| Literature DB >> 33219657 |
Camilo Brandão-de-Resende, Helena Hollanda Santos, Angel Alessio Rojas Lagos, Camila Munayert Lara, Jacqueline Souza Dutra Arruda, Ana Paula Maia Peixoto Marino, Lis Ribeiro do Valle Antonelli, Ricardo Tostes Gazzinelli, Ricardo Wagner de Almeida Vitor, Daniel Vitor Vasconcelos-Santos.
Abstract
In 2015, an outbreak of presumed waterborne toxoplasmosis occurred in Gouveia, Brazil. We conducted a 3-year prospective study on a cohort of 52 patients from this outbreak, collected clinical and multimodal imaging findings, and determined risk factors for ocular involvement. At baseline examination, 12 (23%) patients had retinochoroiditis; 4 patients had bilateral and 2 had macular lesions. Multimodal imaging revealed 2 distinct retinochoroiditis patterns: necrotizing focal retinochoroiditis and punctate retinochoroiditis. Older age, worse visual acuity, self-reported recent reduction of visual acuity, and presence of floaters were associated with retinochoroiditis. Among patients, persons >40 years of age had 5 times the risk for ocular involvement. Five patients had recurrences during follow-up, a rate of 22% per person-year. Recurrences were associated with binocular involvement. Two patients had late ocular involvement that occurred >34 months after initial diagnosis. Patients with acquired toxoplasmosis should have long-term ophthalmic follow-up, regardless of initial ocular involvement.Entities:
Keywords: Brazil; disease outbreaks; multimodal imaging; ocular toxoplasmosis; optical coherence tomography; parasites; posterior uveitis; toxoplasmosis; uveitis; waterborne diseases; zoonoses
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33219657 PMCID: PMC7706934 DOI: 10.3201/eid2612.200227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Characteristics and ocular signs and symptoms among patients with confirmed acute toxoplasmosis infection at baseline examination, Brazil*
| Characteristics | Total, n = 52 | No ocular involvement, n = 40 | Ocular involvement, n = 12 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at infection, y, median (IQR)† | 34 (27–40) | 32 (22–38) | 43 (40–47) | <0.01 |
|
| 14 (27) | 6 (15) | 9 (75) | <0.01 |
| Sex | ||||
| M | 44 (84.6) | 33 (82.5) | 11 (91.7) | 0.50 |
| F | 8 (15.4) | 7 (17.5) | 1 (8.3) | 0.50 |
| Follow-up length, mo, median (IQR) | 36 (19–36) | 36 (12–36) | 35 (24–37) | 0.32 |
| Underlying conditions | ||||
| Arterial hypertension | 7 (13.5) | 4 (10.0) | 3 (25.0) | 0.23 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1 (1.9) | 0 | 1 (8.3) | 0.23 |
| General signs and symptoms | ||||
| Fever | 49 (94.2) | 38 (95.0) | 11 (91.7) | 0.68 |
| Headache | 33 (63.5) | 25 (62.5) | 8 (66.7) | 0.81 |
| Myalgia | 30 (57.7) | 22 (55.0) | 8 (66.7) | 0.50 |
| Lymphadenopathy | 8 (15.4) | 7 (17.5) | 1 (8.3) | 0.50 |
| Ocular signs and symptoms | ||||
| VA at baseline, logMAR, median (IQR)†‡ | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.1 (0.0–0.6) | 0.01 |
| Eye pain | 8 (15.4) | 5 (12.5) | 3 (25.0) | 0.33 |
| Self-reported recent reduction of VA† | 10 (19.2) | 1 (2.5) | 9 (75.0) | <0.01 |
| Floaters† | 3 (5.7) | 0 | 3 (25.0) | 0.01 |
*Values are no. (%), except as indicated. Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test was used to compare continuous and the mid-p exact tests for proportions between subgroups. IQR, interquartile range; logMAR, logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution scale; VA, visual acuity. †Statistical significant at α = 5%. ‡For visual acuity baseline, binocular involvement was considered the worst VA.
Figure 1Flowchart of patients in study of ocular involvement associated with a presumed waterborne toxoplasmosis outbreak, Brazil.
Characterization of patterns of retinochoroiditis seen in multimodal imaging among patients with toxoplasmosis treated with antiparasitic drugs and oral corticosteroids, Brazil*
| Type of lesion, fundus imaging modality | Patterns of retinochoroiditis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Active phase, before treatment | Cicatricial phase, after treatment | ||
| Focal necrotizing retinochoroiditis | |||
| Fundus photo or examination | Dense focal retinal whitening with indistinct borders, associated with overlying vitreous haze | Initially hypopigmented retinochoroidal scar, but frequently evolving with variable degree of pigmentation and subretinal fibrosis or preretinal gliosis | |
| SD-OCT | Focal full-thickness hyper-reflectivity and disorganization of retinal layers indicating necrotizing retinitis; surrounding retinal thickening, signaling edema; numerous overlying hyper-reflective dots at the vitreous indicating vitreal inflammatory cell exudate; and underlying fusiform choroidal thickening, with loss of stromal/luminal pattern indicating reactive choroiditis | Disorganization of retinal architecture; hyper-reflectivity at the level of the scar, but without perilesional retinal thickening; resolution of choroidal thickening; marked decrease in the number of overlying vitreal hyper-reflective dots; and frequent tent-like focal detachment of the less thickened overlying posterior hyaloid | |
| FAF reflectances | Subtle hypo- or hyper-autofluorescence changes at the level of the active lesion; near infrared reflectance can indicate active focus but not as remarkably as red-free reflectance | Increased autofluorescence signal in the first weeks, then hypo-autofluorescence at the level of the scar after several months; scars less clearly delineated by near-infrared than red-free reflectance, but both reveal retinal wrinkling in the presence of epiretinal membrane | |
| FFA | Early hypofluorescence, with progressive hyperfluorescence and late leakage at the retinochoroiditis lesion; reactive changes, including hyperfluorescence, of optic disc indicating edema; staining of venular walls, signaling periphlebitis | Variable window defects and blockage at the level of the scar; staining in the presence of subretinal fibrosis and epiretinal gliosis | |
| Punctate retinochoroiditis | |||
| Fundus photo or examination | Multiple subtle, indistinct, or confluent gray-whitish punctate retinal infiltrates with minimal vitreous haze | Very subtle changes in retinal reflex, sometimes with minor hypopigmentation, but frequently with no apparent abnormality | |
| SD-OCT | Multifocal hyper-reflectivity at the inner retinal layers, demonstrating retinitis, occasionally extending to deeper layers, with surrounding retinal thickening (edema); numerous overlying hyper-reflective dots indicating vitreal inflammatory cell exudate, along with thickening and shallow detachment of the posterior hyaloid; mild choroidal thickening without apparent major change in reflectivity | Frequent normalization of the retinal architecture, sometimes with mild disruption of outer retinal layers or retinal pigment epithelium; normalization of choroidal thickening; marked decrease in the number of overlying vitreal hyper-reflective dots and frequent tent-like focal detachment of the less-thickened overlying posterior hyaloid | |
| FAF reflectances | Subtle hypo- or hyper-autofluorescence changes at the level of the punctate active lesions; near-infrared reflectance can show changes at the area of active foci but not as remarkably as red-free reflectance | Autofluorescence and reflectance changes are minimal or absent | |
| FFA | Progressive but mild hyperfluorescence or late leakage at the site of punctate lesions; reactive changes, including hyperfluorescence of optic disc, demonstrating edema; staining of venular walls indicating periphlebitis | Normal or showing minimal punctate window defects | |
*FAF, fundus autofluorescence; FFA, fundus fluorescein angiography; SD-OCT, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Ocular characteristics, recurrences, and complications of patients with ocular involvement from toxoplasmosis, Brazil*
| Age, y/sex | Baseline eye examination | Follow-up findings | Complications | Last VA, mo; result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | Right | Left | ||||
| 38/M† | Bilateral | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells and AC cells (0.5+/4+); FE, multifocal PR and peripheral large FNR | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, PR | 1 OD recurrence; month 2, satellite active lesion | None | 21; 0.0 OU |
| 47/M† | Bilateral | VA 0.2; SLE, AV cells;FE, peripheral large FNR | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, multiple peripheral large FNR | 1 OD recurrence; month 22, new peripheral scar | Month 22, epiretinal membrane OD | 34; 0.0 OU |
| 40/M† | Bilateral | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, multifocal PR | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, multifocal PR and peripheral large FNR | Multiple recurrences OU; months 11, 21, and 24, active peripheral lesions; month 27, active peripheral lesion OS | Month 21, epiretinal membrane OD; month 27, rhegmatogenous RD OS | 36; 0.0 OD, 0.8 OS |
| 48/M† | Bilateral | VA 2.1; SL, EAV cells; FE, macular FNR | VA 0.3; SLE, AV cells;
FE, peripheral FNR | 2 recurrences OS; new peripheral scar in months 12 and 15 | Month 9, epiretinal membrane OD; month 34, epiretinal membrane OS | 34; 1.9 OD, 0.4 OS |
| 43/M† | Unilateral | VA 0.0; SLE, normal; FE, Leber miliary aneurysms | VA 0.7; SLE, fine KP, AC cells 2+/4+, and AV cells; FE, peripheral large FNR | ─ | None | 36; 0.1 OS |
| 27/M | Unilateral | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, PR | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | ─ | None | 23; 0.0 OD |
| 42/M† | Unilateral | VA 0.5; SLE, granulomatous KP, AC cells (3+/4+), AV cells; IOP, 28 mmHg; FE, peripheral large FNR | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | 1 recurrence OD; month 9, multiple active peripheral lesions OD | Baseline transient IOP elevation OD, 28mmHg | 24; 0.0 OD |
| 31/M | Unilateral | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | VA 0.0; SLE OS, AV cells; FE, multiple peripheral FNR | ─ | None | 8; 0.0 OS |
| 50/M† | Unilateral | VA 0.5; SLE, AV cells;
FE, peripheral large FNR | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | ─ | Month 6, posterior vitreous detachment OD | 37; 0.0 OD |
| 47/F† | Unilateral | VA 1.6; SLE, AV cells; FE, macular FNR | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | ─ | None | 37; 1.9 OD |
| 40/M† | Unilateral | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, peripheral large FNR | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | ─ | None | 37; 0.0 OD |
| 45/M | Unilateral | VA 0.0; SLE, AV cells; FE, PR | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | ─ | None | 37; 0.0 OD |
| 15/M‡ | NA | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | Late ocular involvement; OD VA 0.1; month 34, new peripheral scar | None | 34; 0.1 OD |
| 28/F‡ | NA | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | VA 0.0; normal SLE and FE | Late ocular involvement; OD VA 0.0; month 37, peripheral FNR | None | 39; 0.0 OD |
*Age represents age at detection of first ocular lesion or scar. AC cells, grading of anterior chamber cells according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) working group (); AV cells, anterior vitreous cells; FE, fundus examination; FNR, focal necrotizing retinochoroiditis, large FNR is >3 disk diameters; IOP, intraocular pressure; KP, keratic precipitates; NA, not applicable; OD, oculus dexter (right eye); OS, oculus sinister (left eye); OU, oculus uterque (both eyes); PR, punctate retinochoroiditis; RC, retinochoroiditis; RD, retinal detachment; SLE, slit-lamp examination; VA, visual acuity (log MAR); –, no recurrence or no new lesion. †Patients with severe ocular involvement, including binocular, macular, or extensive necrotizing retinochoroiditis (>3 disk diameters). ‡Patients with initial normal ophthalmic examination.
Figure 2A large necrotizing retinochoroiditis lesion in the right eye, detected in baseline examination (VA 0.5) of a 42-year-old man in a presumed waterborne toxoplasmosis outbreak, Brazil. A) Fundus photograph showing dense focal retinal whitening with indistinct borders, associated with overlying vitreous haze. B) Fundus fluorescein angiography; green arrow indicates hyperfluorescence of optic disc. C) Fundus fluorescein angiography; yellow arrows indicate hyperfluorescence indicating late leakage at the margins of the retinochoroiditis lesion. D) Red-free reflectance showing changes at the level of the active lesion. Green line indicates site of optical coherence tomography scan. E) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; blue arrows indicate focal full-thickness hyper-reflectivity and disorganization of retinal layers, surrounding retinal thickening, and numerous overlying hyper-reflective dots and bands, indicating exuberant inflammatory vitreous exudation. Scale bars indicate 200 µm. VA, visual acuity.
Figure 3Asymptomatic retinochoroiditis in the right eye, detected in baseline examination (VA 0.0) of a 27-year-old man in a presumed waterborne toxoplasmosis outbreak, Brazil. A) Fundus photograph showing minimal vitreous haze; box indicates enlarged area on B); green arrows indicate multiple subtle and confluent gray-whitish punctate retinal infiltrates. C) Fundus fluorescein angiography. Pink arrows indicate leakage at the site of some of the punctate lesions. D) Fundus fluorescein angiography with red-free reflectance. Green line indicates site of optical coherence tomography scan. Yellow arrows indicate changes in the area of active focuses. E) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showing retinal thickening, and numerous overlying hyper-reflective dots. Blue arrows indicate multifocal hyper-reflectivity at the inner retinal layers. Scale bars indicate 200 µm. VA, visual acuity.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier plot showing proportion of patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis at baseline who remain free of recurrence during follow-up. Bilateral retinochoroidal involvement at baseline was statistically significantly associated with recurrences by log-rank test (p = 0.01).
Figure 5Asymptomatic late retinochoroiditis in right eye detected in follow-up examination at month 37 (visual acuity 0.0) in 28-year-old woman from a presumed waterborne toxoplasmosis outbreak, Brazil. A) Fundus photograph showing focal retinal whitening with indistinct borders. B) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showing hyper-reflectivity, disorganization, and thickening of inner retinal layers (blue arrow), and numerous overlying hyper-reflective dots at the overlying vitreous and fusiform thickening of underlying choroid (yellow arrows). Scale bars indicate 200 µm.