| Literature DB >> 33216768 |
Mahboubeh Pishnamazi1,2, Ali Taghvaie Nakhjiri3, Mashallah Rezakazemi4, Azam Marjani5,6, Saeed Shirazian7.
Abstract
Naphtha catalytic reforming (NCR) process has been of tremendous attention all over the world owing to the significant requirement for high-quality gasoline. Industrialized naphtha reforming unit at oil refineries applies a series of fixed bed reactors (FBRs) to improve the quality of the low-octane hydrocarbons and convert them to more valuable products. The prominent purpose of this research is to understand the catalytic reactor of naphtha reforming unit. For this aim, an appropriate mechanistic modeling and its related CFD-based computational simulation is presented to predict the behavior of the system when the reactors are of the axial flow type. Also, the triangular meshing technique (TMT) is performed in this paper due to its brilliant ability to analyze the results of model's predictions along with improving the computational accuracy. Additionally, mesh independence analysis is done to find the optimum number of meshes needed for reaching the results convergence. Moreover, suitable kinetic and thermodynamic equations are derived based on Smith model to describe the NCR process. The results proved that the proceeding of NCR process inside the reactor significantly increased the concentration amount of aromatic materials, lighter ends and hydrogen, while deteriorated the concentration amount of naphthene and paraffin. Moreover, the pressure drop along the reactor length was achieved very low, which can be considered as one of the momentous advantages of NCR process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33216768 PMCID: PMC7679015 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Heat of reactions and rate constants for NCR process [16].
| ΔH298K | E | B | A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71038.06 | 30630 | 21.4 | 9.87 | |
| -36953.33 | 51670 | 32.54 | 9.87 | |
| -51939.31 | 57211 | 39.54 | 1 | |
| -56597.54 | 57211 | 39.45 | 1 | |
| -- | 50580 | 54 | 1040 | |
| -- | 9150 | -9.43 | 9.87 |
Required parameters for model development.
| Parameter | Unit | Value | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter of reactor (D) | m | 1.25 | [ |
| Reactor length (L) | m | 6.29 | [ |
| Cross section (Ac) | m2 | 1.2272 | Calculated from [ |
| Fluid viscosity (μ) | mPa.s | 0.01 | [ |
| Fluid velocity (u0) | m/s | 0.58 | [ |
| Fluid density (ρf) | kg/m3 | 14.904 | [ |
| Specific heat capacity (Cpf) | J/(kg.K) | 3384.6 | [ |
| Temperature (Ti) | K | 777 | [ |
| Pressure (Pi) | kPa | Ptotal | [ |
| Ptotal | kPa | 3703 | [ |
| Volumetric flow rate (Q) | m3/s | 0.71177 | [ |
| Porosity of catalyst (ε) | -- | 0.36 | [ |
| Specific surface (As) | m2 | 3.29 | [ |
| Diameter of catalytic particles (dp) | m | 4.7×10−3 | [ |
| Mole fraction of naphtha (xn) | -- | 0.0461 | [ |
| Mole fraction of paraffin (xp) | -- | 0.0631 | [ |
| Mole fraction of aromatics (xa) | -- | 0.0188 | [ |
| Mole fraction of lighter components (xl) | -- | 0.266 | [ |
| Mole fraction of hydrogen (xh) | -- | 0.606 | [ |
| Naphtha concentration (cn) | mol/m3 | 26.462 | Calculated from [ |
| Paraffin concentration (cp) | mol/m3 | 36.17 | Calculated from [ |
| Aromatics concentration (ca) | mol/m3 | 10.777 | Calculated from [ |
| Hydrogen concentration (ch) | mol/m3 | 347.37 | Calculated from [ |
| Lighter components concentration (cl) | mol/m3 | 152.48 | Calculated from [ |
Fig 1Implemented TMT inside the domain of catalytic reactor.
The influence of mesh numbers on the amount of naphthene concentration at the outlet of the NCR reactor.
| Number of mesh | Naphthene concentration at the outlet of the NCR reactor |
|---|---|
| 60 | 9.70 |
| 120 | 10.25 |
| 180 | 10.50 |
| 240 | 10.80 |
| 300 | 11.00 |
| 360 | 11.197 |
| 420 | 11.198 |
| 480 | 11.199 |
| 540 | 11.20 |
Comparison of model prediction and plant data.
| Number of Reactor | Outlet temperature of Plant (K) | Outlet temperature of NPBR (Model prediction) (K) | ARD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | 722 | 723 | 0.13 |
Fig 2Concentration profile of a) naphthene and b) aromatic materials inside the NCR reactor.
Fig 3Concentration gradient of lighter ends along the length of NCR reactor.
Fig 4Temperature profile along the NCR reactor length.
Fig 5Pressure profile inside the NCR reactor.
Fig 6Concentration profiles of hydrogen along the reactor length.
Fig 7Concentration profiles of paraffin along the reactor length.