| Literature DB >> 33212168 |
Cristina Avonto1, Amar G Chittiboyina2, Shabana I Khan3, Olivia R Dale2, Jon F Parcher2, Mei Wang2, Ikhlas A Khan3.
Abstract
Oakmoss and treemoss absolutes are the major natural extracts of concern as potential sources of skin sensitizers in cosmetics and personal care products (PCP). Two single constituents, atranol and chloroatranol, have been identified as primary culprits in both lichens, and industrial self-regulation has been proposed to limit their contents to less than 100 ppm. Nonetheless, evidence points to the presence of additional candidate skin sensitizers in these multicomponent extracts. These observations, along with a lack of data from non-animal alternative methods and the chemical variability of commercial absolutes, prompted further investigation of oakmoss absolute along with altranol-like compounds in these extracts. The major chemical constituents of a commercial sample were identified by two independent analytical techniques, GC-MS and HPLC-DAD-MS. The crude oakmoss extract and pure compounds were assayed with two in chemico methods (HTS-DCYA and DPRA) to gauge their chemical reactivity. Activation of inflammatory responses in vitro was also investigated by KeratinoSens™ and human cell line activation tests (h-CLAT). Based on weight of evidence, orcinol, ethyl orsellinate, and usnic acid were classified as candidate sensitizers, along with both atranols and oakmoss extract.Entities:
Keywords: DPRA; HTS-DCYA; KeratinoSens; Non-animal alternative methods; Oakmoss absolutes; Skin sensitization; h-CLAT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33212168 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol In Vitro ISSN: 0887-2333 Impact factor: 3.500