Literature DB >> 33223705

Graftless solution for multiple unfavorably placed implants using dynamic abutment® solutions: A case report with a 3-year follow-up.

Chandrasekhar Nakka1, Soujanya Kollipara1, Kothuri Naga Ravalika1.   

Abstract

The employment of implant-supported crowns and bridges has become a well-established and preferred approach in replacing missing teeth. A favorable implant position is mandatory to obtain good esthetic results and ideal emergence of screw access hole. Usually, unfavorably placed implants are the result of insufficient bone volume which leads to implant trajectory in the available bone. Once placed, they are restored giving a cement-retained prosthesis to avoid labial/buccal screw access holes. A graftless solution for this scenario may be using an angulated screw channel technology which corrects the prosthetic screw access hole emergence in an alternative direction which is more esthetic and acceptable. Dynamic Abutment® Solutions system is unique and exclusive and can be used as a true alternative to titanium-angulated abutments or customized Ti abutments designed through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technologies. The Dynamic Abutment® solutions system rectifies angulation issues with millimetric precision up to 30° with full freedom of movement. This case report explains a case where a two-implant supported fixed partial denture was employed in the esthetic zone using Dynamic Abutment® Solutions system with angulation rectification by a graftless procedure. Copyright:
© 2020 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angulated screw channel; computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing; dental implants; graftless; screw retained

Year:  2020        PMID: 33223705      PMCID: PMC7654193          DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_362_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  9 in total

Review 1.  A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.

Authors:  Rola Shadid; Nasrin Sadaqa
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics.

Authors:  Ueli Grunder; Stefano Gracis; Matteo Capelli
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates.

Authors:  Irena Sailer; Sven Mühlemann; Marcel Zwahlen; Christoph H F Hämmerle; David Schneider
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Replacement of missing anterior tooth using screw retained implant prosthesis in the esthetic zone: a case report with 3 years of follow up.

Authors:  Manawar Ahmad; B Dhanasekar; I N Aparna; Hina Naim
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-19

Review 5.  The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review.

Authors:  William C Martin; Adrien Pollini; Dean Morton
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures.

Authors:  Theodoros Kapos; Christopher Evans
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest.

Authors:  D P Tarnow; S C Cho; S S Wallace
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 8.  Screw-retained crown restorations of single implants: A step-by-step clinical guide.

Authors:  Mohammad Assaf; Alaa' Z Abu Gharbyeh
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-10

9.  Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present.

Authors:  Manikandan Ramasamy; Ramesh Raja; Rachuri Narendrakumar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2013-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.