Literature DB >> 33221921

Advanced imaging for quantification of abnormalities in the salivary glands of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Pilar Jimenez-Royo1, Michele Bombardieri2, Coziana Ciurtin3, Michalis Kostapanos4,5, Anwar R Tappuni6, Natasha Jordan7, Azeem Saleem8,9, Teresa Fuller1, Kathleen Port1, Elena Pontarini2, Davide Lucchesi2, Robert Janiczek1, Paul Galette1, Graham Searle8, Neel Patel1, Lucy Kershaw10,11, Calum Gray11, Nirav Ratia1, André van Maurik1, Marius de Groot1,4, Nicolas Wisniacki1, Mats Bergstrom1, Ruth Tarzi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess non-invasive imaging for detection and quantification of gland structure, inflammation and function in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) using PET-CT with 11C-Methionine (11C-MET; radiolabelled amino acid), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG; glucose uptake marker), to assess protein synthesis and inflammation, respectively; multiparametric MRI evaluated salivary gland structural and physiological changes.
METHODS: In this imaging/clinical/histology comparative study (GSK study 203818; NCT02899377) patients with pSS and age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the salivary glands and 11C-MET PET-CT. Patients also underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT and labial salivary gland biopsies. Clinical and biomarker assessments were performed. Primary endpoints were semi-quantitative parameters of 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake in submandibular and parotid salivary glands and quantitative MRI measures of structure and inflammation. Clinical and minor salivary gland histological parameter correlations were explored.
RESULTS: Twelve patients with pSS and 13 healthy volunteers were included. Lower 11C-MET uptake in parotid, submandibular and lacrimal glands, lower submandibular gland volume, higher MRI fat fraction, and lower pure diffusion in parotid and submandibular glands were observed in patients vs healthy volunteer, consistent with reduced synthetic function. Disease duration correlated positively with fat fraction and negatively with 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake, consistent with impaired function, inflammation and fatty replacement over time. Lacrimal gland 11C-MET uptake positively correlated with tear flow in patients, and parotid gland 18F-FDG uptake positively correlated with salivary gland CD20+ B-cell infiltration.
CONCLUSION: Molecular imaging and MRI may be useful tools to non-invasively assess loss of glandular function, increased glandular inflammation and fat accumulation in pSS.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scanning; MRI; SS; diagnostic imaging; outcome measures and histopathology; radionuclide imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33221921      PMCID: PMC8121449          DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


We examined 11C-Methionine, 18F-FDG PET-CT and multi-parametric MRI for quantitative pSS salivary gland imaging. Patients with pSS had structural/functional differences in salivary and lacrimal glands versus healthy volunteers. Molecular imaging parameters correlated with disease characteristics, providing initial validation for quantitative assessment of pSS.

Introduction

Primary SS (pSS) is a systemic auto-inflammatory rheumatic disease with unknown etiopathogenesis in which the autoimmune reaction targets the salivary and lacrimal glands. Dry mouth (xerostomia) and dry eyes (keratoconjunctivitis sicca) are two of the main symptoms of pSS [1, 2], although multiple organs and mucosal surfaces may be affected [3, 4]. There is currently no disease-modifying drug for pSS, and the disease has a significant detrimental impact on quality of life [5]. Early pSS diagnosis and assessment of disease activity are hampered by non-specific clinical manifestations, subjective symptoms and a lack of specific or quantitative biomarkers. Moreover, standard diagnostic and disease monitoring techniques [6, 7] have drawbacks, including sampling errors from biopsies, and variability in salivary and tear flow assays. Although salivary gland ultrasound has been explored as a potential surrogate for salivary gland biopsies [8], the absence of a validated scoring system and inherent inter-observer variability restrict its use as a reliable tool. Non-invasive molecular imaging methods that can quantify function could be attractive tools for assessing disease status and potentially monitoring treatment effects. This study assessed the potential of three functional imaging methods for the quantification of salivary gland structure, inflammation and function in patients with pSS. First, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with 11C-methionine (11C-MET) was used as a protein synthesis marker. As 11C-MET is prominently incorporated into cellular proteins [9, 10], it can assess residual salivary gland function. Second, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET-CT, which indicates metabolic tissue activity in tumours [11, 12] and inflammation due to the higher expression of glucose transporters and glycolytic index in inflammatory cells [4, 13–16], was used to assess glucose utilization. The ability to evaluate systemic manifestations of pSS using 18F-FDG was also examined [15]. Finally, multi-parametric MRI was conducted to assess gland inflammation, structure and function [17]. This is the first time 11C-MET has been used to characterize salivary gland inflammation and residual function in pSS.

Methods

Study design

The study (GSK study 203818; NCT02899377) duration was ≤14 weeks for patients with pSS, and ≤11 weeks for healthy volunteers (HVs). Study design (Supplementary Fig. S1, available at Rheumatology online) details are summarized in the Supplementary Methods, available at Rheumatology online.

Endpoints

The primary endpoints were semi-quantitative parameters of 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake in submandibular and parotid salivary glands [standardized uptake value (SUV), tissue to reference ratio (T/R; an additional measure that provides a semi-quantitative description of tracer kinetics), total inflammatory volume and quantitative parameters of inflammation and tissue microstructure derived from multi-parametric MRI in the salivary glands [exchange rate (Ktrans), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D) and microvascular volume fraction (f)] (see Image acquisition and analysis and Supplementary Materials, available at Rheumatology online). Exploratory endpoints included 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake in lacrimal glands and association with markers of disease activity and lacrimal gland function, and further quantitative parameters of inflammation, function and structure derived from multi-parametric MRI of the salivary glands [Initial Rate of Enhancement, maximum enhancement, fat fraction (%), pseudo-diffusion (D*) and gland volume]. All secondary and exploratory endpoints are summarized in the Supplementary Materials, available at Rheumatology online.

Ethical considerations

The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Good Clinical Practice, applicable country-specific requirements and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the East of England – Cambridge East National Research Ethics Committee (REC No.; 16/EE/0296) and by the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (ARSAC), UK (Research Certificate No.: RPC 630/3925/35065). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Patient and public involvement

The informed consent form and study feasibility were reviewed by a group of patients before submission for ethical review.

Study population

Eligible patients were ≥30 years, diagnosed with pSS according to the American-European Consensus Group criteria [18], with evidence of glandular reserve function (baseline unstimulated salivary flow of >0.0 ml/min or stimulated baseline salivary flow >0.05 mL/min). Patients also had systemically active disease defined by a EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI) score of ≥5 points. Patients diagnosed with secondary SS or another systemic autoimmune disease, or who had a history of malignancy ≤5 years before screening or unresolved acute or chronic infection were excluded. HV were mean-age- and sex-matched to patients (≥40 years for 11C-MET PET-CT plus MRI and ≥30 years for MRI without 11C-MET PET-CT). Full inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in the Supplementary Materials, available at Rheumatology online.

Image acquisition and analysis

At Visit 1, patients and HV underwent an MRI of the salivary glands and 11C-MET PET-CT (dynamic scan of the salivary glands followed by head-to-hip static scan); patients also underwent static 18F-FDG PET-CT (head-to-hip). 11C-MET PET-CT scans were acquired ∼30 min after a standardized light meal to stimulate salivary flow. 18F-FDG PET-CT scans were acquired after ≥6 h of fasting and 60 min after 18F-FDG administration. SUVs (SUVmax and SUVpeak) and volumes were automatically extracted for each region of interest following region of interest contouring. The parotid, submandibular and lacrimal glands were analysed using 11C-MET and 18F-FDG scans, as were the spleen, liver, thyroid and pancreas. Aorta blood pool was used as the reference region for T/R calculations. Total inflammatory volume was not calculated as there were no anatomically relevant areas indicative of inflamed tissue and/or focal uptake within the organs. Multi-parametric MRI of the salivary glands included a T1w high resolution structural image, Dixon imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, quantitative T1 mapping and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI, which took place following administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Anatomical region of interests were defined on structural MRI for parotid and submandibular glands. Diffusion-weighted MRI imaging data were used to fit a multi-parametric intravoxel incoherent motion model [19], as well as a conventional diffusion model to estimate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Full details of image acquisition and analysis are in the Supplementary Materials, available at Rheumatology online.

Clinical and histological evaluations

Clinical and biomarker assessments for patients and HV were performed at screening/baseline and Visit 2.

Tear flow and salivary flow measurements

Lacrimal flow was measured using the Schirmer’s test (unanaesthetized) and quantified as mean length wet per min (mm/min) over the two visits for each eye. Mean basal and stimulated (by paraffin chew) salivary flow were measured following standard procedures. Full details are given in the Supplementary Materials, available at Rheumatology online.

Salivary gland biopsy

Minor (labial) salivary gland biopsy was performed for patients at Visit 2. Salivary gland histological assessments included evaluation of focus score histological index (the number of mononuclear cell infiltrates containing ≥50 cells in a 4-mm2 glandular tissue) [20] assessed on haematoxylin and eosin staining; and the detection of the immune infiltrate markers by immunofluorescence (CD20+ B cells, IgG+, IgA+, and IgM+ plasma cells [PC]). Slides from two cutting levels (100 μm distance apart) were imaged using a NanoZoomer S60 digital slide scanner and NanoZoomer digital pathology viewer software version 2.6.13 (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan). Immunofluorescence staining of CD3, CD20 and immunoglobulins was quantified using Fiji software [21] and the area fraction of each marker was expressed as the ratio of the stained area over the total area of salivary gland tissue. Full details are given in the Supplementary Materials, including Supplementary Table S1, available at Rheumatology online.

Safety evaluations

Adverse events (AEs), pregnancies, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests were monitored throughout the study.

Statistical analysis

Information on sample size is in the Supplementary Materials, available at Rheumatology online. An exploratory comparison of patients vs HV was performed for each 11C-MET PET-CT and multi-parametric MRI derived quantitative parameter (data permitting), to estimate a difference (ratio where normality assumptions are not adequate) with 95% CI. Where 95% CI for difference were clearly above or below zero, this was described as higher/lower than the reference value. Pearson correlation (R) coefficient analyses were performed to assess the relationship between different imaging parameters and between imaging and clinical/histological parameters, as pre-specified in the reporting analysis plan. Correlations were defined as strong (R ≥ 0.8); moderate (R ≥ 0.5); or low (R ≥ 0.2). The study was not statistically powered to detect significant difference for any parameters.

Results

Participant disposition and baseline characteristics

Twenty-five participants were included; 12 patients and 13 HV (Supplementary Fig. S2, available at Rheumatology online). Twelve HV completed MRI, of whom eight underwent 11C-MET PET-CT. One HV was withdrawn due to intolerance of the MRI (see Safety section). Patients and HV were well matched for age, sex and body weight; demographics are listed in Table 1.
1

Demographics, baseline characteristics and disease characteristics of healthy volunteers and patients with pSS

DemographicsHealthy volunteers (n = 13)Healthy volunteers who underwent 11C-MET PET-CT scan (n = 8)Patients with pSS (n = 12)Overall (n = 25)
Age, mean (s.d.), yearsa48.1 (13.87)51.5 (13.29)49.0 (13.70)48.5 (13.51)
Sex, n (%)
 Female13 (100)8 (100)12 (100)25 (100)
BMI, mean (range), kg/m225.59 (20.7–34.1)25.80 (20.7–34.1)27.07 (20.0–39.4)26.30 (20.0–39.4)
Height, mean (range), cm167.5 (159–182)168.4 (159–182)162.8 (152–174)165.2 (152–182)
Weight, mean (range), kg72.33 (53.7–113.0)73.99 (53.7–113.0)71.53 (51.4–91.0)71.95 (51.4–113.0)
Ethnicity, n (%)
 Not Hispanic or Latino13 (100)8 (100)12 (100)25 (100)
Race, n (%)
 Black or African-American2 (15)1 (13)02 (8)
 Asian—Central/South Asian Heritage003 (25)3 (12)
 Asian—South-East Asian Heritage001 (8)1 (4)
 White—White/Caucasian/European Heritage10 (77)7 (88)5 (42)15 (60)
 Unknown1 (8)03 (25)4 (16)
Disease characteristics, mean (range)
 Disease duration, years5.8 (0.25–38.7)
 ESSDAI final scoreb8.6 (6–16)
 ESSPRI final scorec6.361 (4.33–8.33)
Salivary flow rated, ml/min
 Basal unstimulated0.353 (0.20–0.62)0.193 (0.01–0.60)
 Stimulated1.958 (0.91–3.41)0.728 (0.05–1.97)
 Differencee1.605 (0.63–3.21)0.535 (0.04–1.37)
Strip length per minutef, mm/min
 Right eye5.46 (0.80–23.60)1.72 (0–7.00)
 Left eye4.89 (0.20–11.29)1.67 (0–7.00)
Complement, g/l
 Component 31.103 (0.77–1.62)
 Component 4 (n=11)0.245 (0.07–0.39)
IgG, g/l17.657 (6.70–26.73)

Age imputed for missing date of birth.

ESSDAI Final Score is the sum of 12 activity-level domain scores.

ESSPRI Final Score is an average of pain, fatigue and dryness scales scores.

Mean salivary flow rate calculated using screening and Visit 2 mean salivary flow.

Difference is calculated by subtracting basal salivary flow rate from stimulated flow rate.

Strip length wet per min (mm/min) calculated as length (mm) paper wet divided by time taken to wet (min).

11C-MET: 11C-Methionine; ESSDAI: EULAR Sjögren’sn Syndrome Disease Activity Index; ESSPRI: EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index; pSS: primary SS.

Demographics, baseline characteristics and disease characteristics of healthy volunteers and patients with pSS Age imputed for missing date of birth. ESSDAI Final Score is the sum of 12 activity-level domain scores. ESSPRI Final Score is an average of pain, fatigue and dryness scales scores. Mean salivary flow rate calculated using screening and Visit 2 mean salivary flow. Difference is calculated by subtracting basal salivary flow rate from stimulated flow rate. Strip length wet per min (mm/min) calculated as length (mm) paper wet divided by time taken to wet (min). 11C-MET: 11C-Methionine; ESSDAI: EULAR Sjögren’sn Syndrome Disease Activity Index; ESSPRI: EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index; pSS: primary SS.

Imaging methods reveal structural and metabolic differences between patients with pSS and HV

There was substantially lower 11C-MET SUVpeak uptake in the parotid and submandibular glands of patients compared with HV, while a similar trend towards lower uptake was observed for the lacrimal glands, indicating reduced protein synthesis (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S3A and B and Supplementary Video S1, available at Rheumatology online). T/R data were consistent with 11C-MET SUVpeak findings (Supplementary Table S2, available at Rheumatology online). Higher 11C-MET SUVpeak uptake was seen in the thyroid and liver of patients vs HV, with trends towards higher uptake also seen in the spleen and lumbar vertebrae (Fig. 1C), suggesting increased metabolic activity in these organs, although this requires further confirmation.
. 1

11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake between patients with pSS and HVs

(A) 11C-MET SUVpeak in parotid, submandibular and lacrimal glands (pSS and HV) and 18F-FDG SUVmax in parotid glands (pSS)a; (B) dynamic imaging (summations of the final 10 minutes, approx. 30–40 minutes post injection) of 11C-MET uptake in parotid, submandibular and lacrimal glands for HVs (top) and patients with pSS (bottom). (C) Point estimate (95% CI) of mean SUVpeak difference (pSS-HV) for 11C-METb. aAggregated includes left and right salivary gland parameters. Difference is difference between means. bFor 11C-MET SUVmax data, see Supplementary Fig. S7, available at Rheumatology online. cGrey horizontal line indicates historical max SUV (mean [solid line]; +2SD [dotted line]) Basu S, Houseni M, Alavi A. Significance of incidental fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the parotid glands and its impact on patient management. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:367–73. 11C-MET: 11C-Methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; Max: maximum; pSS: primary SS; SUV: standardized uptake value.

11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake between patients with pSS and HVs (A) 11C-MET SUVpeak in parotid, submandibular and lacrimal glands (pSS and HV) and 18F-FDG SUVmax in parotid glands (pSS)a; (B) dynamic imaging (summations of the final 10 minutes, approx. 30–40 minutes post injection) of 11C-MET uptake in parotid, submandibular and lacrimal glands for HVs (top) and patients with pSS (bottom). (C) Point estimate (95% CI) of mean SUVpeak difference (pSS-HV) for 11C-METb. aAggregated includes left and right salivary gland parameters. Difference is difference between means. bFor 11C-MET SUVmax data, see Supplementary Fig. S7, available at Rheumatology online. cGrey horizontal line indicates historical max SUV (mean [solid line]; +2SD [dotted line]) Basu S, Houseni M, Alavi A. Significance of incidental fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the parotid glands and its impact on patient management. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:367–73. 11C-MET: 11C-Methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; Max: maximum; pSS: primary SS; SUV: standardized uptake value. 18F-FDG SUVmax was numerically higher in the parotid glands of patients compared with historical HV, indicating higher glycolytic activity in the salivary glands of patients (Fig. 1A) [15, 22]. Historical data for submandibular 18F-FDG uptake were not available. 18F-FDG SUVpeak values for parotid and submandibular glands are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3C and D, available at Rheumatology online. Uptake of 18F-FDG outside of salivary glands in patients with pSS was reviewed; however, no clinically important findings were reported following radiologist review. 18F-FDG uptake in different regions of interest is shown in Supplementary Table S3, available at Rheumatology online. A substantially lower submandibular gland, but not parotid gland, volume compared with HVs (Fig. 2) was observed on MR volumetric assessment. Furthermore, median (IQR) MRI fat fraction was higher in both the parotid and submandibular glands of patients [36.4 (26.6, 52.1) and 21.8 (12.7, 35.1), respectively] relative to HV [28.8 (20.4, 32.4) and 10.6 (9.9, 12.5), respectively], possibly reflecting some fat replacement of functional gland tissue in patients with pSS (Fig. 2). Patients also demonstrated greater variability around the point estimate of the fat fraction, compared with HV. Substantially lower pure diffusion was also observed in the parotid [mean (s.d.): 0.676 (0.1515)] and submandibular glands [0.807 (0.3001)] of patients compared with HV [0.787 (0.0950) and 0.993 (0.1415), respectively] (Fig. 2), possibly reflecting higher cell density. Additional MRI parameters are presented in Supplementary Fig. S4, available at Rheumatology online.
. 2

Differences in multi-parametric MRI measures between patients with pSS and HV

Point estimate (95% CI) of the geometric mean ratio (pSS/HV)a gland volume (cm3), fat fraction mean (%) and pure diffusion median (10−3mm2/s) in the parotid and submandibular glands from the multi-parametric MRI scan. Ratios are derived from the back-transformed estimate of the difference (pSS − HV) between log transformed means, and 95% CI are derived from the back-transformed estimate of the log 95% CI. CI is calculated using the Satterthwaite approximation. HV: healthy volunteer; pSS: primary SS.

Differences in multi-parametric MRI measures between patients with pSS and HV Point estimate (95% CI) of the geometric mean ratio (pSS/HV)a gland volume (cm3), fat fraction mean (%) and pure diffusion median (10−3mm2/s) in the parotid and submandibular glands from the multi-parametric MRI scan. Ratios are derived from the back-transformed estimate of the difference (pSS − HV) between log transformed means, and 95% CI are derived from the back-transformed estimate of the log 95% CI. CI is calculated using the Satterthwaite approximation. HV: healthy volunteer; pSS: primary SS. Findings in the parotid glands of patients and HV from either PET-CT or MRI were symmetrical when comparing left/right (Supplementary Fig. S5, available at Rheumatology online). In HV, 11C-MET SUVpeak uptake was similar between parotid and submandibular glands. However, in patients, 11C-MET SUVpeak uptake was lower in submandibular compared with parotid glands, suggesting that protein synthesis in the submandibular glands was disproportionately affected in this group of pSS patients. However, 18F-FDG SUVpeak uptake was similar in the submandibular and parotid glands of patients.

Correlations between imaging methods

11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak uptake were positively correlated in the parotid and submandibular glands of patients (Fig. 3). 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak displayed inverse strong and moderate correlations, respectively, with fat fraction in both submandibular and parotid glands of patients; again, this correlation was strongest in the submandibular glands (Fig. 3). 11C-MET displayed weakly negative correlations with fat fraction in the parotid and submandibular glands of HV (Fig. 3).
. 3

Correlations between 11C-MET, 18F-FDG and MRI fat fraction imaging parameters

11C-MET: 11C-methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; pSS, primary SS; R, Pearson’s correlation; SUV: standardized uptake value

Correlations between 11C-MET, 18F-FDG and MRI fat fraction imaging parameters 11C-MET: 11C-methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; pSS, primary SS; R, Pearson’s correlation; SUV: standardized uptake value

Correlations between imaging data and disease characteristics and histological measures

Imaging vs disease characteristics

In keeping with loss of salivary gland function over time in patients with pSS, 11C-MET uptake was strongly negatively correlated with disease duration. Similarly, there was moderate negative correlation of 18F-FDG uptake with time (Fig. 4A). In agreement with the PET findings, MRI fat fraction was moderately positively correlated with disease duration (Fig. 4A), while a strong negative correlation was observed for MRI pure diffusion median vs disease duration [0.808 (0.948, 0.403)].
. 4

Correlations between 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake and MRI fat fraction with disease characteristics

11C-MET and 18F-FDG peak SUV and MRI fat fraction correlations with (A) disease duration (years) and (B) stimulated salivary flow rate and (C) correlation of tear flow with 11C-MET PET-CT peak SUV in the lacrimal gland. Data were available for 10 patients only. 11C-MET: 11C-methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; pSS: primary SS; R, Pearson’s correlation; SUV: standardized uptake value.

Correlations between 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake and MRI fat fraction with disease characteristics 11C-MET and 18F-FDG peak SUV and MRI fat fraction correlations with (A) disease duration (years) and (B) stimulated salivary flow rate and (C) correlation of tear flow with 11C-MET PET-CT peak SUV in the lacrimal gland. Data were available for 10 patients only. 11C-MET: 11C-methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; pSS: primary SS; R, Pearson’s correlation; SUV: standardized uptake value. Salivary flow was uniformly low in patients, and 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak demonstrated only a weak positive correlation, or no correlation, with mean stimulated salivary flow rate in the parotid glands of patients (Fig. 4B). In contrast, lacrimal gland 11C-MET SUVpeak positively correlated (strongly and moderately) with tear flow rates in patients; however, none or weak correlations were observed for HV (Fig. 4C). Further correlation data can be found in Supplementary Table S4, available at Rheumatology online.

Imaging vs histological measures

Surprisingly, histological focus scores from minor salivary gland biopsy demonstrated no clear correlation with either 11C-MET or 18F-FDG SUVpeak in patients (Fig. 5A). A moderate positive correlation was observed between 18F-FDG SUVpeak in the parotid gland and CD20+ B-cell infiltration (or area fraction) in the minor salivary gland of patients, suggesting that increased FDG activity is reflective of a B-cell tissue infiltrate. However, there was no such correlation between 11C-MET SUVpeak and CD20 (Fig. 5B), suggesting that methionine activity is not confounded by inflammation.
. 5

Correlations between 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake with histological markers

(A) 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak in parotid gland correlations with focus score; representative histological image of minor salivary gland lobule stained for haematoloxylin and eosin (H&E) for focus score assessment. Highlighted section identifies an inflammatory focus, defined as an aggregate of at least 50 inflammatory mononuclear cells. (B) 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak in parotid gland correlated with CD20; representative immunofluorescence staining for CD20 identifying B cells within inflammatory aggregates in pSS. (C) 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak in parotid gland correlated with IgG in minor salivary gland; representative immunofluorescence staining for IgA, IgG and IgM, expressed by plasma cells in pSS. 11C-MET: 11C-methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; pSS, primary SS; R, Pearson’s correlation; SUV: standardized uptake value.

Correlations between 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake with histological markers (A) 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak in parotid gland correlations with focus score; representative histological image of minor salivary gland lobule stained for haematoloxylin and eosin (H&E) for focus score assessment. Highlighted section identifies an inflammatory focus, defined as an aggregate of at least 50 inflammatory mononuclear cells. (B) 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak in parotid gland correlated with CD20; representative immunofluorescence staining for CD20 identifying B cells within inflammatory aggregates in pSS. (C) 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak in parotid gland correlated with IgG in minor salivary gland; representative immunofluorescence staining for IgA, IgG and IgM, expressed by plasma cells in pSS. 11C-MET: 11C-methionine; 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HV: healthy volunteer; pSS, primary SS; R, Pearson’s correlation; SUV: standardized uptake value. In the parotid gland of patients, moderate positive correlations were noted between IgG deposition in minor salivary gland biopsies, and both 11C-MET and 18F-FDG SUVpeak (Fig. 5C). Additionally, a moderate positive correlation was shown between minor salivary gland IgM and parotid gland 11C-MET SUVpeak [R (95% CI): 0.505 (0.097, 0.836)] and a moderate negative correlation was shown between minor salivary gland IgM and fat fraction [R (95% CI): 0.503 (0.860, 0.185)] in the parotid gland. Minor salivary gland IgA was also moderately positively correlated with 11C-MET SUVpeak [R (95% CI): 0.628 (0.085, 0.884)] in the parotid gland.

Safety

Overall, study procedures were well tolerated. Four patients and two HV reported AEs most commonly headache, reported in one patient and one HV (Supplementary Table S5, available at Rheumatology online). Most AEs were mild in intensity. One HV was withdrawn from the study because of hyperaesthesia and paraesthesia experienced during the MRI scan; these AEs were moderate in intensity and deemed unrelated to the study procedures. No deaths or serious AEs were reported.

Discussion

This is the first evaluation of the amino acid PET tracer 11C-MET in patients with pSS. Additionally, the application of MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT to quantify and characterize disease manifestations in pSS were evaluated in this imaging/histology comparative study. Lower 11C-MET uptake was observed in the submandibular and parotid glands of patients compared with HV, in addition to a trend towards lower uptake in the lacrimal glands, suggesting lower protein synthesis in patients than in HV. Although 11C-MET data alone do not distinguish whether such protein synthesis would be attributable to synthesis of saliva or inflammation, the lower uptake would be consistent with loss of glandular function [9, 10]. Together with the strong negative correlation between disease duration and 11C-MET uptake in the parotid gland, and the correlations between 11C-MET uptake and lacrimal tear flow, our findings suggest that reduced 11C-MET uptake is a marker of residual gland function. Notable confounding factors may be the tendency for older participants to have longer disease duration and the known minor decline in salivary gland function with age, even in healthy individuals [23], although patients were age-matched to HV. Surprisingly, 11C-MET uptake did not correlate with salivary flow rates, possibly due to the impact of factors other than gland function on salivary flow (e.g. diurnal variation in flow rates, patients’ hydration status at time of collection, pH and viscosity of saliva, dental plaque status, tongue pressure and coating status). One possibility is that gland inflammation itself can reduce salivary gland function, independent of loss of protein synthetic activity. However, salivary flow rate data for patients with pSS were skewed towards low values, thus affecting quantitation accuracy as the correlation estimations assume normal distribution; therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Parotid gland 18F-FDG uptake tended to be higher in patients with pSS compared with previously published control data [22, 24]; and there was a moderate negative correlation with disease duration, whilst a positive correlation was observed with 11C-MET uptake. It is worth noting that patients with pSS were at different disease stages and overall displayed high 18F-FDG uptake and lower 11C-MET uptake compared with HV, consistent with greater salivary gland inflammation and loss of functional reserve. The positive correlation between 18F-FDG and 11C-MET in patients with pSS can be explained by considering overall disease course, in which it is expected that both 18F-FDG and 11C-MET uptake declines from high to normal (18F-FDG) and normal to low (11C-MET) as the disease progresses, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S6, available at Rheumatology online), as is supported by the study data (Fig. 4A). Overall, we hypothesize that inflammation occurs early in the disease course and is associated with relatively preserved underlying gland function, which transitions to a decline in both inflammation and gland function from early to late disease, thereby explaining the positive correlation between the 18F-FDG and 11C-MET imaging parameters. Alternatively, both tracers could be primarily affected by cellular integrity, rather than 18F-FDG being a measure of inflammation, and 11C-MET of function. Notably, leucocyte infiltration has not been reported to increase 11C-MET uptake to the same degree as 18F-FDG [25]. However, there were stronger correlations of 18F-FDG with markers of inflammation (CD20+ B-cell infiltration) and 11C-MET with accepted markers of function (tear flow), suggesting that they measure different aspects of disease. Parotid gland 18F-FDG uptake did not correlate with histological focus score on minor salivary gland biopsy. It is unclear why such a correlation could not be observed, as it has been demonstrated that minor salivary gland focus score correlates with inflammation in parotid glands in an ultrasound study [26]. Furthermore, moderate correlations were seen with CD20 infiltration and IgG deposition in minor salivary gland, supporting the hypothesis that 18F-FDG uptake may be a measure of inflammation; however, this may be due to sample size. Outside of the salivary glands, 11C-MET uptake was higher in the thyroid and liver of patients with pSS compared with HV, suggesting increased protein synthesis. Although no patients with pSS were reported to be clinically affected by thyroiditis, an association between thyroid disease, most frequently subclinical hypothyroidism, and pSS has been reported [27]; however, this was not supported by the physiological levels of 18F-FDG uptake in the thyroids of corresponding patients in our study. Overall, the small sample size prevents further conclusions being drawn. Variable 18F-FDG uptake was observed across multiple organs, but no findings were considered clinically abnormal. In contrast, a study by Cohen et al. [15] observed abnormal uptake in organs including lung, lymph nodes and thyroid. However, the patient subsets recruited included those with lung involvement and suspected lymphoma, whereas clinical suspicion of lymphoma was an exclusion criterion for this study. Furthermore, methods of analysis and definitions of positive uptake differed between the studies. The Dixon method, used to estimate fat fraction from structural MRI, has previously been used to successfully measure the characteristic fat deposition in the parotid glands of patients with pSS [28]. Diffusion-weighted imaging and entropy of parotid glands previously enabled discrimination between patients with active and non-active pSS [29]. In this study, evidence from MRI, including higher fat fraction and lower pure diffusion in the glands of patients compared with HV and correlation of both fat fraction and pure diffusion (positive and negative, respectively) with disease duration, is suggestive of fatty replacement of functional gland tissue, which has been shown to occur as glandular atrophy and disease progression occurs. Fat fraction was also negatively correlated with 11C-MET and 18F-FDG uptake. Together, these data support the use of MRI, particularly fat fraction and pure diffusion parameters, in the non-invasive characterization of pSS. These findings are consistent with a small study that demonstrated a correlation between MRI findings and disease stage in patients with secondary SS [30]. Overall, these results corroborate a hypothesis in which pSS may start with inflammatory reactions that are followed by deterioration of salivary and lacrimal gland function and a gradual atrophy that includes replacement of glandular cells with fat [31]. The observation of retained right–left symmetry, which is consistent with previous work [10], indicates that the disease is global and not sporadically attacking one specific gland. Intra-individual differences seen in imaging parameters of parotid and submandibular glands indicate that the disease manifestation may separately affect the parotid or submandibular glands to different degrees. Study limitations include the use of historical control data for the 18F-FDG analyses, which did not allow precise comparisons between patients and controls, and analysis of correlations between imaging vs function/clinical parameters in the parotid gland only (for technical reasons for DCE-MRI and to limit the number of comparisons conducted). However, with a few exceptions, the major findings between the parotid and submandibular glands were similar. Parotid imaging parameters only were correlated with overall salivary flow, although the disease generally does involve both parotid and submandibular glands. Finally, the imaging techniques used were not compared with ultrasound examination of the salivary glands. In conclusion, 11C-MET scans of the salivary and lacrimal glands in patients with pSS have the potential to quantitatively assess residual function in individual glands, while 18F-FDG is a potential method to assess salivary gland inflammation. These imaging modalities may facilitate non-invasive assessment of patients with pSS, particularly in early phase clinical trials. 11C-MET PET-CT, 18F-FDG PET-CT and MRI fat fraction could be used to define patients with inflammation (as measured by increased 18F-FDG uptake) along with relatively preserved residual salivary gland function (preserved 11C-MET uptake) as opposed to patients with severe dysfunction; the former ‘sub-group’ potentially being better candidates for drug therapy. Additionally, although not evaluated here, some of these parameters could be used in future interventional studies to assess the mechanistic effects of therapeutic interventions, complementing clinical scoring. Click here for additional data file.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group.

Authors:  C Vitali; S Bombardieri; R Jonsson; H M Moutsopoulos; E L Alexander; S E Carsons; T E Daniels; P C Fox; R I Fox; S S Kassan; S R Pillemer; N Talal; M H Weisman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Major Salivary Gland Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Sjögren's Syndrome: A Place in the Diagnostic Criteria?

Authors:  Malin V Jonsson; Chiara Baldini
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 3.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Sjögren's Syndrome.

Authors:  Ana-Luisa Stefanski; Christian Tomiak; Uwe Pleyer; Thomas Dietrich; Gerd Rüdiger Burmester; Thomas Dörner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Value of 11C-methionine PET in imaging brain tumours and metastases.

Authors:  Andor W J M Glaudemans; Roelien H Enting; Mart A A M Heesters; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Ronald W J van Rheenen; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Riemer H J A Slart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Normal FDG distribution patterns in the head and neck: PET/CT evaluation.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Dima Hammoud; Christian Cohade; Medhat M Osman; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Usefulness of MR imaging of the parotid glands in patients with secondary Sjögren's syndrome associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Masahiro Yokosawa; Hiroto Tsuboi; Katsuhiro Nasu; Chihiro Hagiya; Shinya Hagiwara; Tomoya Hirota; Hiroshi Ebe; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Hiromitsu Asashima; Yuya Kondo; Hiroshi Ogishima; Takeshi Suzuki; Manabu Minami; Hiroki Bukawa; Isao Matsumoto; Takayuki Sumida
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 8.  Thyroid disease in Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  Luis J Jara; Carmen Navarro; María del Pilar Brito-Zerón; Mario García-Carrasco; Ricardo O Escárcega; Manuel Ramos-Casals
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Differences in transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in inflammation, prostate cancer, and glioma cells: comparison with L-[methyl-11C]methionine and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose.

Authors:  Shuntaro Oka; Hiroyuki Okudaira; Masahiro Ono; David M Schuster; Mark M Goodman; Keiichi Kawai; Yoshifumi Shirakami
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Consensus and Data-Driven Methodology Involving Three International Patient Cohorts.

Authors:  Caroline H Shiboski; Stephen C Shiboski; Raphaèle Seror; Lindsey A Criswell; Marc Labetoulle; Thomas M Lietman; Astrid Rasmussen; Hal Scofield; Claudio Vitali; Simon J Bowman; Xavier Mariette
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 10.995

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Novel Technique for the Evaluation and Interpretation of Elastography in Salivary Gland Involvement in Primary Sjögren Syndrome.

Authors:  Rosa Elda Barbosa-Cobos; Rubén Torres-González; Ana Victoria Meza-Sánchez; Lucio Ventura-Ríos; Luz Elena Concha-Del-Río; Julián Ramírez-Bello; Everardo Álvarez-Hernández; Claudia Irene Meléndez-Mercado; Favio Edmundo Enríquez-Sosa; Cinthia Jahoska Samuria-Flores; Gustavo Esteban Lugo-Zamudio; Cristina Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 2.  Sjögren Syndrome: New Insights in the Pathogenesis and Role of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Anzola Luz Kelly; Rivera Jose Nelson; Ramírez Sara; Signore Alberto
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.