Literature DB >> 33216246

The "impossible" rectal anastomosis: a novel use for endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy.

Nadja C Lehwald-Tywuschik1, Andrea Alexander1, Nour Alkhanji1, Georg Flügen1, Stephen Fung1, Alexander Rehders1, Wolfram Trudo Knoefel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Low rectal anastomoses can safely be performed, usually secured by a diverting ostomy. However, in cases of inflammation, extensive scarring, after extensive radiation, or after severe stapler dysfunction the risk for an anastomotic leak may become prohibitively high. We present a novel use for endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy (EVAT) for otherwise "impossible" low rectal anastomoses.
METHODS: Our initial series consisted of 14 consecutive patients who underwent prophylactic EVAT treatment due to unsafe low colorectal anastomosis. The vacuum sponge was placed intraoperatively in cases otherwise calling for a Hartmann's procedure. An open-pored polyurethane sponge was placed prophylactically transanally for a mean duration of 11 days. Patient characteristics, complications, and risk factors were prospectively collected from medical records and analyzed.
RESULTS: Between March 2017 and September 2019, we performed this novel technique in 14 patients enabling us to perform an anastomosis. Our collective consisted of 4 female (29%) and 10 male (71%) patients with a medium age of 59 years. Underlying disease was colorectal cancer in 10 patients, ovarian cancer, perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, ischemic colitis and sarcoma in one patient each. Dominant factors putting the anastomosis at extremely high risk were acute inflammation (n = 2), frozen pelvis (n = 2), intraoperative local chemotherapy (n = 2), stapler dysfunction (n = 2), non-closable rectal stump (n = 2), empty pelvis (n = 1) and ultra-low anastomosis (n = 3). Prophylactic EVAT was successful in 92% and gastrointestinal continuity was preserved in all patients.
CONCLUSION: This is the first description of prophylactic EVAT treatment. It seems to be a simple and safe method to enforce the high-risk low rectal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Endosponge; Prophylaxis; Vacuum therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33216246      PMCID: PMC7847453          DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02363-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  9 in total

1.  Endoluminal vacuum therapy for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection.

Authors:  R Weidenhagen; K U Gruetzner; T Wiecken; F Spelsberg; K-W Jauch
Journal:  Rozhl Chir       Date:  2008-08

2.  Endoluminal vacuum therapy for anastomotic leaks after rectal surgery.

Authors:  A Arezzo; A Miegge; A Garbarini; M Morino
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Long-term efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of colorectal anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Mauro Verra; Roberto Passera; Alberto Bullano; Lisa Rapetti; Mario Morino
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 4.  Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  F D McDermott; A Heeney; M E Kelly; R J Steele; G L Carlson; D C Winter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  G I Popivanov; V M Mutafchiyski; R Cirocchi; S D Chipeva; V V Vasilev; K Ts Kjossev; M S Tabakov
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Vacuum-assisted early transanal closure of leaking low colorectal anastomoses: the CLEAN study.

Authors:  W A A Borstlap; G D Musters; L P S Stassen; H L van Westreenen; D Hess; S van Dieren; S Festen; E J van der Zaag; P J Tanis; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The Dutch multicenter experience of the endo-sponge treatment for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P J van Koperen; M I van Berge Henegouwen; C Rosman; C M Bakker; P Heres; J F M Slors; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dörthe Seidel; Stephan Diedrich; Florian Herrle; Henryk Thielemann; Frank Marusch; Rebekka Schirren; Recca Talaulicar; Tobias Gehrig; Nadja Lehwald-Tywuschik; Matthias Glanemann; Jörg Bunse; Martin Hüttemann; Chris Braumann; Oleg Heizmann; Marc Miserez; Thomas Krönert; Stephan Gretschel; Rolf Lefering
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Emerging evidence and recent controversies in diverticulitis: a 5-year review.

Authors:  Marina Affi Koprowski; Arthur Affleck; Vassiliki Liana Tsikitis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.