| Literature DB >> 33214767 |
Rajiv Das Kangabam1, Yumnam Silla1, Gunajit Goswami1, Madhumita Barooah1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms are an important component of an aquatic ecosystem and play a critical role in the biogeochemical cycle which influences the circulation of the materials and maintains the balance in aquatic ecosystems.Entities:
Keywords: Wetlands; bio-indicators; biogeochemical; keystone; land use; metagenomics; microbial diversity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33214767 PMCID: PMC7604743 DOI: 10.2174/1389202921999200716104355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Genomics ISSN: 1389-2029 Impact factor: 2.236
Fig. (3)Co-occurrence microbial interaction sub-network from Post-monsoon season. Blue squared nodes correspond to physicochemical parameters and circle notes correspond to OTUs. The green and red edges represent positive correlation and negative correlation respectively. Physicochemical parameters represent as pH; power of hydrogen, BOD; Biological Oxygen Demand, Ca; Calcium, COD; Chemical Oxygen Demand, Cl; Chlorine, DO; Dissolved oxygen, MoA; Methyl Orange Alkalinity, Mg; Magnesium, SA; Salinity, TDS; Total Dissolved Solids, TH; Total Hardness, Tm; Temperature, TSS; Total Suspended Solids. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (4)Co-occurrence microbial interaction sub-network from winter season. Blue squared nodes correspond to physicochemical parameters and circle notes correspond to OTUs. The green and red edges represent positive correlation and negative correlation respectively. Physicochemical parameters represent as pH; power of hydrogen, BOD; Biological Oxygen Demand, Ca; Calcium, COD; Chemical Oxygen Demand, Cl; Chlorine, DO; Dissolved oxygen, MoA; Methyl Orange Alkalinity, Mg; Magnesium, SA; Salinity, TDS; Total Dissolved Solids, TH; Total Hardness, Tm; Temperature, TSS; Total Suspended Solids. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Description of sampling sites across the Loktak Lake with varying land use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loktak 1 | 240 50’ 74” N | 930 78’ 47” E | 771 m | Tourist and water sports | Open water area famous among the tourist coming to see Loktak lake |
| Loktak 2 | 240 31’ 86” N | 930 41’ 102” E | 759 m | Aquacultures and human settlement | Area inside the Loktak lake inhabited by the local people with mostly aquaculture activities |
| Loktak 3 | 240 53’ 86” N | 930 83’ 40” E | 768 m | Runoff of water and floating island from the Lake | Area between Thanga Karang (island) and Thanga |
| Loktak 4 | 240 47’ 71” N | 930 81’ 38” E | 759 m | National Park | Floating island surrounded by human settlement |
| Loktak 5 | 240 34’ 34” N | 930 46’ 43” E | 768 m | Aquaculture and open water area | Aquaculture and water runoff for hydroelectric project |
Details of quality of reads, GC content and observed OTUs of each sample from Post- monsoon and winter data.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Loktak L1 | 775,011 | 57 | 5377 | 256,843 | 56 | 4048 |
| Loktak L2 | 540,600 | 57 | 3656 | 258,267 | 56 | 4263 |
| Loktak L3 | 672,324 | 57 | 5995 | 230,764 | 56 | 3734 |
| Loktak L4 | 615,990 | 57 | 5945 | 314,527 | 58 | 2636 |
| Loktak L5 | 458,397 | 57 | 6250 | 265,306 | 58 | 2207 |
Summary of environmental variables of sampling: Means and standard deviations.
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| pH | 6.54±0.02 | 6.82±0.01 | 6.75±0.02 | 6.83±0.02 | 6.73±0.01 | 7.81±0.12 | 7.3±0.1 | 7.27±0.1 | 6.55±0.1 | 7.03±0.13 |
| Temperature | 28±0.00 | 27.4±0.01 | 27.3±0.13 | 26.3±0.01 | 27.2±0.11 | 21.2±0.13 | 22.8±0.1 | 21.5±0.13 | 20.4±0.06 | 20.7±0.05 |
| Salinity | 0.018±0.00 | 0.012±0.02 | 0.025±0.016 | 0.018±0.12 | 0.012±0.06 | 0.014±0.024 | 0.01±0.012 | 0.01±0.02 | 0.01±0.0 | 0.01±0.0 |
| Turbidity | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1±0.1 | ND | ND | ND | 2±0.02 | 2±0.04 |
| Total Hardness | 35±0.32 | 50±0.22 | 60±0.26 | 55±0.18 | 50±0.32 | 50±0.24 | 55±0.34 | 50±0.26 | 45±0.22 | 45±0.18 |
| Calcium | 0.4±0.02 | 0.8±0.01 | 0.8±0.02 | 0.4±0.02 | 0.6±0.04 | 0.4±0.02 | 0.8±0.02 | 0.8±0.018 | 0.4±0.06 | 0.6±0.04 |
| Magnesium | 0.6±0.03 | 0.7±0.12 | 0.9±0.16 | 1.1±0.04 | 0.8±0.13 | 0.9±0.06 | 0.85±0.12 | 0.7±0.21 | 0.85±0.04 | 0.7±0.02 |
| Iron | 1.6±0.06 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.68±0.04 | 0.5±0.03 | 1.1±0.10 | 0.015±0.01 | 0.077±0.021 | 0.087±0.04 | 3.8±1.2 | 0.6±0.3 |
| Sulphate | < 0.5±0.0 | < 0.5±0.0 | < 0.5±0.0 | < 0.5±0.0 | < 0.5±0.0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | < 5.0±0.0 |
| Chloride | 10.4±2.4 | 7±1.2 | 14±4.5 | 10.4±3.6 | 7±2.8 | 7.81±2.6 | 5.6±1.24 | 6.8±1.6 | 7.28±2.8 | 5.8±3.2 |
| Phenolphthelain Alkalinity | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Methyl orange Alkalinity | 35.2±4.68 | 48±6.0 | 41.6±4.6 | 51.2±.4.2 | 4.59±3.3 | 38.5±0.22 | 46.7±0.36 | 49.5±0.48 | 35.7±6.32 | 41.2±0.36 |
| Dissolved Oxygen | 4.46±0.24 | 4.09±2.2 | 4.45±1.67 | 4.19±2.32 | 4.55±1.68 | 11.98±2.54 | 6.99±3.16 | 8.04±2.12 | 6.89±1.86 | 5.99±3.2 |
| Total dissolved solid | 43.5±4.5 | 55.4±3.8 | 64.9±6.2 | 53.5±5.2 | 47.7±4.8 | 44.7±4.6 | 57.3±3.8 | 61.8±4.16 | 44.5±4.32 | 55±5.16 |
| Total suspended solid | 125±12.4 | 124±22.2 | 117±12,43 | 164±20.34 | 121±9.76 | 50±8.32 | 115±8.46 | 132±6.68 | 270±15.2 | 285±14.68 |
| COD | 147.5±60.10 | 200±11.31 | 210±14.14 | 146.5±54.44 | 239±12.72 | 189±12.72 | 183.5±12.02 | 205±21.21 | 178±14.14 | 224±19.79 |
| BOD | 84±6.46 | 85±5.12 | 88±6.86 | 83±4.28 | 89±7.82 | 87±8.46 | 92±6.74 | 91±8.68 | 87±5.68 | 90±7.68 |
| Total Count | 200 + | 100+ | 100+ | 200+ | 200+ | 80+ | 50+ | 50+ | 80+ | 110+ |
| MPN coliform | 25±0.24 | 30±0.26 | 25±0.32 | 20±0.14 | 35±0.46 | 60±0.54 | 20±0.28 | 30±0.42 | 40±0.22 | 110±0.38 |
| MPN | 8±0.12 | 15±0.24 | 10±0.28 | 8±0.18 | 20±0.36 | 5±0.04 | 6±0.34 | 5±0.56 | 4±0.18 | 7±0.46 |
post-monsoon. Deltaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria accounting for 4.2%, 4.55%, and 4.02%, respectively were the major classes belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria (Supplementary Table ). A comparison of the seasonal profile of Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria population revealed an increased by 0.66% and 2.37% during winter (Supplementary Table ), while Proteobacteria decreased by 1.91% during the same period.
Summary of keystone taxa detected in Loktak Lake.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Grasslands | Burkholderiales, Sphingobacteriales, Clostridiales, Actinomycetales, Acidobacteria | [ |
| Forest or woodlands | Actinomycetales, Acidobacteria, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Clostridiales, Sphingobacteriales; Rhodobacterales, Verrucomicrobia | [ |
| Agricultural lands | Gemmatimonas, Acidobacteria, Xanthomonadales, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Solirubrobacterales, Verrucomicrobia | [ |
| Arctic and Antarctic ecosystems | Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria | [ |
| Contaminated soil | Rhizobiales, Nitrospira, Pseudomonadales, Actinobacteria | [ |
| Plant-associated microbiota | Acidobacteria, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, Bacteroidetes, Frankiales | [ |
| Aquatic ecosystems | Pelagibacter, Oceanospirillales, Flavobacteriaceae, Nitrospira, Alteromonadaceae, Chromatium, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Candidatus | [ |
| Agricultural lands | Gemmatimonas, Acidobacteria | [ |
| Human oral microbiome | Porphyromonas | [ |
| Human gut microbiome | Helicobacter pylori, Actinobacteria, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides stercoris, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Ruminococcus bromii, Klebsiella pneumoniae | [ |