| Literature DB >> 33225300 |
Febrika Wediasari1, Gumilar A Nugroho1, Zahra Fadhilah1, Berna Elya1, Heri Setiawan2, Tjandrawati Mozef3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Researchers usually use herbal combinations to explore and develop traditional medicine to obtain additional benefits in the treatment of diseases, including diabetes. This study aims to evaluate the hypoglycemic effect of the combination of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall ex Nees and Caesalpinia sappan Linn extract (APCSE) on diabetes-induced rats. There has not been sufficient research on this combination; however, single extract studies of these plants have been widely conducted.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33225300 PMCID: PMC7671818 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8856129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci ISSN: 2633-4690
Figure 1(a) Body weight changes, (b) random (nonfasting) blood glucose, and (c) fasting blood glucose. Changes in rats. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5). Significantly different from NC (p < 0.05;∗∗p < 0.01) and significantly different from DM (#p < 0.05;##p < 0.01).
Lipid profiles after treatment.
| Groups | Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglyceride (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC ( | 86.39 ± 4.59 | 83.85 ± 2.34 | 72.86 ± 4.77 | 55.05 ± 3.43 |
| DM ( | 88.05 ± 4.83 | 95.54 ± 7.56 | 72.89 ± 4.77 | 54.36 ± 3.27 |
| MET ( | 82.29 ± 10.46 | 117.71 ± 23.05 | 62.51 ± 8.86 | 46.25 ± 4.77 |
| APE ( | 74.70 ± 1.56 | 103.36 ± 9.41 | 55.92 ± 3.58 | 42.84 ± 1.29 |
| CSE ( | 89.33 ± 8.41 | 188.70 ± 42.00∗∗# | 68.01 ± 4.45 | 37.99 ± 2.43 |
| APCSE100 ( | 94.70 ± 5.05 | 176.58 ± 35.42 | 70.49 ± 5.05 | 57.63 ± 17.52 |
| APCSE200 ( | 88.36 ± 4.84 | 107.93 ± 5.91 | 68.80 ± 3.62 | 49.82 ± 3.24 |
The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Significantly different from NC (p < 0.05;∗∗p < 0.01) and significantly different from DM (#p < 0.05).
Figure 2(a) Immunohistochemistry staining of pancreatic islets. (A) Section of the pancreas of the NC group showing immunoreactivity of insulin in β-cells occupying most of the islets; (B) the pancreas of the DM group showing a reduction in the immunohistochemistry expression of insulin in β-cells; (C) section from the MET group (diabetic rats + metformin) showing an apparent increase in the number and area of β-cells compared with the DM group; (D) section from the APE group (diabetic rats + APE 100 mg) showing an apparent increase in the number and area of β-cells compared with the DM group; (E) pancreas from the CSE group (diabetic rats + CSE 100 mg) showing an apparent increase in the number and area of β-cells compared with DM group; (F) section from the APCSE100 group (diabetic rats + APCSE 100 mg) showing a lower density of insulin expressing β-cells; (G) the area from the APCSE200 group (diabetic rats + APCSE 200 mg) showing an increase in insulin expressing β-cells with normal density. (b) β-Cell count of the pancreas. Results presented are mean ± SEM; significantly different from DM (#p < 0.05;##p < 0.01) and significantly different from normal (p < 0.05;∗∗p < 0.01).
Figure 3(a) Histological interpretation of the adipose tissue in rats (H&E, 40x). (A) Section from the NC group showing large adipocytes of normal rats; (B) section from diabetic rats of the DM group showing large adipocytes cells; (C) section from the MET group (diabetic rats + metformin) showing large adipocytes; (D) section from APE groups (diabetic rats + APE 100 mg) showing mixed adipocytes large and small, mostly massive; (E) CSE group (diabetic rats + CSE 100 mg) showing mixed adipocytes with large and small cells, mostly small sizes; (F) APCSE100 and (G) APCSE200 offer diverse cell sizes, but most are the smaller size of adipocytes. (b) Adipocyte cell count. Adipocyte cell count in the CSE, APCSE100, and APCSE200 groups was significantly different compared to the DM group. Results presented are mean ± SEM; significantly different from DM (#p < 0.05;##p < 0.01) and significantly different from normal (p < 0.05;∗∗p < 0.01).