| Literature DB >> 33224902 |
Claudia Grehn1, Patience Eschenhagen1, Svenja Temming1, Uta Düesberg2, Konrad Neumann3, Carsten Schwarz1.
Abstract
Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) frequently colonizes the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and can cause severe diseases, such as allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Af bronchitis or even Af pneumonia. However, risk factors, including environmental factors, for acquiring Af in the respiratory tract of patients with CF are rarely studied and described. The aim of this study was to investigate whether urban or rural life could affect colonization with Af in the respiratory tract of patients with CF. Due to privacy policy, registry data are usually not linked to patients´ home addresses. It is therefore very difficult to analyze the influence of the patient´s residential environment. This prospective questionnaire survey was carried out in 31 German CF centers in 2018. Only completed surveys, including a clearly assigned type of residential area were included. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-squared test and logistic regression models. A total of 1016 questionnaires were analyzed (Patients` age: 23 ± 13; 0-88 years; female gender: n=492; 48%). The majority of patients with CF live in large cities (n =314; 30.9%) or urban districts (n=461; 45.4%). Prevalence of 30.2% was found for Af, within the 12 months of investigation period. Af colonization was significantly associated with urban life (p=0.004). Urban live should be considered as possible new risk factor for colonization with Af in the respiratory tract of patients with CF. These new results may raise the awareness of the influence of environmental factors on patient outcomes and should be included in patient guidance and preventive measures.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus; allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; aspergillosis; cystic fibrosis; respiratory infection; rural life; urban life
Year: 2020 PMID: 33224902 PMCID: PMC7667220 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.601834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Demographic baseline characteristics.
| All CF patients | CF patients < 18 years | CF patients ≥ 18 years | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1016 (100 %) | 395 (38.9 %) | 621 (61.1%) | ||
| Female sex, n (%) | 492 (48.4%) | 197 (49.9%) | 295 (47.5%) | 0.461 |
| Age (years), mean ± SD (range) | 23 ± 13 (0 - 88) | 10 ± 5 (0–17) | 31 ± 10 (18–88) | |
|
| 307 (30.2%) | 73 (18.5%) | 234 (37.7%) | <0.001 |
| ABPA | 165 (16.2%) | 30 (7.6%) | 135 (21.7%) | <0.001 |
| Type of residential area, n (%) | ||||
| Large city | 314 (30.9 %) | 91 (23.0%) | 223 (35.9%) | <0.001 |
| Urban district | 461 (45.4 %) | 186 (47.1%) | 275 (44.3%) | 0.401 |
| Rural district | 141 (13.9 %) | 68 (17.2%) | 73 (11.8%) | 0.016 |
| Sparsely populated rural area | 100 (9.8 %) | 50 (12.7%) | 50 (8.0%) | 0.018 |
| Population density, n (%) | ||||
| High | 137 (13.5%) | 46 (11.6%) | 91 (14.7%) | 0.188 |
| Medium | 601 (59.2%) | 213 (53.9%) | 388 (62.5%) | 0.007 |
| Low | 278 (27.4%) | 136 (34.5%) | 142 (22.8%) | <0.001 |
During 12 months observation period.
Af colonization and ABPA diagnosis in different types of residential area for all included CF patients.
| All included CF patients, n = 1016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large city, n = 314 | Urban district, n = 461 | Rural district, n = 141 | Sparsely populated rural area, n = 100 | P value | |
|
| 115 (36.6 %) | 138 (29.9 %) | 34 (24.1 %) | 20 (20.0%) | 0.004 |
| ABPA, n (%) | 64 (20.4%) | 67 (14.5%) | 16 (11.3%) | 18 (18%) | 0.054 |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 22 (24.2 %) | 33 (17.7%) | 8 (11.8 %) | 10 (20.0%) | 0.247 |
| ABPA, n (%) | 11 (12.1%) | 6 (3.2%) | 7 (10.3%) | 6 (12.0%) | 0.021 |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 93 (41.7 %) | 105 (38.2 %) | 26 (35.6 %) | 10 (20.0%) | 0.039 |
| ABPA, n (%) | 53 (23.8%) | 61 (22.2%) | 9 (12.3%) | 12 (24.0%) | 0.210 |
Adjusted odds ratios for age and residential areas of Af colonization.
| All included CF patients, n = 1016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | P value | ||
| Age (years) | 1.028 | 1.017 – 1.038 | <0.001 | |
| Residential area | – | – | 0.019 | |
| Large city (vs sparsely populated rural area) | 2.114 | 1.220 – 3.661 | 0.008 | |
| Urban district (vs sparsely populated rural area) | 1.724 | 1.008 – 2.949 | 0.047 | |
| Rural district (vs sparsely populated rural area) | 1.265 | 0.672 – 2.383 | 0.466 | |
Af and ABPA documentation in relation to population density for all included CF patients.
| All included CF patients, n = 1016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population density | P value | |||
| High, n = 137 | Medium, n = 601 | Low, n = 278 | ||
|
| 45 (32.8%) | 187 (31.1%) | 75 (27.0%) | 0.357 |
| ABPA, n (%) | 21 (15.3%) | 101 (16.8%) | 43 (15.5%) | 0.871 |
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 10 (21.7%) | 42 (19.7%) | 21 (15.4%) | 0.503 |
| ABPA, n (%) | 4 (8.7%) | 9 (4.2%) | 17 (12.5%) | 0.017 |
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 35 (38.5%) | 145 (37.4%) | 54 (38.0%) | 0.977 |
| ABPA, n (%) | 17 (18.7%) | 92 (23.7%) | 26 (18.3%) | 0.306 |