Ben Lewis1, Julianne L Price2, Christian C Garcia2, Natalie C Ebner3, Sara Jo Nixon2. 1. University of Florida, Department of Psychiatry, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Florida, Department of Psychology, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Florida, Center for Addiction Research & Education, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: benlewis@ufl.edu. 2. University of Florida, Department of Psychiatry, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Florida, Department of Psychology, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Florida, Center for Addiction Research & Education, Gainesville, FL, United States. 3. University of Florida, Department of Psychology, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Florida, Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, Institute on Aging, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) often display compromise in emotional processing and non-affective neurocognitive functions. However, relatively little empirical work explores their intersection. In this study, we examined working memory performance when attending to and ignoring facial stimuli among adults with and without AUD. We anticipated poorer performance in the AUD group, particularly when task demands involved ignoring facial stimuli. Whether this relationship was moderated by facial emotion or participant sex were explored as empirical questions. METHODS: Fifty-six controls (30 women) and 56 treatment-seekers with AUD (14 women) completed task conditions in which performance was advantaged by either attending to or ignoring facial stimuli, including happy, neutral, or fearful faces. Group, sex, and their interaction were independent factors in all models. Efficiency (accuracy/response time) was the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS: An interaction between group and condition (F1,107 = 6.03, p < .02) was detected. Individual comparisons suggested this interaction was driven by AUD-associated performance deficits when ignoring faces, whereas performance was equivalent between groups when faces were attended. Secondary analyses suggested little influence of specific facial emotions on these effects. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide partial support for initial hypotheses, with the AUD group demonstrating poorer working memory performance conditioned on the inability to ignore irrelevant emotional face stimuli. The absence of group differences when scenes were to be ignored (faces remembered) suggests the AUD-associated inability to ignore irrelevance is influenced by specific stimulus qualities.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) often display compromise in emotional processing and non-affective neurocognitive functions. However, relatively little empirical work explores their intersection. In this study, we examined working memory performance when attending to and ignoring facial stimuli among adults with and without AUD. We anticipated poorer performance in the AUD group, particularly when task demands involved ignoring facial stimuli. Whether this relationship was moderated by facial emotion or participant sex were explored as empirical questions. METHODS: Fifty-six controls (30 women) and 56 treatment-seekers with AUD (14 women) completed task conditions in which performance was advantaged by either attending to or ignoring facial stimuli, including happy, neutral, or fearful faces. Group, sex, and their interaction were independent factors in all models. Efficiency (accuracy/response time) was the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS: An interaction between group and condition (F1,107 = 6.03, p < .02) was detected. Individual comparisons suggested this interaction was driven by AUD-associated performance deficits when ignoring faces, whereas performance was equivalent between groups when faces were attended. Secondary analyses suggested little influence of specific facial emotions on these effects. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide partial support for initial hypotheses, with the AUD group demonstrating poorer working memory performance conditioned on the inability to ignore irrelevant emotional face stimuli. The absence of group differences when scenes were to be ignored (faces remembered) suggests the AUD-associated inability to ignore irrelevance is influenced by specific stimulus qualities.
Authors: Ben Lewis; Christian C Garcia; Jeff Boissoneault; Julianne L Price; Sara Jo Nixon Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Pierre Maurage; Salvatore Campanella; Pierre Philippot; Ian Charest; Sophie Martin; Philippe de Timary Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Reinout W Wiers; Katrijn Houben; Javad S Fadardi; Paul van Beek; Mijke Rhemtulla; W Miles Cox Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Ben Lewis; Christian C Garcia; Julianne L Price; Susanne Schweizer; Sara Jo Nixon Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.852