José Roberto Luzzi1, Claudio C Borba2, Sandra C Miyaji1, Cristina A Brito1, Roberta Navarro-Xavier1, Carla L Dinardo3. 1. Unidade de Hemoterapia e Hematologia Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Unidade de Hemoterapia e Hematologia Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Unidade de Hemoterapia e Hematologia Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil; Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: caludinardo@gmail.com.
Abstract
RATIONAL: Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) procedures in pediatric patients are challenging due to the large extracorporeal volume of the cell separators, which were designed for adults. Red blood cell (RBC) priming is an alternative for overpassing the risks of hypovolemia, but data referring to the volume of packed RBCs to be infused are yet incomplete. Restricting the volume of RBC priming may potentially be associated with less transfusion reactions. GOAL: To determine the safety of administering a reduced volume of RBC priming for pediatric patients undergoing TPE, in comparison to the standard volume recommended by the cell separators' manufacturers. METHODS: This was a case-control study which enrolled 15 pediatric patients undergoing TPE and weighting more than 10Kg. The TPE procedures (n = 406) were divided in two groups: 1) Group1: TPE with ≤150 mL of packed RBC priming and 2) Group2: TPE with 150-250 mL of RBC priming. Groups were compared in terms of hemoglobin / hematocrit and occurrence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Group1 and Group2 did not differ significantly in relation to pre- and post-TPE hemoglobin (Hb) levels (p = 0.19 and p = 0.18, respectively). The Δ Hb (Hb pre-TPE - Hb post-TPE) was also not statistically different between the groups. The number of adverse reactions was significantly higher in Group 2 in relation to Group 1 (p = 0.01). The number of allergic reactions was also higher in Group 2 (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Restricting the volume of RBC priming to less than 150 mL is safe for pediatric patients weighting more than 10Kg and associated with lower rates of transfusion-related adverse reactions.
RATIONAL: Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) procedures in pediatric patients are challenging due to the large extracorporeal volume of the cell separators, which were designed for adults. Red blood cell (RBC) priming is an alternative for overpassing the risks of hypovolemia, but data referring to the volume of packed RBCs to be infused are yet incomplete. Restricting the volume of RBC priming may potentially be associated with less transfusion reactions. GOAL: To determine the safety of administering a reduced volume of RBC priming for pediatric patients undergoing TPE, in comparison to the standard volume recommended by the cell separators' manufacturers. METHODS: This was a case-control study which enrolled 15 pediatric patients undergoing TPE and weighting more than 10Kg. The TPE procedures (n = 406) were divided in two groups: 1) Group1: TPE with ≤150 mL of packed RBC priming and 2) Group2: TPE with 150-250 mL of RBC priming. Groups were compared in terms of hemoglobin / hematocrit and occurrence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Group1 and Group2 did not differ significantly in relation to pre- and post-TPE hemoglobin (Hb) levels (p = 0.19 and p = 0.18, respectively). The Δ Hb (Hb pre-TPE - Hb post-TPE) was also not statistically different between the groups. The number of adverse reactions was significantly higher in Group 2 in relation to Group 1 (p = 0.01). The number of allergic reactions was also higher in Group 2 (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Restricting the volume of RBC priming to less than 150 mL is safe for pediatric patients weighting more than 10Kg and associated with lower rates of transfusion-related adverse reactions.
Authors: Olivier Hequet; Camille Boisson; Philippe Joly; Daniela Revesz; Kamila Kebaili; Alexandra Gauthier; Celine Renoux; Severine Creppy; Elie Nader; Jean François Nicolas; Frédéric Berard; Fabrice Cognasse; Marc Vocanson; Yves Bertrand; Philippe Connes Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-12-22