Masataka Taniuchi1, Ryo Kawata2, Shuji Omura1, Shin- Ichi Haginomori1, Tetsuya Terada1, Masaaki Higashino1, Yoshitaka Kurisu3, Yoshinobu Hirose3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. oto034@osaka-med.ac.jp. 3. Department of Pathology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When determining treatment strategy for a salivary gland tumor, assessing histology and malignancy grade before surgery is essential. Several new diagnostic classification systems for salivary gland cytology have recently been proposed. However, none incorporate histology and grade of malignancy. METHODS: We developed a new cytology classification system that incorporates histology and grade of malignancy of salivary gland tumors (OMC classification), consisting of 11 categories. Our OMC classification was applied to 1175 patients who had preoperative cytology and confirmed final pathological diagnosis available from the past 20 years at our hospital (benign tumor: 981 patients, malignant tumor: 194 patients). RESULTS: Based on the cytology, 729 patients (62.0%) had benign histology (Category 4-1), and 87 patients (7.4%) were diagnosed with grade of malignancy (Category 6-3 + 6-4). Based on the final pathological diagnosis, the accuracy rate of Category 4-1 and Category 6-3 + 6-4 of our classification system was 93.4% and 88.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the correct diagnosis rate, the inclusion of histology and grade of malignancy in the salivary gland cytology classification was considered feasible. Thus, the OMC classification system is considered a useful tool when determining the treatment strategy for a salivary gland tumor.
BACKGROUND: When determining treatment strategy for a salivary gland tumor, assessing histology and malignancy grade before surgery is essential. Several new diagnostic classification systems for salivary gland cytology have recently been proposed. However, none incorporate histology and grade of malignancy. METHODS: We developed a new cytology classification system that incorporates histology and grade of malignancy of salivary gland tumors (OMC classification), consisting of 11 categories. Our OMC classification was applied to 1175 patients who had preoperative cytology and confirmed final pathological diagnosis available from the past 20 years at our hospital (benign tumor: 981 patients, malignant tumor: 194 patients). RESULTS: Based on the cytology, 729 patients (62.0%) had benign histology (Category 4-1), and 87 patients (7.4%) were diagnosed with grade of malignancy (Category 6-3 + 6-4). Based on the final pathological diagnosis, the accuracy rate of Category 4-1 and Category 6-3 + 6-4 of our classification system was 93.4% and 88.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the correct diagnosis rate, the inclusion of histology and grade of malignancy in the salivary gland cytology classification was considered feasible. Thus, the OMC classification system is considered a useful tool when determining the treatment strategy for a salivary gland tumor.
Authors: Kevin C C Choy; Manish M Bundele; Hao Li; Ernest W Fu; Nandini C L Rao; Ming Yann Lim Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Kartik Viswanathan; Simon Sung; Theresa Scognamiglio; Grace C H Yang; Momin T Siddiqui; Rema A Rao Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Francesco Mazzola; Ruta Gupta; Peter P Luk; Carsten Palme; Jonathan R Clark; Tsu-Hui Hubert Low Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Christopher C Griffith; Reetesh K Pai; Frank Schneider; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Jonas T Johnson; Raja R Seethala Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Ahmet Erdem Kilavuz; Murat Songu; Abdulkadir İmre; Secil Arslanoğlu; Yilmaz Özkul; Ercan Pinar; Düzgün Ateş Journal: Head Neck Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Danielle F Eytan; Linda X Yin; Zahra Maleki; Wayne M Koch; Ralph P Tufano; David W Eisele; Kofi D O Boahene; Carole Fakhry; Justin A Bishop; William H Westra; Christine G Gourin Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Johnathan M Hollyfield; Siobhan M O'Connor; Susan J Maygarden; Kevin G Greene; Lori R Scanga; Sherry Tang; Leslie G Dodd; Sara E Wobker Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Robert L Witt; David W Eisele; Randall P Morton; Piero Nicolai; Vincent Vander Poorten; Peter Zbären Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 3.325