Literature DB >> 33222025

In-season weather data provide reliable yield estimates of maize and soybean in the US central Corn Belt.

Vijaya R Joshi1,2,3, Maciej J Kazula1, Jeffrey A Coulter1, Seth L Naeve1, Axel Garcia Y Garcia4,5.   

Abstract

Weather conditions regulate the growth and yield of crops, especially in rain-fed agricultural systems. This study evaluated the use and relative importance of readily available weather data to develop yield estimation models for maize and soybean in the US central Corn Belt. Total rainfall (Rain), average air temperature (Tavg), and the difference between maximum and minimum air temperature (Tdiff) at weekly, biweekly, and monthly timescales from May to August were used to estimate county-level maize and soybean grain yields for Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, and Minnesota. Step-wise multiple linear regression (MLR), general additive (GAM), and support vector machine (SVM) models were trained with Rain, Tavg, and with/without Tdiff. For the total study area and at individual state level, SVM outperformed other models at all temporal levels for both maize and soybean. For maize, Tavg and Tdiff during July and August, and Rain during June and July, were relatively more important whereas for soybean, Tavg in June and Tdiff and Rain during August were more important. The SVM model with weekly Rain and Tavg estimated the overall maize yield with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 591 kg ha-1 (4.9% nRMSE) and soybean yield with a RMSE of 205 kg ha-1 (5.5% nRMSE). Inclusion of Tdiff in the model considerably improved yield estimation for both crops; however, the magnitude of improvement varied with the model and temporal level of weather data. This study shows the relative importance of weather variables and reliable yield estimation of maize and soybean from readily available weather data to develop a decision support tool in the US central Corn Belt.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crop modeling; Statistical modeling; Weather index; Yield forecasting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33222025      PMCID: PMC7985103          DOI: 10.1007/s00484-020-02039-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  11 in total

1.  An overview of statistical learning theory.

Authors:  V N Vapnik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1999

2.  Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change.

Authors:  Wolfram Schlenker; Michael J Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effect of warming temperatures on US wheat yields.

Authors:  Jesse Tack; Andrew Barkley; Lawton Lanier Nalley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the U.S. Midwest.

Authors:  David B Lobell; Michael J Roberts; Wolfram Schlenker; Noah Braun; Bertis B Little; Roderick M Rejesus; Graeme L Hammer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Climate-induced reduction in US-wide soybean yields underpinned by region- and in-season-specific responses.

Authors:  Spyridon Mourtzinis; James E Specht; Laura E Lindsey; William J Wiebold; Jeremy Ross; Emerson D Nafziger; Herman J Kandel; Nathan Mueller; Philip L Devillez; Francisco J Arriaga; Shawn P Conley
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Relationship between rice yield and climate variables in southwest Nigeria using multiple linear regression and support vector machine analysis.

Authors:  Philip G Oguntunde; Gunnar Lischeid; Ottfried Dietrich
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; James S Gerber; Graham K MacDonald; Paul C West
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Meteorological fluctuations define long-term crop yield patterns in conventional and organic production systems.

Authors:  John R Teasdale; Michel A Cavigelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions.

Authors:  Jig Han Jeong; Jonathan P Resop; Nathaniel D Mueller; David H Fleisher; Kyungdahm Yun; Ethan E Butler; Dennis J Timlin; Kyo-Moon Shim; James S Gerber; Vangimalla R Reddy; Soo-Hyung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Role of Climate Covariability on Crop Yields in the Conterminous United States.

Authors:  Guoyong Leng; Xuesong Zhang; Maoyi Huang; Ghassem R Asrar; L Ruby Leung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.