Literature DB >> 33221803

Analysis of YAG Laser-Induced Damage in Intraocular Lenses: Characterization of Optical and Surface Properties of YAG Shots.

Andreas F Borkenstein1, Eva-Maria Borkenstein2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess differences in neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG)-induced defects in hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and describe optical and surface properties of YAG shots/pitting. Describing and measuring the iatrogenic produced defects should achieve higher awareness on this topic and change the mindset of such a trivial procedure to be proceeded with more caution and calmness in the future. MATERIALS: Twelve IOLs from different manufacturers made of hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials were evaluated before and after treatment with the Nd:YAG laser. Microscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopic (ESEM) images were used to visually analyze the defects. Additionally, wavefront measurements were taken for power mapping and Raman spectroscopy was performed. Vertical and horizontal dimensions of the defects were analyzed and compared, and Raman line scans assessed the changes in the chemical structure in the defect area of the IOL.
RESULTS: Microscopically, pitting of the surface could be observed in both lens types. Defects in hydrophobic lenses appeared bigger and were visible with less magnification than in hydrophilic lenses. Similar results were obtained with ESEM images where the defects in hydrophobic IOLs seemed to be frayed while defects in hydrophilic IOLs were of circular shape. Raman spectroscopy revealed deeper defects in hydrophobic lenses. Vertical dimensions of the defects were statistically significant (p = 0.036) and greater in hydrophobic materials while horizontal dimensions did not reach significance (p = 0.056). The area of chemical changes was greater than the visible defect area and smaller in hydrophilic than that in hydrophobic materials.
CONCLUSION: Nd:YAG seems to have greater impact on hydrophobic IOL materials as that damage was greater and more frayed than that in hydrophilic materials. Moreover, there seems to be larger, distinctive damage area in IOLs (with chemical changes in the material) than that is visually recognizable. Therefore, a very cautious approach is recommended when performing capsulotomy, as defects in the surface structure can occur. This might come along with problems in quality of vision in monofocal and primarily premium IOLs (multifocal, enhanced depth of focus, and toric IOLs), dependent on the size, dimension, and position in the IOL. YAG capsulotomy should not be considered trivial but should be carried out with precision and without time pressure, just like surgery itself.
© 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defects in intraocular lens; Hydrophilic; Hydrophobic; Pitting of intraocular lenses; YAG shots

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221803      PMCID: PMC8259068          DOI: 10.1159/000513203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Res        ISSN: 0030-3747            Impact factor:   2.892


  20 in total

Review 1.  Effect of intraocular lens design on posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  Wolf Buehl; Oliver Findl
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Influence of neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy on ocular wavefront aberrations in pseudophakic eyes with hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Jos J Rozema; Carina Koppen; Veva de Groot; Marie-José Tassignon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Evaluation of clarity characteristics in a new hydrophobic acrylic IOL in comparison to commercially available IOLs.

Authors:  Liliana Werner; Israwal Thatthamla; Marcia Ong; Hillary Schatz; Montserrat Garcia-Gonzalez; Juan Gros-Otero; Rafael Cañones-Zafra; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Glistenings 9 years after phacoemulsification in hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Anthony Chang; Maria Kugelberg
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Neodymium:YAG laser damage threshold of foldable intraocular lenses.

Authors:  A Trinavarat; L Atchaneeyasakul; S Udompunturak
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Effect of optic size on posterior capsule opacification: 5.5 mm versus 6.0 mm AcrySof intraocular lenses.

Authors:  W R Meacock; D J Spalton; J F Boyce; R M Jose
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Claudette Abela-Formanek; Michael Amon; Gebtraud Schild; Jörg Schauersberger; Georg Heinze; Andreas Kruger
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Study of Variation in Intraocular Pressure Spike (IOP) Following Nd- YAG Laser Capsulotomy.

Authors:  Niharika K Shetty; Sriya Sridhar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  Decentration and Tilt of Intraocular Lens after Posterior Capsulotomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Murat Uzel; Serdar Ozates; Mustafa Koc; Ayse Guzin Taslipinar Uzel; Pelin Yılmazbaş
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.975

10.  5 year incidence of YAG capsulotomy and PCO after cataract surgery with single-piece monofocal intraocular lenses: a real-world evidence study of 20,763 eyes.

Authors:  Paul G Ursell; Mukesh Dhariwal; Derek O'Boyle; Javeed Khan; Alessandra Venerus
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.