Literature DB >> 33222325

Increasing comparability among coral bleaching experiments.

A G Grottoli1, R J Toonen2, R van Woesik3, R Vega Thurber4, M E Warner5, R H McLachlan1, J T Price1, K D Bahr6, I B Baums7, K D Castillo8, M A Coffroth9, R Cunning10, K L Dobson1, M J Donahue2, J L Hench11, R Iglesias-Prieto7, D W Kemp12, C D Kenkel13, D I Kline14, I B Kuffner15, J L Matthews16, A B Mayfield17,18, J L Padilla-Gamiño19, S Palumbi20, C R Voolstra21, V M Weis22, H C Wu23.   

Abstract

Coral bleaching is the single largest global threat to coral reefs worldwide. Integrating the diverse body of work on coral bleaching is critical to understanding and combating this global problem. Yet investigating the drivers, patterns, and processes of coral bleaching poses a major challenge. A recent review of published experiments revealed a wide range of experimental variables used across studies. Such a wide range of approaches enhances discovery, but without full transparency in the experimental and analytical methods used, can also make comparisons among studies challenging. To increase comparability but not stifle innovation, we propose a common framework for coral bleaching experiments that includes consideration of coral provenance, experimental conditions, and husbandry. For example, reporting the number of genets used, collection site conditions, the experimental temperature offset(s) from the maximum monthly mean (MMM) of the collection site, experimental light conditions, flow, and the feeding regime will greatly facilitate comparability across studies. Similarly, quantifying common response variables of endosymbiont (Symbiodiniaceae) and holobiont phenotypes (i.e., color, chlorophyll, endosymbiont cell density, mortality, and skeletal growth) could further facilitate cross-study comparisons. While no single bleaching experiment can provide the data necessary to determine global coral responses of all corals to current and future ocean warming, linking studies through a common framework as outlined here, would help increase comparability among experiments, facilitate synthetic insights into the causes and underlying mechanisms of coral bleaching, and reveal unique bleaching responses among genets, species, and regions. Such a collaborative framework that fosters transparency in methods used would strengthen comparisons among studies that can help inform coral reef management and facilitate conservation strategies to mitigate coral bleaching worldwide.
© 2021 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  common framework; coral bleaching; coral heat stress; cross-study comparisons; experimental design methods; feeding; flow; light; phenotype; standardization; temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33222325     DOI: 10.1002/eap.2262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  15 in total

1.  Census of heat tolerance among Florida's threatened staghorn corals finds resilient individuals throughout existing nursery populations.

Authors:  Ross Cunning; Katherine E Parker; Kelsey Johnson-Sapp; Richard F Karp; Alexandra D Wen; Olivia M Williamson; Erich Bartels; Martine D'Alessandro; David S Gilliam; Grace Hanson; Jessica Levy; Diego Lirman; Kerry Maxwell; Wyatt C Million; Alison L Moulding; Amelia Moura; Erinn M Muller; Ken Nedimyer; Brian Reckenbeil; Ruben van Hooidonk; Craig Dahlgren; Carly Kenkel; John E Parkinson; Andrew C Baker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Individual variation in growth and physiology of symbionts in response to temperature.

Authors:  Casey P terHorst; Mary Alice Coffroth
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Nitric oxide production rather than oxidative stress and cell death is associated with the onset of coral bleaching in Pocillopora acuta.

Authors:  Christopher P Jury; Brian M Boeing; Henry Trapido-Rosenthal; Ruth D Gates; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Differential susceptibility of reef-building corals to deoxygenation reveals remarkable hypoxia tolerance.

Authors:  Maggie D Johnson; Sara D Swaminathan; Emily N Nixon; Valerie J Paul; Andrew H Altieri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Implications of bleaching on cnidarian venom ecology.

Authors:  K L Kaposi; R L Courtney; J E Seymour
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 6.  Effects of sediment exposure on corals: a systematic review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Lillian J Tuttle; Megan J Donahue
Journal:  Environ Evid       Date:  2022-02-07

7.  Effects of elevated temperature on reproduction and larval settlement in Leptastrea purpurea.

Authors:  Nikko Galanto; Constance Sartor; Victoria Moscato; Mykel Lizama; Sarah Lemer
Journal:  Coral Reefs       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 4.640

8.  Scaling up calcification, respiration, and photosynthesis rates of six prominent coral taxa.

Authors:  Jeremy Carlot; Héloïse Rouzé; Diego R Barneche; Alexandre Mercière; Benoit Espiau; Ulisse Cardini; Simon J Brandl; Jordan M Casey; Gonzalo Pérez-Rosales; Mehdi Adjeroud; Laetitia Hédouin; Valeriano Parravicini
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Coral micro-fragmentation assays for optimizing active reef restoration efforts.

Authors:  Ingrid S S Knapp; Zac H Forsman; Austin Greene; Erika C Johnston; Claire E Bardin; Norton Chan; Chelsea Wolke; David Gulko; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.061

10.  Physiological acclimatization in Hawaiian corals following a 22-month shift in baseline seawater temperature and pH.

Authors:  Rowan H McLachlan; James T Price; Agustí Muñoz-Garcia; Noah L Weisleder; Stephen J Levas; Christopher P Jury; Robert J Toonen; Andréa G Grottoli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.