cell behavior have not yet been reported.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Exosomes; Extracellular vesicles; Nanoparticles; Proteomics; Young women’s breast cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33225939 PMCID: PMC7681773 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01363-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res ISSN: 1465-5411 Impact factor: 6.466
Fig. 1EVs increase the motility and invasion of breast cancer cells. a MDA-MB231 and MCF10-DCIS.com cells were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Fractions 5–10 were combined and characterized by NTA and BCA assay (b) and western blot (c). Human EV positive control was purchased from System Biosciences, consisting of EVs purified using Exoquick (System Biosciences). To demonstrate the effects of glycosylation, SEC-purified human EVs were treated with N-glycosidase F and blotted for CD63 primary ab. The lower bands (~ 25 kDa) in Hsp70 and CD63 blots are likely non-specific. d MCF10-DCIS.com cells were seeded ± 5 × 108 EVs in 96-well plates coated with 0.5 mg/ml Matrigel, and phase contrast images were taken over 96 h using an IncuCyte instrument after wounding. e For the invasion assays, cells were plated as in d and covered with a 2-mg/ml Matrigel pad after wounding. Cell invasion was determined ± 5 × 108 EVs over 36 h using an IncuCyte instrument. Averages of at least 4 independent experiments, each with 4 to 5 replicate wells, are shown. Groups were compared using two-way ANOVA, and p values were adjusted for multiple repeated measures. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean
Abundant proteins identified uniquely in MDA-MB231 or MCF10DCIS.com EVs purified from cell culture supernatants
| MDA-MB231 EVs | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein name | No. of spectral matchesA | Protein name | No. of spectral matchesA |
| Complement C4-B | 140.2 | Protocadherin fat 2 | 264.6 |
| EGF-like repeat and discoidin I-like protein 3 | 101.7 | Laminin subunit beta-3 | 238.6 |
| Vitronectin | 101.2 | Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2 | 200.7 |
| Annexin A6 | 88.5 | CD109 antigen | 196.8 |
| NUMA1 variant protein | 88.3 | Retinoic acid receptor responder protein 1 | 189.0 |
| Filamin-C | 50.3 | Prostaglandin F2 receptor negative regulator | 160.1 |
| Thioredoxin reductase 1 | 47.5 | Laminin, alpha 4 | 147.3 |
| Collagen, type V, alpha 1 | 44.4 | Syndecan-1 | 139.9 |
| Proteasome subunit beta type-4 | 39.4 | Protocadherin fat 1 | 110.0 |
| Filamin-A | 38.2 | Stromal cell derived factor 4 | 108.3 |
| U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein | 37.9 | Epithelial cell adhesion molecule | 105.3 |
| Early endosome antigen 1 | 37.6 | Protein S100-A14 | 97.3 |
| Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase | 36.2 | SPARC related modular calcium binding 1 | 83.9 |
| Proteasome subunit alpha type-1 | 32.4 | Fibulin-1 | 68.9 |
| Interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 | 30.8 | Suppressor of tumorigenicity 14 protein | 65.6 |
| 60S ribosomal protein L12 | 28.7 | Catenin, beta 1 | 59.4 |
| Ubiquitin-like protein ISG15 | 27.8 | Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E | 56.1 |
| Aspartate-tRNA ligase | 25.6 | Follistatin | 48.0 |
| Proteasome subunit beta type 7 | 24.5 | Collagen alpha-1 | 45.2 |
| Serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 | 23.1 | Claudin | 45.1 |
| 26S proteasome non-ATPase subunit 6 | 22.1 | Amphiregulin | 44.0 |
| Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 | 21.5 | Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor | 43.8 |
| Ferritin light chain | 20.8 | Fascin | 42.5 |
| 26S protease subunit 8 | 20.6 | Plakophilin-3 | 41.5 |
| 60S ribosomal protein L27 | 19.8 | Isoform 4 of scavenger receptor class B1 | 40.5 |
| SARS protein | 19.3 | Solute carrier 16, member 1 | 37.1 |
Of the 1109 proteins identified in MCF10DCIS.com EVs and the 1032 proteins identified in MDA-MB231 EVs, 632 proteins were shared between the two cell lines
ASpectral matches are the averages of two independent EV preparations
Fig. 2EVs isolated from YWBC patients promote increased invasion of MCF10DCIS.com breast cancer cells. EVs isolated from human YWBC patients or healthy donor (HD) plasma samples by size-exclusion chromatography were incubated with MCF10DCIS.com human breast cancer cells in a scratch wound assay overlaid with a Matrigel pad. Phase images were taken every 2 h using an IncuCyte instrument. After 48 h, images were analyzed using IncuCyte ZOOM software. a Mean diameter and number of EVs isolated from YWBC plasma or HD plasma. b Electron microscope images of YWBC EV and HD EV. c Representative images of the invasion assay showing the initial scratch wound (t0) and after 20 h (t20). The percentage invasion at each time point was calculated from the density of cells in each wound (shown in yellow) relative to the initial wound (shown in purple). d The average percent invasion of 4 replicate wells was plotted over time. Representative data for untreated MCF10DCIS.com cells (gray) or treated with EVs from a YWBC patient (blue) or HD (black). e The average percent invasion at the time point when untreated controls reached 50% confluence was compared to individual treatments using Student’s t test (left). The average percent invasion for each condition was compared using one-way ANOVA with a multiple comparisons test (right). There was no significant difference between untreated cells and those treated with EVs from healthy donors
Fig. 3EVs from YWBC patients have a unique proteomic signature. EVs from 20 YWBC patients and 10 healthy donors were purified by size-exclusion chromatography and analyzed by mass spectrometry. The identified proteins were analyzed using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 software. a Of the 583 proteins identified, EVs from YWBC patients contain 94 unique proteins compared to EVs from healthy donors. b Multivariate analysis was performed using the partial least squares discriminant analysis method. Variables were sorted into components according to their ability to discriminate between YWBC patients and healthy donors (HD). The 3D plot of component 1 (A = 0.83, R2 = 0.82, Q2 = 0.50), component 2 (A = 0.97, R2 = 0.82, Q2 = 0.71), and component 3 (A = 0.96, R2 = 0.97, Q2 = 0.64) is shown, in which the number of spectral matches for proteins in these groups distinguishes YWBC (blue) from HD (black). A volcano plot analysis was performed using MetaboAnalyst 3.0, comparing the proteomic differences between EVs from YWBC patients and HD (c) or EVs with functional activity in Fig. 2 and those with no effect (d). Fold change values are represented on the x-axis, and t test p values are represented on the y-axis (see Additional file 4 for specifics). Proteins of interest for breast cancer are labeled
EVs alter expression of genes related to cancer progression in treated MCF10DCIS.com breast cancer cells
NanoString analysis of differential gene expression in MCF10DCIS.com cells after treatment with EVs from YWBC patients, healthy donors (HD), MDA-231 cells, or untreated controls identified via nSolver software. Genes associated with invasion (EMT, metastasis, or cell motility) are shown in yellow, cell adhesion in green, angiogenesis in blue, and proliferation and tumor growth in orange. Negative log2FC values indicate decreases in gene expression in MCF10DCIS.com cells treated with EVs from YWBC patients relative to those treated with HD (left) or in cells treated with EVs from MDA-MB231 cells relative to untreated cells (right)
Fig. 4EVs alter expression of genes in the FAK pathway in treated MCF10DCIS.com breast cancer cells. MCF10DCIS.com cells were incubated with EVs from YWBC patients, healthy donors (HD), or MDA231 breast cancer cells for 18 h prior to RNA isolation. Gene expression related to cancer pathways and cancer progression was measured using NanoString technology. Data were normalized and statistical analysis performed using the NanoString nSolver3.0 analysis software. Heatmap of the top 8 genes related to the FAK pathway comparing MCF10DCIS.com cells treated with EVs from YWBC patients to HD (left) or from invasive MDA231 breast cancer cells to untreated controls (right), *p < 0.05
Fig. 5FAK pathway inhibition attenuates increased invasion after EV treatment. Invasion assays were performed and analyzed as described above treating MCF10DCIS.com cells with EVs isolated from MDA.MB231 cells in the presence and absence of a FAK inhibitor (PF.573.228). a Incubation with FAK inhibitor decreases phosphorylated FAK protein as detected by flow cytometry. b Representative images of cell densities (yellow) overlaid with initial scratch wounds (purple). c The average percent invasion of 4 replicate wells containing MCF10DCIS.com cells treated with EVs ± 3 μM FAK inhibitor