Literature DB >> 33216937

Neural mechanisms of reward and loss processing in a low-income sample of at-risk adolescents.

Laura Murray1,2,3, Nestor L Lopez-Duran1, Colter Mitchell4,5, Christopher S Monk1,5,6, Luke W Hyde1,5.   

Abstract

Adolescence is a time of engagement in risky, reward-driven behaviors, with concurrent developmental changes within reward-related neural systems. As previous research has recruited mostly higher socioeconomic, European and European American participants, therefore limiting generalizability to the US population, especially for populations of color or low-income populations. The current study provided one of the first opportunities to examine the neural correlates of reward and loss functioning in a population-based sample of adolescents at increased risk for poverty-related adversities. The study investigated neural reward and loss processing and whether age, pubertal status and the social constructs of gender and race predicted individual differences in reward- and loss-related brain function. One hundred and twenty-eight primarily low-income adolescents (mean age: 15.9 years, 75% African American) from urban environments completed a modified monetary incentive delay task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Consistent with the previous research, reward and loss anticipation recruited similar motivational circuitry including striatal, insular, thalamic and supplementary motor areas. Race and gender were not associated with reward- or loss-related neural reactivity. Age and pubertal development were associated with differences in neural reactivity to reward and loss, suggesting that older and more mature adolescents had increased activity in sensory and motivational circuits, but decreased activity in regions responsible for error detection and behavior modification.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescence; fMRI; loss; reward

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33216937      PMCID: PMC7759206          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   4.235


  38 in total

1.  Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents.

Authors:  Adriana Galvan; Todd A Hare; Cindy E Parra; Jackie Penn; Henning Voss; Gary Glover; B J Casey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: who is at risk?

Authors:  Adriana Galvan; Todd Hare; Henning Voss; Gary Glover; B J Casey
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-03

3.  Race, racism and health: disparities, mechanisms, and interventions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brondolo; Linda C Gallo; Hector F Myers
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-12-17

Review 4.  Cultural neuroscience: a once and future discipline.

Authors:  Joan Y Chiao
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking.

Authors:  Laurence Steinberg
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 6.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Midcingulate cortex: Structure, connections, homologies, functions and diseases.

Authors:  Brent A Vogt
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.052

8.  Validity of self-report measures of girls' pubertal status.

Authors:  J Brooks-Gunn; M P Warren; J Rosso; J Gargiulo
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1987-06

9.  Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior.

Authors:  Barbara R Braams; Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde; Jiska S Peper; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural networks involved in adolescent reward processing: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Merav H Silverman; Kelly Jedd; Monica Luciana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  Antisocial behavior is associated with reduced frontoparietal activity to loss in a population-based sample of adolescents.

Authors:  Laura Murray; Nestor L Lopez-Duran; Colter Mitchell; Christopher S Monk; Luke W Hyde
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 10.592

Review 2.  Visualizing Research Trends on Culture Neuroscience (2008-2021): A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Han Qing Xu; Chih-Chao Chung; Cheng Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Interactions between methodological and interindividual variability: How Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task contrast maps vary and impact associations with behavior.

Authors:  Michael I Demidenko; Alexander S Weigard; Karthikeyan Ganesan; Hyesue Jang; Andrew Jahn; Edward D Huntley; Daniel P Keating
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.

Authors:  Michael I Demidenko; Edward D Huntley; Alexander S Weigard; Daniel P Keating; Adriene M Beltz
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Stronger brain activation for own baby but similar activation toward babies of own and different ethnicities in parents living in a multicultural environment.

Authors:  Bindiya Lakshmi Raghunath; Kelly Hwee Leng Sng; S H Annabel Chen; Vimalan Vijayaragavan; Balázs Gulyás; Peipei Setoh; Gianluca Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A brief child-friendly reward task reliably activates the ventral striatum in two samples of socioeconomically diverse youth.

Authors:  Melissa K Peckins; Heidi B Westerman; S Alexandra Burt; Laura Murray; Martha Alves; Alison L Miller; Ashley N Gearhardt; Kelly L Klump; Julie C Lumeng; Luke W Hyde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.