Literature DB >> 33221343

Tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results of an international Delphi consensus survey.

G Saliba1, S Detlefsen2, F Carneiro3, J Conner4, R Dorer5, J F Fléjou6, H Hahn5, K Kamaradova7, L Mastracci8, S L Meijer9, E Sabo10, K Sheahan11, R Riddell4, N Wang12, R K Yantiss13, L Lundell14, D Low15, M Vieth16, F Klevebro17.   

Abstract

Complete histopathologic tumor regression after neoadjuvant treatment is a well-known prognostic factor for survival among patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. The aim of this international Delphi survey was to reach a consensus regarding the most useful tumor regression grading (TRG) system that could represent an international standard for histopathologic TRG grading of gastroesophageal carcinomas. Fifteen pathologists with special interest in esophageal and gastric pathology participated in the online survey. The initial questionnaire contained of 43 statements that addressed the following topics: (1) specimen processing, (2) gross examination, (3) cross sectioning, (4) staining, (5) Barrett's esophagus, (6) TRG systems, and (7) TRG in lymph node (LN). Participants rated the items using a 5-point Likert style scale and were encouraged to write comments for each statement. The expert panel recommended a 4-tiered TRG system for assessing the primary tumor: grade 1: No residual tumor (complete histopathologic tumor regression), grade 2: less than 10% residual tumor (near-complete regression), grade 3: 10%-50% residual tumor (partial regression), grade 4: greater than 50% residual tumor (minimal/no regression), combined with a 3-tiered system for grading therapeutic response in metastatic LNs: grade a: no residual tumor (complete histopathologic TRG), grade b: partial regression (tumor cells and regression), grade c: no regression (no sign of tumor response). This TRG grading system can be recommended as an international standard for histopathologic TRG grading in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensus; Delphi; Esophageal cancer; Gastroesophageal junction cancer; Histopathologic tumor regression grade; Neoadjuvant treatment

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221343     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  3 in total

1.  Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group.

Authors:  Deepti Dhall; Jiaqi Shi; Daniela S Allende; Kee-Taek Jang; Olca Basturk; Volkan Adsay; Grace E Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.298

2.  Pembrolizumab Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Protocol for a Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized-Controlled, Phase III Clinical Study (Keystone-002).

Authors:  Xiaobin Shang; Wencheng Zhang; Gang Zhao; Fei Liang; Chen Zhang; Jie Yue; Xiaofeng Duan; Zhao Ma; Chuangui Chen; Qingsong Pang; Weihong Zhang; Liang Liu; Xiubao Ren; Bin Meng; Peng Zhang; Yegang Ma; Lin Zhang; Hecheng Li; Xiaozheng Kang; Yin Li; Hongjing Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Developing consensus in Histopathology: the role of the Delphi method.

Authors:  Dilek Taze; Collette Hartley; Ann W Morgan; Aruna Chakrabarty; Sarah L Mackie; Kathryn J Griffin
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 7.778

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.