Literature DB >> 33223248

Improving urban household solid waste management in developing countries based on the German experience.

Bruno Duarte Azevedo1, Luiz Felipe Scavarda2, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado3, Maryegli Fuss4.   

Abstract

Countries worldwide strive to improve their urban household solid waste management (UHSWM) practices. While developed countries like Germany have achieved good results with different UHSWM initiatives, developing countries still struggle to be effective with their waste management (WM) policies. With an interest in learning from the German experience, this paper provides a cross-case analysis between a German and a Brazilian city that can be of practical relevance to improving UHSWM in developing countries. The paper uses "process flow diagram" (PFD) and "wasteaware benchmark indicators" for integrated sustainable waste management (ISWM). Both methods confirmed the German city as a benchmark and attested the inefficiency of the Brazilian UHSWM. The total maximum score weightage percentage of the matrix quantification difference was significant, 98% against 50%. Findings highlight viable solutions based on the three pillars of the German solid WM system: clear laws, regular public campaigns, and fee methodology. The formalization and improvement of Brazilian UHSWM require better governance to obtain additional investments. Herein, the application of the Green Dot methodology, sponsored by industry and consumers in Germany, would enable an increase of up to 318% of the values received by a typical Brazilian cooperative. This additional investment can empower a sustainable solution where the population could opt to work with recycling, either as a formal employee or as a formal entrepreneur, shedding more light on the social pillar of the triple bottom line. Moreover, it can enable improvements in technologies, and on regular public campaigns to increase education in important sustainable matters.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Integrated sustainable waste management; Process flow diagrams; Sustainable supply chain management; Triple bottom line; Wasteaware benchmark indicators

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33223248     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of municipal solid waste management system in Lae City, Papua New Guinea in the context of sustainable development.

Authors:  Willie Doaemo; Sahil Dhiman; Alexander Borovskis; Wenlan Zhang; Sumedha Bhat; Srishti Jaipuria; Mirzi Betasolo
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.219

2.  Approach to assess the performance of waste management systems towards a circular economy: waste management system development stage concept (WMS-DSC).

Authors:  Alessio Campitelli; Jan Kannengießer; Liselotte Schebek
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Understanding barriers and motivations in solid waste management from Malaysian industries: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Mansoor Ahmed Soomro; Mohd Helmi Ali; Suhaiza Zailani; Ming-Lang Tseng; Zafir Mohd Makhbul
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Lessons and challenges for the recycling sector of Brazil from the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ronei de Almeida; Roberta Guimarães de Souza; Juacyara Carbonelli Campos
Journal:  Waste Dispos Sustain Energy       Date:  2021-06-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.