| Literature DB >> 33212930 |
Larissa T Volova1, Evgeniy I Pugachev1, Victoria V Rossinskaya1, Violetta V Boltovskaya1, Dmitry A Dolgushkin1, Natalya Ossina1.
Abstract
In the context of modern drug discovery, there is an obvious advantage to designing phenotypic bioassays based on human disease-relevant cells that express disease-relevant markers. The specific aim of the study was to develop a convenient and reliable method for screening compounds with Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitory activity. This assay was developed using cryopreserved ready-to-use cartilage-derived cells isolated from juvenile donors diagnosed with polydactyly. It has been demonstrated that all donor (10 donors) cells were able to respond to TNF-α treatment by increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 into subcultural medium. Inhibition of TNF-α using commercially available TNF-α inhibitor etanercept resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in IL-6 production which was measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). TNF-α dependent IL-6 production was detected in the cells after both their prolonged cultivation in vitro (≥20 passages) and cryopreservation. This phenotypic bioassay based on ready-to-use primary human cells was developed for detection of novel TNF-α inhibitory compounds and profiling of biosimilar drugs.Entities:
Keywords: cartilage; interleukin-6; primary cell culture; rheumatoid arthritis; tumor necrosis factor assay
Year: 2020 PMID: 33212930 PMCID: PMC7698400 DOI: 10.3390/biom10111563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Design of the ready-to-use cell bioassay. Master and working cell banks could be obtained in advance of screening. Immature cartilaginous one-donor cells, which have been validated for quality (master cell bank), can be expanded and stored in liquid nitrogen (working cell bank) and then used routinely over extended periods of time for bioassays.
Figure 2TNF-α-mediated expression of IL-6 by cartilaginous cells. (a) Cells were primed with serum deprivation for 24 h (contr.) and then treated with TNF-α alone (TNFα) or together with etanercept (T+E). During drug discovery screening, etanercept could be replaced by novel compounds. (b) Dose-dependent inhibition of IL-6 expression by TNF-α inhibitor etanercept. Cells were treated with 10 ng/mL TNF-α (TNFα) alone or together with etanercept (T+E) at concentrations from 0.01 to 100 ng/mL.
ILl-6 expression by cells from different donors.
| Donors | Control 1 | TNF-α 2 | TNF-α+E 3 |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 154.29 ± 4.32 | 371.70 ± 26.91 | 158.15 ± 17.14 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.935 | <0.001 |
| D2 | 47.20 ± 31.48 | 649.21 ± 11.28 | 70.70 ± 25.06 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.750 | 0.012 |
| D3 | 49.85 ± 23.68 | 714.87 ± 84.26 | 85.84 ± 95.79 | 0.005 | 0.074 | 0.929 | 0.043 |
| D4 | 15.24 ± 0.11 | 772.67 ± 94.69 | 31.70 ± 10.06 | <0.001 | 0.011 | 0.212 | 0.011 |
| D5 | 8.24 ± 0.23 | 867.10 ± 214.78 | 18.77 ± 7.14 | 0.001 | 0.042 | 0.251 | 0.043 |
| D6 | 14.55 ± 1.20 | 861.39 ± 124.85 | 14.78 ± 3.78 | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.999 | 0.015 |
| D7 | 75.77 ± 9.91 | 1117.99 ± 9.42 | 88.33 ± 33.93 | <0.001 | 0.045 | 0.933 | 0.020 |
| D8 | 189.68 ± 32.68 | 1320.40 ± 139.69 | 53.09 ± 8.54 | 0.001 | 0.077 | 0.154 | 0.081 |
| D9 | 38.10 ± 6.07 | 1323.68 ± 81.07 | 57.36 ± 27.39 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.633 | 0.001 |
| D10 | 4.11 ± 0.07 | 1483.77 ± 250.76 | 14.84 ± 1.86 | <0.001 | 0.020 | 0.020 | 0.020 |
Group-wise comparisons of the donor’s variables. ANOVA was used to determine significance, post-hoc comparisons were performed using Dunnett T3 test. The values represent mean ± SD. D: donors.
Figure 3Box plot of the TNF-α-mediated expression of IL-6 by cartilaginous cells isolated from 10 donors. Data are from multiple experiments. Horizontal line in the box plot indicates median, low and upper borders of the box are quartiles. IL-6 production was measured in the medium of untreated cells (control), or cells treated with TNF-α (TNF-α) or with mixture of TNF-α and etanercept (T+E). Multiple comparisons (Dunnett T3 test) showed highly significant differences between control and TNF (p < 0.001); between TNF an TNF + E (p < 0.001); no difference between control and TNF + E (p = 0.994).
Figure 4Optimization of ready-to-use cell bioassay. (a) Comparison of IL-6 expression by continuously subcultured in vitro (Passage 22) and cryopreserved (Passage 14) cartilaginous cells from the same donor. (b) TNF-α induced the response of ready-to-use cryopreserved cells due to different thawing conditions. Thawed cells were directly seeded to the wells (DMSO+) or washed out of DMSO by centrifugation before seeding (DMSO-). (c) MTT viability test. Cells were incubated in media with serum (10% serum) and no serum (0% serum) for 24 h. Serum-deprived cells were treated with TNF-α alone (TNFα) or with mixture of TNF-α and etanercept (T+E). (d) Comparison of IL-6 expression by cartilaginous cells primed with serum deprivation for 24 h and 2 h.