| Literature DB >> 33221747 |
Anna Chen1, Yidong Wang2, Jiaqi Wu1, Dong Tang3, Qianru Zhu1, Anqian Lu1, Jin Yang1,4, Zhejun Cai2, Junping Shi1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concanavalin A (ConA)-induced liver damage of mice is a well-established murine model mimicking the human autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, the pathogenic genes of the liver injury remain to be revealed.Entities:
Keywords: Cd63; autoimmune hepatitis; concanavalin A; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33221747 PMCID: PMC7746381 DOI: 10.18632/aging.104089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Dynamics of global gene expression after ConA treatment. (A) The breakpoint distribution of 115 top dynamic genes identified by Trendy with R2 > 0.98 is shown. (B) Heatmap shows the expression of top dynamic genes in the liver samples harvested at 0h, 3h, and 24h from 10 mg/Kg ConA treated mice (GSE45413). (C) The most significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways for the top dynamic genes are shown. (D) The GO Chord plot shows the enriched biological function terms for the top dynamic genes. The genes are listed on the left side and their fold change values are shown according to the color scale.
Figure 2Validation of gene expression of top dynamic genes in the ConA hepatitis model mice. (A) The expression of two genes with the earliest or latest breakpoint time (Mmp3 at 3 h, and Aadac at 24 h) as determined by Trendy (upper panel) were verified by qRT-PCR analysis (bottom panel) of the liver tissues from the in vivo ConA-treated hepatitis model mice. (B) qRT-PCR results show the mRNA levels of the top 5 dynamic genes (Cd63, Saa3, Slc10a1, Nrxn1, Ugt2a3) in the liver tissues of the ConA-liver injury model mice at 0h, 3h, and 24 h respectively. All data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5 per group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Identification of top gene modules and hub genes related to liver injury in ConA-treated mice by WGCNA. (A) The cluster dendrogram of 6936 genes in the ConA-treated murine liver samples is shown. The colored bars at the bottom show the color that are designated for specific gene clusters (3 modules). (B) Heatmap shows the correlation between module eigengenes (ME) and the trait (time of liver injury). Each row corresponds to a single module eigengene and the corresponding column represents a trait. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation and p value. (C) Module significance (MS) of each module based on the average absolute gene significance values of all genes in a module are shown for the 3 h and 24 h time points. (D) Venn diagram shows the overlap between the top genes identified by Trendy and the module genes detected by WGCNA. The lower panel shows the significant overlap between the top dynamic genes and the module genes in the turquoise module. (E) Top 10 hub genes in the turquoise module and their gene significance values. (F) Gene co-expression network shows the relationship between Cd63 and its co-expressed genes. The node colors are denoted from green to red (low to high) based on the fold change of gene expression between 3-24 h after ConA administration relative to their expression at 0h.
Figure 4(A) qRT-PCR analysis shows Cd63 mRNA expression in the liver tissues of control (sh-Ctrl) and Cd63 knockdown (sh-Cd63) group mice. (B) Survival curves show overall survival rates of sh-Ctrl and sh-Cd63 group mice after 15mg/Kg ConA treatment. (C) Comparison of serum ALT and AST levels in the sh-Ctrl and sh-Cd63 group mice treated with ConA. (D) qRT-PCR analysis shows the relative mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory genes, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α in the liver tissues of sh-Ctrl and sh-Cd63 group mice. All data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5 per group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. (E) Representative images show H&E stained liver sections of sh-Ctrl and sh-Cd63 group mice. (F) Representative images show TUNEL stained liver sections of sh-Ctrl and sh-Cd63 mice.