Literature DB >> 33224792

Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy.

Kwangsoon Kim1, Sang-Wook Kang2, Jin Kyong Kim2, Cho Rok Lee2, Jandee Lee2, Jong Ju Jeong2, Kee-Hyun Nam2, Woong Youn Chung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive thyroidectomy (MIT) is a safe method of performing thyroidectomy with notable benefits, such as improved cosmesis and reduced postoperative pain. The objective of this retrospective study was to report our experience with the technical feasibility of MIT, and compare its early surgical outcomes with those of conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).
METHODS: A total of 617 patients who underwent MIT and 2,674 patients who underwent COT were reviewed between March 2006 and November 2017 at Yonsei University (Seoul, Korea). The mean follow-up duration was 41.2±19.7 months.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients with DTC was 46.1±11.2 years. The mean operation time in the MIT group was significantly shorter than that of the COT group (63.5±26.2 vs. 85.3±36.8 minutes, P<0.001). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MIT group than it was in the COT group as well (2.7±0.6 vs. 3.1±0.8 days, P<0.001). There were significantly fewer painkillers used after surgery in the MIT group than in the COT group (1.2±0.5 vs. 2.7±1.6, P<0.001). The mean number of harvested LNs in the MIT group was significantly lower than that of the COT group (3.1±2.6 vs. 5.5±4.0, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that MIT is technically feasible in patients with DTC. MIT is a valuable alternative operative technique to COT with good surgical outcomes and outstanding cosmetic results. 2020 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thyroidectomy; differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC); minimally invasive surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33224792      PMCID: PMC7667120          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  23 in total

1.  Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy.

Authors:  C S Park; W Y Chung; H S Chang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of quality of life between open and endoscopic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Hoon Park; Byeong-Cheol Lee; Guk-Haeng Lee; Ik Joon Choi
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 3.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.568

4.  Lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy for differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  J P Shah; T R Loree; D Dharker; E W Strong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Prospects of robotic thyroidectomy using a gasless, transaxillary approach for the management of thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Jae Hyun Park; Jun Soo Jeong; Cho Rok Lee; Seulkee Park; So Hee Lee; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 6.  Differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  William R Burns; Martha A Zeiger
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Highlights from endocrine surgical history.

Authors:  R B Welbourn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system.

Authors:  I D Hay; C S Grant; W F Taylor; W M McConahey
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2013.

Authors:  Chang-Mo Oh; Young-Joo Won; Kyu-Won Jung; Hyun-Joo Kong; Hyunsoon Cho; Jong-Keun Lee; Duk Hyoung Lee; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 10.  Ultrasonography Diagnosis and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hee Shin; Jung Hwan Baek; Jin Chung; Eun Joo Ha; Ji-Hoon Kim; Young Hen Lee; Hyun Kyung Lim; Won-Jin Moon; Dong Gyu Na; Jeong Seon Park; Yoon Jung Choi; Soo Yeon Hahn; Se Jeong Jeon; So Lyung Jung; Dong Wook Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Chang Yoon Lee; Hui Joong Lee; Jeong Hyun Lee; Joon Hyung Lee; Kwang Hui Lee; Sun-Won Park; Jin Young Sung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Supraclavicular Oblique Incision With Traditional Low Collar Incision Approach for Thyroidectomy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Bo Jiang; Cheng Qu; Chaoyu Jiang; Chen Zhang; Song Shen; Yuqian Luo; Lei Su
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.