| Literature DB >> 33223984 |
Samira Akhbarifar1, Hamid Haj Seyyed Javadi2, Amir Masoud Rahmani1, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh3,4.
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) and smart medical devices have improved the healthcare systems by enabling remote monitoring and screening of the patients' health conditions anywhere and anytime. Due to an unexpected and huge increasing in number of patients during coronavirus (novel COVID-19) pandemic, it is considerably indispensable to monitor patients' health condition continuously before any serious disorder or infection occur. According to transferring the huge volume of produced sensitive health data of patients who do not want their private medical information to be revealed, dealing with security issues of IoT data as a major concern and a challenging problem has remained yet. Encountering this challenge, in this paper, a remote health monitoring model that applies a lightweight block encryption method for provisioning security for health and medical data in cloud-based IoT environment is presented. In this model, the patients' health statuses are determined via predicting critical situations through data mining methods for analyzing their biological data sensed by smart medical IoT devices in which a lightweight secure block encryption technique is used to ensure the patients' sensitive data become protected. Lightweight block encryption methods have a crucial effective influence on this sort of systems due to the restricted resources in IoT platforms. Experimental outcomes show that K-star classification method achieves the best results among RF, MLP, SVM, and J48 classifiers, with accuracy of 95%, precision of 94.5%, recall of 93.5%, and f-score of 93.99%. Therefore, regarding the attained outcomes, the suggested model is successful in achieving an effective remote health monitoring model assisted by secure IoT data in cloud-based IoT platforms. © Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Block encryption; Data mining; Health monitoring systems; Internet of Things; Security
Year: 2020 PMID: 33223984 PMCID: PMC7667219 DOI: 10.1007/s00779-020-01475-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pers Ubiquitous Comput ISSN: 1617-4909
Comparing factors in the previous works vs. the proposed model
| Reference | Architecture/framework | Applied technology | Security | Lightweight encryption method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | ✓ | Cloud | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✓ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✓ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✓ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✓ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✘ | Not mentioned | ✘ | ✘ |
| [ | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✘ | ✘ |
| Our proposed model | ✓ | Cloud-based IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
Fig. 1The proposed secure remote health monitoring model in cloud-based IoT environment
Fig. 2Workflow graph of the suggested secure health monitoring model
Details of required IoT device data in the proposed secure health monitoring model
| 1. IoT device data | 2. IoT device data |
|---|---|
• Patient’s National id • Name • Gender • Age • Occupation • Address • Mobile phone | • Weight • Height • Smoker/Hookah • Alcohol user • Drug abuser • Hypercholesterolemia (HCLS) history • HLCS duration • HCLS control • Drug user • Hypertension (HTN) history • HTN duration • HTN control |
Details of required IoT medical device sensor data in the proposed secure health monitoring model
| IoT medical device sensor data | |
|---|---|
• Respiratory rate (RR) • Heart rate (HR) • Isolated systolic blood pressure (SBP) • Isolated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) • Oral temperature (OT) • O2 saturation (O2SAT) • Cholesterol • HDL cholesterol • LDL cholesterol • Triglycerides |
Required mathematical definitions
| Definition | Equation |
|---|---|
| Definition 1: A Hyperelliptic curve | Here, the |
| Definition 2: Divisor |
Combinations of the considered diseases
| Disease no. | Disease types |
|---|---|
| 1 | None |
| 2 | HCLS |
| 3 | HCLS, HTN1 |
| 4 | HCLS, HTN2 |
| 5 | HCLS, HTN3 |
| 6 | HCLS, HTN4 |
| 7 | HCLS, HD |
| 8 | HCLS, HTN1, HD |
| 9 | HCLS, HTN2, HD |
| 10 | HCLS, HTN3, HD |
| 11 | HCLS, HTN4, HD |
Fig. 3.The workflow of diagnosing the combinations of HCLS, HTN, and HD
Main features for predicting hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and heart disease
Fig. 4Accuracy for different folds
Fig. 5Precision for different folds
Fig. 6Recall for different folds
Fig. 7F-score for different folds
Evaluation results for the proposed S-Box method
| Algorithm | Nonlinearity | Min degree | Max degree |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRESENT | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Proposed S-Box | 4 | 4 | 4 |