Literature DB >> 33219115

Effectiveness of progressive tendon-loading exercise therapy in patients with patellar tendinopathy: a randomised clinical trial.

Stephan J Breda1,2, Edwin H G Oei3, Johannes Zwerver4,5, Edwin Visser6, Erwin Waarsing2, Gabriel P Krestin3, Robert-Jan de Vos2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of progressive tendon-loading exercises (PTLE) with eccentric exercise therapy (EET) in patients with patellar tendinopathy (PT).
METHODS: In a stratified, investigator-blinded, block-randomised trial, 76 patients with clinically diagnosed and ultrasound-confirmed PT were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either PTLE or EET. The primary end point was clinical outcome after 24 weeks following an intention-to-treat analysis, as assessed with the validated Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for patellar tendons (VISA-P) questionnaire measuring pain, function and ability to play sports. Secondary outcomes included the return to sports rate, subjective patient satisfaction and exercise adherence.
RESULTS: Patients were randomised between January 2017 and July 2019. The intention-to-treat population (mean age, 24 years, SD 4); 58 (76%) male) consisted of patients with mostly chronic PT (median symptom duration 2 years). Most patients (82%) underwent prior treatment for PT but failed to recover fully. 38 patients were randomised to the PTLE group and 38 patients to the EET group. The improvement in VISA-P score was significantly better for PTLE than for EET after 24 weeks (28 vs 18 points, adjusted mean between-group difference, 9 (95% CI 1 to 16); p=0.023). There was a trend towards a higher return to sports rate in the PTLE group (43% vs 27%, p=0.13). No significant between-group difference was found for subjective patient satisfaction (81% vs 83%, p=0.54) and exercise adherence between the PTLE group and EET group after 24 weeks (40% vs 49%, p=0.33).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PT, PTLE resulted in a significantly better clinical outcome after 24 weeks than EET. PTLE are superior to EET and are therefore recommended as initial conservative treatment for PT. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise rehabilitation; overuse injury; randomised controlled trial; sports rehabilitation programs; tendinopathy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33219115     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  5 in total

1.  Current Clinical Concepts: Clinical Management of Patellar Tendinopathy.

Authors:  Adam B Rosen; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Mike Nicola; Matthew A Tao
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.824

2.  Management of patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised studies.

Authors:  Dimitris Challoumas; Carles Pedret; Mairiosa Biddle; Nigel Yong Boon Ng; Paul Kirwan; Blair Cooper; Patrick Nicholas; Scott Wilson; Chris Clifford; Neal L Millar
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-11-29

3.  High-Volume Image-Guided Injections in Achilles and Patellar Tendinopathy in a Young Active Military Population: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Robert M Barker-Davies; Polly Baker; James Watson; Duncan Goodall; Patrick C Wheeler; Alastair M Nicol; Daniel T P Fong; Mark P Lewis; Alexander N Bennett
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 4.  The Influence of Different Modes of Exercise on Healthy and Injured Tendons.

Authors:  Kaiyong Wang; Linlin Zhao
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.131

Review 5.  Ballet Rehabilitation: A Novel Return to Sport Protocol.

Authors:  Laurie Glasser; Marie Frey; Giulia C Frias; Bobby Varghese; Justin X Melendez; Joseph D Hawes; Jared Escobar; Brian M Katt
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.