| Literature DB >> 33213426 |
Alia M Aldahlawi1,2, Amani T Alzahrani3, Mohamed F Elshal4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Boswellia sacra resin has been commonly used as analgesic, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties, which reflect its immunomodulatory activity. Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and sentinel cells that regulate the immune response. This study aims at investigating whether crude essential oil extracted from Boswellia sacra resin (BSEO), has a potential effect on the phenotype and functions of human monocyte-derived DCs.Entities:
Keywords: And tolerance; Boswellia sacra; Dendritic cells; Differentiation; Essential oil; Maturation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33213426 PMCID: PMC7678202 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03146-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Viabilities of HSD cells and peripheral blood monocytes. Trypan blue exclusion assay was used to determine the viabilities of cells upon treatment with different concentrations of crude BSEO as determined by
| Cells (%) | BSEO Concentrations (μg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 50 | |
| 96.1 ± 1.6 | 95.1 ± 3.2 | 92.6 ± 5.8 | 88.5 ± 0.5 | 87.6 ± 5.7 | 52.1 ± 2.9** | |
| 96.1 ± 0.4 | 90.9 ± 0.2 | 89.3 ± 1.2 | 87.6 ± 4.9 | 84.9 ± 7.7 | 72.5 ± 7.3* | |
Data demonstrated as percentages of viability ± SD and presented as mean of three independent experiments
(*) Referred to significant value compared to control untreated viable cells, where *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood monocytes. Cell surface markers Expression upon differentiation in response to BSEO
| Cell surface markers | Negative control 0.1%DMSO | Differentiation inducers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive control (GM-CSF plus IL-4) | BSEO 5 μg/mL | BSEO 10 | ||
| CD14 | 87.1 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 87.05 ± 2.6*** | 88.6 ± 1*** |
| CD11c | 8.9 ± 4.7 | 97.2 ± 2.1 | 5.45 ± 3.6*** | 8.7 ± 2.2*** |
| HLA-DR | 96.9 ± 0.5 | 99.4 ± 0.8 | 90.9 ± 8.9 | 95.5 ± 1.3 |
| CD86 | 57.3 ± 2.9 | 8.9 ± 2.5 | 77.8 ± 6.9** | 57.9 ± 13.4* |
Data presented as mean percentages (%) of markers expression obtained from three different individuals ± SD
(*) Referred to significant value compared to the positive control, where * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001
Fig. 1Morphology of DCs treated with crude BSEO. DCs were treated with either crude BSEO or LPS for 24 h and visualized using an inverted microscope. a Represents 0.1%DMSO-treated DCs that show a typical morphology of imDCs, which appeared irregular shape with short cytoplasmic projections. b Represents LPS-treated DCs that show a typical morphology of mDCs which seen elongated with long cytoplasmic projection. c Represents DCs treated with 5 μg/mL of BSEO and d DCs treated with 10 μg/mL of BSEO that exhibited imDCs features. Arrows pointed to DC projections. Photographed by phase-contrast inverted microscope (Original magnifications were 400X) at Immunology unit, KFMRC, King Abdulaziz University
Flow cytometry analysis of dendritic cells. DCs surface markers expression after stimulation with different inducers including BSEO
| Cell surface markers (%) | Negative control 0.1%DMSO | Stimulation inducers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive control LPS | BSEO 5 | BSEO 10 | VIT- D3 | ||
| CD14 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 92.7 ± 10.7 |
| CD11c | 94.7 ± 1.8 | 95.7 ± 0.2 | 95.0 ± 2.7 | 96.1 ± 0.7 | 94.8 ± 0.5 |
| HLA-DR | 96.0 ± 2.1 | 98.8 ± 0.3 | 89.4 ± 15.5 | 91.0 ± 14.2 | 92.7 ± 0.5 |
| CD83 | 4.49 ± 0.5 | 82.4 ± 1.2 | 4.6 ± 0.9*** | 4.5 ± 2.3*** | 4.4 ± 2*** |
| CD80 | 49.1 ± 7.3 | 97.0 ± 3.3 | 54.5 ± 7.5*** | 54.8 ± 11.9** | 55.2 ± 10.4** |
| CD86 | 25.8 ± 23.7 | 97.1 ± 2.1 | 24.3 ± 15.0*** | 57.9 ± 13.4*** | 22.7 ± 21.3 |
| CCR7 | 38.5 ± 19.9 | 73.1 ± 1.9 | 73.4 ± 19.4* | 45.4 ± 16.4* | 46 ± 16.2* |
Data presented as mean percentages (%) of markers expression of dendritic cells obtained from three different individuals ± SD. Note: (*) Referred to significant difference when compared to the positive control, where *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001
Flow cytometry analysis of the expression of CD83 and CD86 markers. LPS-stimulated DCs in combination with different inducers were evaluated for the expression of CD83 and CD86 markers
| Cell surface markers (%) | Negative control 0.1%DMSO | Stimulation inducers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive control LPS | LPS + BSEO 5 μg/mL | LPS + BSEO 10 | ||
| CD86 | 7.6 ± 2.9 | 96.5 ± 2.2 | 82.0 ± 11.8 | 88.7 ± 4.0 |
| CD83 | 5.5 ± 1.9 | 82.4 ± 1.2 | 27.8 ± 2.2*** | 36.6 ± 2.2*** |
Data presented as mean percentages of markers expression obtained from three different individuals ± SD. Note: (*) Referred to significant difference when compared to LPS-stimulated DCs only, where ***P < 0.001
Percentages of viable, early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic DCs upon stimulation. The results shown were from three independent experiments with mean ± SD
| Type (%) | Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS | BSEO-5 | BSEO-10 | VIT-D3 | CPT | Control | |
| Viable cells | 88.6 ± 1.0 | 88.2 ± 4.8 | 87.4 ± 3.9 | 87.5 ± 7.3 | 61.3 ± 5.8 | 88.7 ± 5.4 |
| Early Apoptosis | *** 3.1 ± 0.8 | *** 2.5 ± 1.8 | *** 3.9 ± 0.9 | *** 1.8 ± 1.7 | 29.5 ± 0.8 | *** 4.7 ± 2.4 |
| Late Apoptosis | 4.7 ± 2.1 | 4.7 ± 1.9 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 3 ± 1.8 | 6.6 ± 1.0 | 2.5 ± 0.5 |
| Necrosis | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 1.8 | 2.3 ± 0.9 |
Note: (*) Referred to significant difference when compared to the positive control treated with CPT, where ***(P < 0.001)
Fig. 2Effects of crude BSEO on T cell proliferation. Data represented the mean percentages of CD3+CD71+ T cells (± SD) co-cultured with stimulated DCs as determined using MLR assay. Results were performed from five independent experiments. Mean was significant when compared to LPS-stimulated DCs (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)
Percentages of FITC-dextran uptake by stimulated DCs. Data are collected from three independent experiments
| Treatments | At 37 ° C (Mean ± SD) | At 4 ° C (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Mature DCs (LPS) | 18.5 ± 9.0*** | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| Immature DCs (No-LPS) | 64.34 ± 10.7 | 0.7 ± 0.5 |
| VIT-D3 | 68.73 ± 7.4 | 0.7 ± 0.7 |
| BSEO-5 | 55.1 ± 5.0 | 0.7 ± 0.7 |
| BSEO-10 | 60.8 ± 11.0 | 0.4 ± 0.4 |
Note: (*) Referred to significant value compared to the control immature DCs (0.1% DMSO-treated DCs), where ***P < 0.001
Levels of IL-10 and IL-12p70 cytokines. DCs cultures supernatant were assessed for cytokines production upon stimulation with different stimulant including BSEO as determined by ELISA technique. Data are collected from five independent experiments
| Treatments | IL-10 pg/mL ± SD | IL-12p70 pg/mL ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 65.3 ± 22.7 | 7.4 ± 1.7••• |
| LPS | 254.3 ± 153.5 *** | 318.7 ± 70.4 |
| VIT-D3 | 265 ± 113.2 *** | 10.4 ± 1.6••• |
| BSEO-5 | 257 ± 101.5 *** | 8.4 ± 3.7••• |
| BSEO-10 | 272.3 ± 50.4 *** | 10.1 ± 2.4••• |
(*) Referred to significant difference compared to the control, where *** (P < 0.001)
(•) Referred to significant difference compared to LPS treated cells, where ••• (P < 0.001)
Fig. 3Total ion GC-MS chromatogram of characterized volatile compounds of Boswellia sacra resin oil extracted by hydro-distillation
Compounds determined in the oil of Boswellia sacra resin extracted by hydro-distillation
| TIME | Relative % | Compound name | Structure | Biological activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.14 | 4.91 | α-Copaene | Anti-inflammatory activities [ | |
| 13.13 | 5.33 | (−)-β-Elemene |
| Anti-cancer and anti-angiogenic activities [ |
| 14.21 | 20.58 | β-Caryophyllene |
| Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects [ |
| 16.56 | 2.04 | 4-Terpinenol |
| Antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antineoplastic activity [ |
| 16.68 | 4.55 | Humulene (α-Caryophyllene) |
| Topical and systemic anti-inflammatory properties [ |
| 16.96 | 9.51 | (+)-δ-Cadinene |
| Anti malarial anti-microbial properties [ |
| 17.03 | 2.4 | α-Selinene |
| Anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic activity [ |
| 17.17 | 2.11 | γ-Cadinene |
| Antioxidant properties [ |
| 17.59 | 6.39 | β-Cubebene |
| Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [ |
| 18.49 | 2.69 | cis-Verbenol |
| Anti-ischemic and anti-inflammatory activity {Choi, 2010 #74} |
| 26.79 | 3.3 | γ-Muurolene |
| Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities [ |
| 30.44 | 5.2 | L-Elemol |
| Anti-inflammatory activities [ |
| 31.91 | 3 | tau-Cadinol |
| Antimicrobial activity {Ho, 2011 #68} |