| Literature DB >> 33224247 |
Abstract
In December, 2019 in Wuhan city of China, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has garnered global attention due to its rapid transmission. World Health Organization (WHO) termed the infection as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) after phylogenic studies with SARS-CoV. The virus causes severe respiratory infections with dry cough, high fever, body ache and fatigue. The virus is primarily transmitted among people through respiratory droplets from COVID-19 infected person. WHO declared this COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic and since February, 2020 affected countries have locked down their cities, industries and restricted the movement of their citizens to minimize the spread of the virus. In spite of the negative aspects of coronavirus on the globe, the coronavirus crises brought a positive impact on the natural environment. Countries where the movement of citizens was seized to stop the spread of coronavirus infection have experienced a noticeable decline in pollution and greenhouse gases emission. Recent research also indicated that this COVID-19-induced lockdown has reduced the environmental pollution drastically worldwide. In this review, we have discussed some important positive impacts of coronavirus on environmental quality by compiling the recently published data from research articles, NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) and ESA (European Space Agency). © Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; COVID-19; Carbon emission; NO2 emission; Ozone layer; Water quality
Year: 2020 PMID: 33224247 PMCID: PMC7668666 DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-03021-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran) ISSN: 1735-1472 Impact factor: 2.860
PM2.5 levels in some of the most polluted cities of the world during the period of COVID-19-induced lockdown
| City | Average PM2.5 | Reduction | Average reduction compared | Lockdown period, |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delhi, India | 32.8 | − 60% | − 55% | March 23–April 13 |
| London, UK | 16.2 | − 9% | + 6% | March 23–April 13 |
| Los Angeles, US | 5.5 | − 31% | − 51% | March 23–April 13 |
| Madrid, Spain | 6.4 | − 11% | + 2% | March 23–April 13 |
| New York City, US | 4.4 | − 25% | − 29% | March 23–April 13 |
| São Paulo, Brazil | 10.1 | − 32% | − 26% | March 23 − April 13 |
| Seoul, South Korea | 24.1 | − 54% | − 32% | Feb 26–March 18 |
| Wuhan, China | 35.1 | − 44% | − 50% | Feb 3–Feb 24 |
| Lahore, Pakistan | 25 | − 63% | − 59% | March 23–April 13 |
Fig. 1NO2 emissions in China before and after lockdown. (ESA 2020)
Fig. 2Approx. reductions in NO2 levels across main cities in Pakistan (1st March–15th April)
Fig. 3The concentrations of nitrogen dioxide over Europe from 13 March till 13 April 2020, compared to the average concentrations from March–April, 2019
Fig. 4Satellite estimates of NO2 over major cities of Southwest USA
Fig. 5Satellite estimates of NO2 over Southeast USA
Fig. 6Decrease in carbon emissions after COVID-19 lockdown
Fig. 7The concentration of ozone over Arctic regions in March 12, 2019 (a) in comparison with March 12, 2020 (b)
COVID-19 community mobility reports of different countries
| Location | Retail and recreation | Grocery and pharmacy | Parks, public beaches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | − 59% | − 41% | − 34% |
| Italy | − 78% | − 37% | − 37% |
| USA | − 34% | − 4% | + 28% |
| UK | − 78% | − 30% | − 18% |
| Spain | − 84% | − 31% | − 43% |
| India | − 85% | − 44% | − 64% |
| Saudi Arabia | − 60% | − 34% | − 65% |
| Bangladesh | − 72% | − 52% | − 36% |
| Germany | − 46% | + 3% | − 18% |