Literature DB >> 33220589

Expression of putative leukemia stem cell targets in genetically-defined acute myeloid leukemia subtypes.

Breann Yanagisawa1, Brandy Perkins1, Theodoros Karantanos1, Mark Levis1, Gabriel Ghiaur1, B Douglas Smith1, Richard J Jones2.   

Abstract

Although most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients achieve complete remissions, the majority still eventually relapse and die of their disease. Rare primitive leukemia cells, so-called leukemia stem cells (LSCs), represent one potential type of resistant cell subpopulation responsible for this dissociation between response and cure. Several LSC targets have been described, but there is limited evidence about their relative utility or that targeting any can prevent relapse. LSCs not only appear to be biologically heterogeneous, but the classic immunocompromised mouse transplantation model also has serious shortcomings as an LSC assay. Out data suggest that the most immature cell phenotype that can be identified within a patient's leukemia may be clinically relevant and represent the de facto LSC. Moreover, although phenotypically heterogeneous, these putative LSCs show consistent phenotypes within individual genetically defined groups. Using this LSC definition, we studied several previously described putative LSC targets, CD25, CD26, CD47, CD96, CD123, and CLL-1, and all were expressed across heterogeneous LSC phenotypes. In addition, with the exception of CD47, there was at most low expression of these targets on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). CD123 and CLL-1 demonstrated the greatest expression differences between putative LSCs and normal HSCs. Importantly, CD123 monoclonal antibodies were cytotoxic in vitro to putative LSCs from all AML subtypes, while showing limited to no toxicity against normal HSCs and hematopoietic progenitors. Since minimal residual disease appears to be a more homogeneous population of cells responsible for relapse, targeting CD123 in this setting may be most effective.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AML; CD123; CLL-1; Leukemia stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33220589     DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Res        ISSN: 0145-2126            Impact factor:   3.156


  5 in total

Review 1.  CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Preclinical Rationale, Current Clinical Progress, and Barriers to Success.

Authors:  Salvatore Fiorenza; Cameron J Turtle
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 2.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Origin, Characteristics, and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Long; Upendarrao Golla; Arati Sharma; David F Claxton
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.692

3.  Engineering CAR-NK cells to secrete IL-15 sustains their anti-AML functionality but is associated with systemic toxicities.

Authors:  Ilias Christodoulou; Won Jin Ho; Andrew Marple; Jonas W Ravich; Ada Tam; Ruyan Rahnama; Adam Fearnow; Cambrynne Rietberg; Sean Yanik; Elena E Solomou; Ravi Varadhan; Michael A Koldobskiy; Challice L Bonifant
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 13.751

4.  Taking the STING out of acute myeloid leukemia through macrophage-mediated phagocytosis.

Authors:  William Brian Dalton; Gabriel Ghiaur; Linda Ms Resar
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 19.456

5.  Relapse Mechanism and Treatment Strategy After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Treating B-Cell Hematological Malignancies.

Authors:  Danni Xie; Xin Jin; Rui Sun; Meng Zhang; Jiaxi Wang; Xia Xiong; Xiaomei Zhang; Mingfeng Zhao
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.