Literature DB >> 33221130

The COVID-19 burden for health care professionals: Results of a global survey.

Matthias Schneider1, Martin Altersberger2, Christina Binder3, Christian Hengstenberg3, Thomas Binder3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corona virus; Fear; Medical community

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221130      PMCID: PMC7659805          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


× No keyword cloud information.
At the end of December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) started to spread in the city of Wuhan, Hubei province in China, first described as novel coronavirus [1,2]. Meanwhile, the current COVID-19 pandemic has hit every country on the globe. Health care systems have since varied significantly in their response to the immense challenges. With an online survey targeting the worldwide medical community (emergency medical service, nurses, physicians, sonographers, technicians) we sought to discover experiences, fears, and successful strategies for the expected second wave. The survey was open from April 24th, 2020 until June 24th, 2020. A total of 3,090 participants from 88 countries completed the survey, 49.4% were female, sample characteristics are presented in Table 1 . During the worst times of the pandemic in their country, 238 (7.7%) reported to have suffered from a collapse of the system.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the participants and main results of the survey.

TotalCollapse of the systemNo collapseP value
Number of participants30902382850
Country USA Germany India Austria Italy United Kingdom Others502 (16.2)216 (7)179 (5.8)171 (5.5)116 (3.8)106 (3.4)1800 (58)30 (12.6)3 (1.3)14 (5.9)6 (2.5)24 (10.1)7 (2.9)154 (64.7)472 (16.5)213 (7.5)165 (5.8)165 (5.8)92 (3.2)99 (3.5)1644 (57.7)0.74
Male sex1565 (50.6)128 (53.8)1437 (50.4)0.32
Age 18-35 36-45 46-60 >60819 (24.5)863 (27.8)1035 (33.5)373 (12.1)55 (23.1)62 (26)91 (38.3)30 (12.6)763 (26.8)800 (28)944 (33.1)343 (12)0.18
Profession Sonographer Cardiologist Internist ICU doctor ER doctor General practitioner Other doctor643 (20.8)577 (18.7)382 (12.4)242 (7.8)129 (4.2)165 (5.3)557 (18)50 (21)38 (16)31 (13)31 (13)7 (2.9)14 (5.9)42 (17.7)593 (20.8)538 (18.9)351 (12.3)211 (7.4)122 (4.3)151 (5.3)515 (18.1)0.95
Workplace Tertiary hospital Local hospital Private hospital Secondary care Primary care956 (30.9)766 (24.8)550 (17.8)225 (7.3)309 (10)85 (35.7)49 (20.6)40 (16.8)16 (6.7)27 (11.3)869 (30.5)717 (25.2)510 (17.9)209 (7.3)282 (9.9)0.27
Have you personally been tested? Yes (pos) Yes (neg) No114 (3.7)840 (27.2)2134 (69.1)22 (9.2)65 (27.3)151 (63.4)92 (3.2)775 (27.2)1983 (69.6)0.006
Do you know a colleague who tested positive? Yes  No1888 (61.1)1200 (38.8)185 (77.7)53 (22.3)1703 (59.8)1147 (40.2)<0.001
Do you know a colleague who died from COVID-19? Yes No560 (18)2528 (82)97 (40.8)141 (59.2)463 (16.2)2387 (83.8)<0.001
Have you observed patients who were harmed by measures not by COVID19 Yes No1793 (58)748 (24.2)152 (63.9)47 (19.7)1640 (57.5)701 (24.6)0.13
What is your greatest fear during pandemic Falling ill/dying from COVID Financial losses Losing family member Pandemic cannot be controlled Negative impact on my career No fear414 (13.4)394 (12.8)1259 (40.7)696 (22.5)81 (2.6)246 (8)35 (14.7)22 (9.2)97 (40.8)57 (23.9)11 (4.6)16 (6.7)379 (13.3)372 (13.1)1161 (40.7)638 (22.4)70 (2.5)230 (8.1)0.75
Have you observed patients who tested negative but actually were positive No Few (1-5) Many (>5)1094 (35.4)1108 (35.9)886 (28.6)70 (29.4)62 (26.1)106 (44.5)1024 (35.9)1046 (36.7)780 (27.4)<0.001
Baseline characteristics of the participants and main results of the survey. The pandemic is having an impact on the life of all, but particularly on those in the first line of the defense, the health care professionals (HCP). In this global survey, a total of 92% of the participants reported to have fears related to the pandemic, most (41%) are afraid of losing a family member, 22.5% worry there might be no control over the pandemic, 13.4% are afraid to fall ill or die themselves, and 12.8% are afraid of private financial losses. Interestingly, there was no difference in fears between those countries where high incidence rates were reported and those where there were few COVID-19 cases. However, not only the psychological burden is high for HCP. When comparing those with a collapse of the system and those without, 9% vs. 3% (p=0.006) of the participants tested positive themselves, 78% vs. 60% (p<0.001) know a colleague who tested positive, and 41% vs. 16% (p<0.001) know a colleague who died from COVID-19. At this time, most countries are preparing for or are already experiencing the second wave. Therefore, it is essential to learn the lessons from those who went through an extreme first wave. This survey confirms the unreliability of a negative COVID-19 test. A total of 64% of the participants reported of personal experience with false-negative tests, 44% of those from countries hit hard by the pandemic reported to have seen more than five patients with an initially negative test who turned positive during their stay at the hospital. A negative test must not be considered a safe rule-out of COVID-19 if clinical suspicion is high. The pandemic of a hazardous and highly contagious virus is a medical disaster. The medical community is the group which is directly in contact with COVID-19. Therefore, their firsthand experience and opinion should have a loud voice in policy making and public health discussions: A total of 86% reported that they consider social distancing important to tackle the pandemic (Fig. 1 ). At the same time, 58% reported that they have seen patients who had a serious health hazard not due to COVID-19 but due to the lockdowns. During reduction of service or lockdowns, concepts must be implemented to ensure the medical service for those with chronic and acute diseases other than COVID-19.
Fig. 1

Answer to the question “how important do you consider social distancing?”. A total of 159 (5.1%) participants chose “rather not important”, 267 (8.6%) were undecided, and 2664 (86.2%) answered “important” or “very important”.

Answer to the question “how important do you consider social distancing?”. A total of 159 (5.1%) participants chose “rather not important”, 267 (8.6%) were undecided, and 2664 (86.2%) answered “important” or “very important”.

Declaration of Competing Interest

All authors have read and approved submission of the manuscript and have no conflict of interest to disclose.
  6 in total

1.  Plasma Levels and Renal Handling of Amino Acids Contribute to Determination of Risk of Mortality or Feed of Ventilation in Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Gábor Bánfai; Péter Kanizsai; Csaba Csontos; Szilárd Kun; Ágnes Lakatos; Anikó Lajtai; Vanessza Lelovics; Sándor Szukits; Péter Bogner; Attila Miseta; István Wittmann; Gergő A Molnár
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Influence of COVID‑19 on the Prognosis and Medication Compliance of Glaucoma Patients in the Nile Delta Region.

Authors:  Mohamed A Awwad; Mohamed Masoud
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-30

3.  HIV infection and increased risk of COVID-19 mortality: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hamidreza Kouhpayeh; Hossein Ansari
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2021-12-21

4.  Point of care echocardiography and lung ultrasound in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Martin Altersberger; Matthias Schneider; Martina Schiller; Christina Binder-Rodriguez; Martin Genger; Mounir Khafaga; Thomas Binder; Helmut Prosch
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Echocardiography and Lung Ultrasound in Long COVID and Post-COVID Syndrome A Review Document of the Austrian Society of Pneumology and the Austrian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors:  Martin Altersberger; Georg Goliasch; Mounir Khafaga; Matthias Schneider; Yerin Cho; Roland Winkler; Georg-Christian Funk; Thomas Binder; Gustav Huber; Ralf-Harun Zwick; Martin Genger
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Characteristics of Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Compared to Patients with Influenza-A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Frank Herbstreit; Marvin Overbeck; Marc Moritz Berger; Annabell Skarabis; Thorsten Brenner; Karsten Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.