Literature DB >> 33219671

Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study.

Jelle S Y de Jong1, Minou R Snijders Blok1, Roland D Thijs2,3, Mark P M Harms4, Martin E W Hemels5,6, Joris R de Groot1, Nynke van Dijk7, Frederik J de Lange1.   

Abstract

AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years) referred with at least one self-reported episode of transient loss of consciousness and presenting to the syncope unit between October 2012 and February 2015. The study consisted of three phases: history taking (Phase 1), autonomic function tests (AFTs) (Phase 2), and after 1.5-year follow-up with assessment by a multidisciplinary committee (Phase 3). Diagnostic yield was assessed after Phases 1 and 2. Empirical diagnostic accuracy was measured for diagnoses according to the ESC guidelines after Phase 3. The diagnostic yield after Phase 1 (history taking) was 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1-97.0%, 250/264 patients) and increased to 97.0% (93.9-98.6%, 256/264 patients) after Phase 2. The overall diagnostic accuracy (as established in Phase 3) of the Phases 1 and 2 diagnoses was 90.6% (95% CI: 86.2-93.8%, 232/256 patients). No life-threatening conditions were missed. Three patients died, two unrelated to the cause of transient loss of consciousness, and one whom remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION : A clinical work-up at a tertiary syncope unit using the ESC guidelines has a high diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety. History taking (Phase 1) is the most important diagnostic tool. Autonomic function tests never changed the Phase 1 diagnosis but helped to increase the certainty of the Phase 1 diagnosis in many patients and yield additional diagnoses in patients who remained undiagnosed after Phase 1. Diagnoses were inaccurate in 9.4%, but no serious conditions were missed. This is adequate for clinical practice.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic accuracy; Diagnostic yield; Syncope; Transient loss of consciousness

Year:  2021        PMID: 33219671     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  My good fortune to become a syncope doctor.

Authors:  Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 2.  Diagnostic criteria for initial orthostatic hypotension: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daan J L van Twist; Mark P M Harms; Veera K van Wijnen; Victoria E Claydon; Roy Freeman; William P Cheshire; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Early and late-onset syncope: insight into mechanisms.

Authors:  Parisa Torabi; Giulia Rivasi; Viktor Hamrefors; Andrea Ungar; Richard Sutton; Michele Brignole; Artur Fedorowski
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 35.855

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.