Cynthia Kyin1, David R Maldonado1, Cammille C Go2, Jacob Shapira1, Ajay C Lall3, Benjamin G Domb4. 1. American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 2. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 3. American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 4. American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.. Electronic address: DrDomb@americanhipinstitute.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of hip arthroscopy as well as the rates of secondary surgery and to identify indications for surgery and noted predictors of failure. METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature was performed with the terms "hip arthroscopy," "outcomes," "patient-reported outcomes," "mid-term," "5-year," "long-term," and "10-year" in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases in April of 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data for study characteristics, patient demographics, follow-up time, indications for surgery, PROs, predictors of failure or unfavorable PROs, and rates of secondary hip preservation surgery and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were collected. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included. Four studies were level III and 9 were level IV. In total, 1571 hips were included, and the average follow-up time ranged from 60 to 240 months. The most common indications for hip arthroscopy were labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Twelve studies reported on PROs and all reported improvement at latest follow-up. The most reported on scores were the modified Harris Hip Score, Harris Hip Score, and the Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale. When grouped based on average follow-up time, the conversion rates at the 5- and 10-year time points ranged from 3.0% to 17.9% and 2.4% to 32.5%, respectively. One study with 20-year follow-up reported a conversion rate of 41.0%. Osteoarthritis and increased age were the most cited predictors for secondary surgery or decreased PROs. CONCLUSIONS: At mid- to long-term follow-up, patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated improvement in several PROs. There was great variability in rates for revision surgery and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The most common indications for hip arthroscopy were labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Osteoarthritis and increased age were the most cited predictors for unfavorable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
PURPOSE: To assess mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of hip arthroscopy as well as the rates of secondary surgery and to identify indications for surgery and noted predictors of failure. METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature was performed with the terms "hip arthroscopy," "outcomes," "patient-reported outcomes," "mid-term," "5-year," "long-term," and "10-year" in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases in April of 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data for study characteristics, patient demographics, follow-up time, indications for surgery, PROs, predictors of failure or unfavorable PROs, and rates of secondary hip preservation surgery and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were collected. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included. Four studies were level III and 9 were level IV. In total, 1571 hips were included, and the average follow-up time ranged from 60 to 240 months. The most common indications for hip arthroscopy were labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Twelve studies reported on PROs and all reported improvement at latest follow-up. The most reported on scores were the modified Harris Hip Score, Harris Hip Score, and the Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale. When grouped based on average follow-up time, the conversion rates at the 5- and 10-year time points ranged from 3.0% to 17.9% and 2.4% to 32.5%, respectively. One study with 20-year follow-up reported a conversion rate of 41.0%. Osteoarthritis and increased age were the most cited predictors for secondary surgery or decreased PROs. CONCLUSIONS: At mid- to long-term follow-up, patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated improvement in several PROs. There was great variability in rates for revision surgery and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The most common indications for hip arthroscopy were labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Osteoarthritis and increased age were the most cited predictors for unfavorable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
Authors: Jesus Mas Martinez; David Bustamante Suarez de Puga; Carmen Verdu-Roman; Enrique Martinez Gimenez; Manuel Morales Santias; Javier Sanz-Reig Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-11-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Allison K Perry; Steven F DeFroda; Safa Gursoy; Iain R Murray; Amar S Vadhera; Shane J Nho; Jorge Chahla Journal: Arthrosc Tech Date: 2021-07-21
Authors: Abhishek S Kannan; Matthew J Hartwell; Trevor Grace; Eric Hammond; Kylen K J Soriano; Richard B Souza; Alan L Zhang Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-09-05
Authors: Bailey J Ross; Ryan J Wortman; Olivia C Lee; Alfred A Mansour; Wendell W Cole; William F Sherman Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-09-30
Authors: Marc Tey-Pons; Bruno Capurro; Raúl Torres-Eguia; Fernando Marqués-López; Alfonso Leon-García; Oliver Marín-Peña Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2021-06-23