Literature DB >> 33220240

Viscosity as a key factor in decision making of nectar feeding ants.

Jimena Lois-Milevicich1, Pablo E Schilman2, Roxana Josens3.   

Abstract

It is well known that viscosity reduces the intake rates in nectar-feeding insects, such as nectivorous ants, though it remains unclear whether viscosity imposes a higher energy investment in these insects, and how this affects their feeding motivation. To address this issue, we studied feeding behavior, metabolism, and pharyngeal pump activity in the carpenter ant Camponotus mus during ingestion of ad libitum sucrose solutions. In some solutions tylose was added to modify viscosity without changing its sucrose concentration, in a way that allowed comparing: (1) two solutions with the same viscosity and different sucrose concentration (10 T and 50), and (2) two solutions with different viscosity and the same sucrose concentration (50 and 50 T). The viscosity increase was detrimental to the metabolic rate and energy balance. Ants feeding on a solution with high sucrose concentration and increased viscosity (50 T) spent extra-time until reaching a crop load similar to that reached by ingesting the solution without tylose (50). For all solutions offered, ants started feeding with the same pharyngeal pump frequencies, reflecting a similar motivation. Interesting, when ants fed on a low sucrose concentration and increased viscosity solution (10 T), their pump frequencies dropped rapidly respect to the pure-sucrose solution (50). On the contrary, pump frequencies for 50 and 50 T remained similar until the end of the intake. Since the pump frequency is strongly modulated by the ant motivation, an increase in viscosity with low sucrose content, demotivates the ants rapidly, suggesting a rapid integration of different kinds of information about the food value. Our results helped to understand how nectivorous ants could modulate their foraging decision-making.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ants; Camponotus mus; Intake rate; Metabolic rate; Motivation; Pharyngeal pump

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33220240     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  1 in total

1.  Irrational risk aversion in an ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Daniel Grimwade; Richard Bach; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.084

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.