| Literature DB >> 33219224 |
Christian Vollmer1, Jan Leitner2, Demie Kepaptsoglou3,4, Quentin M Ramasse3,5, Ashley J King6, Paul F Schofield6, Addi Bischoff7, Tohru Araki8, Peter Hoppe2.
Abstract
We report on the detection of primordial organic matter within the carbonaceous chondrite Maribo that is distinct frEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33219224 PMCID: PMC7679378 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77190-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Nitrogen and carbon isotopic compositions of Maribo OM compared to CR, CM, and IDP organic materials from both bulk and in-situ investigations. See text for references.
Carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions of the investigated organic grains with δ15Nair values < 0, together with 12C14N–/12C– ratios. Relative errors for 12C14N–/12C– are < 0.009 (based on counting statistics); for the δ15N-values, we estimate an additional uncertainty of ~ 15 ‰ due to unknown matrix effects for the OM. Isotopic ratios are given in per mil; reported errors are 1 sigma.
| Grain | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | 12C14N–/12C– | dia. (nm)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAR002_CN_04_E | 34 ± 20 | –144 ± 29 | 1.37 | 400 ± 40 |
| MAR002_CN_12_A | –44 ± 3 | –252 ± 4 | 1.19 | 2780 ± 40 |
| MAR002_CN_12_B | –32 ± 4 | –145 ± 6 | 1.12 | 1830 ± 40 |
| MAR002_chain_N_A3_1_B | –11 ± 24 | –195 ± 29 | 1.89 | 350 ± 40 |
| MAR002_chain_N_A3_3_C | 38 ± 24 | –220 ± 34 | 0.90 | 430 ± 40 |
| MAR002_chain_N_A3_5_B | 3 ± 14 | –160 ± 28 | 0.55 | 510 ± 40 |
| MAR002_chain_N_A3_6_F | 47 ± 22 | –138 ± 44 | 0.76 | 350 ± 40 |
| MAR002_chain_N_A3_7_C | 19 ± 20 | –233 ± 26 | 0.94 | 510 ± 40 |
| MAR002_CN_28_02_E | –18 ± 20 | 31 | 1.09 | 480 ± 40 |
| MAR002_CN_29_02_F | 11 ± 31 | –220 ± 44 | 1.26 | 310 ± 40 |
*All given diameters represent recalculated values, which were determined from respective areas of the (typically non-circular) organic grains by assuming a circular shape for means of comparison. Given errors are based on the assumption of an uncertainty of ± 1 pixel when determining the outline of the grain and represent the pixel size for the respective secondary ion image.
Figure 2Maribo OM data with δ15Nair < 0 compared to different solar system, molecular cloud, and interstellar reservoirs. Meteorite and IDP data have been obtained by NanoSIMS, other data spectroscopically.
Figure 3Electron microscopy images of OM morphologies within Maribo. Left: SEM-BSE image of a “coldspot” within the Maribo matrix. Middle: STEM-BF image of the small, diffuse particles (encircled) at the rim of the FIB lamella. Right: STEM-HAADF image of the organic particles (encircled) associated with tiny sulfides (bright spots) and phyllosilicates to the left.
Figure 4Electron energy loss spectra obtained on different parts of one organic grain. (a) HAADF-STEM image of the grain used for EELS measurement marked with the white rectangle, and two regions of interest marked as ROI1 and ROI 2, respectively. (b) Colored maps, corresponding to fit coefficients of the two spectra, showing the small-scale heterogeneity of the organic matter chemistry. (c) Background subtracted C-K edge EEL spectra acquired from the corresponding ROIs, plotted against a STXM spectrum for reference. Both show a prominent aromatic bonding feature at 285 eV. The spectrum corresponding to ROI2 shows an additional feature at 286.6 eV corresponding to ketone/carbonyl functional chemistry. (d) Comparison of EELS and STXM data demonstrating the reliable fit of the two techniques.
Figure 5STXM spectra obtained from both all the pixels and specific regions of interest (ROI) within the FIB lamella (see also Fig. S1). Left: Spectra obtained at the C-K edge giving similar results as the EEL spectra, but with a high signal-to-noise ratio and more spectral detail. See text for details of detected bands. Right: N-K edge spectra on these organics showing the two dominant bands due to imine/nitrile C-N bonding environments.