Literature DB >> 33211680

COVID-19 Outbreak - New York City, February 29-June 1, 2020.

Corinne N Thompson1, Jennifer Baumgartner1, Carolina Pichardo1, Brian Toro1, Lan Li1, Robert Arciuolo1, Pui Ying Chan1, Judy Chen1, Gretchen Culp1, Alexander Davidson1, Katelynn Devinney1, Alan Dorsinville1, Meredith Eddy1, Michele English1, Ana Maria Fireteanu1, Laura Graf1, Anita Geevarughese1, Sharon K Greene1, Kevin Guerra1, Mary Huynh1, Christina Hwang1, Maryam Iqbal1, Jillian Jessup1, Jillian Knorr1, Ramona Lall1, Julia Latash1, Ellen Lee1, Kristen Lee1, Wenhui Li1, Robert Mathes1, Emily McGibbon1, Natasha McIntosh1, Matthew Montesano1, Miranda S Moore1, Kenya Murray1, Stephanie Ngai1, Marc Paladini1, Rachel Paneth-Pollak1, Hilary Parton1, Eric Peterson1, Renee Pouchet1, Jyotsna Ramachandran1, Kathleen Reilly1, Jennifer Sanderson Slutsker1, Gretchen Van Wye1, Amanda Wahnich1, Ann Winters1, Marcelle Layton1, Lucretia Jones1, Vasudha Reddy1, Anne Fine1.   

Abstract

New York City (NYC) was an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United States during spring 2020 (1). During March-May 2020, approximately 203,000 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were reported to the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). To obtain more complete data, DOHMH used supplementary information sources and relied on direct data importation and matching of patient identifiers for data on hospitalization status, the occurrence of death, race/ethnicity, and presence of underlying medical conditions. The highest rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were concentrated in communities of color, high-poverty areas, and among persons aged ≥75 years or with underlying conditions. The crude fatality rate was 9.2% overall and 32.1% among hospitalized patients. Using these data to prevent additional infections among NYC residents during subsequent waves of the pandemic, particularly among those at highest risk for hospitalization and death, is critical. Mitigating COVID-19 transmission among vulnerable groups at high risk for hospitalization and death is an urgent priority. Similar to NYC, other jurisdictions might find the use of supplementary information sources valuable in their efforts to prevent COVID-19 infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211680      PMCID: PMC7676643          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


New York City (NYC) was an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United States during spring 2020 (). During March–May 2020, approximately 203,000 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were reported to the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). To obtain more complete data, DOHMH used supplementary information sources and relied on direct data importation and matching of patient identifiers for data on hospitalization status, the occurrence of death, race/ethnicity, and presence of underlying medical conditions. The highest rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were concentrated in communities of color, high-poverty areas, and among persons aged ≥75 years or with underlying conditions. The crude fatality rate was 9.2% overall and 32.1% among hospitalized patients. Using these data to prevent additional infections among NYC residents during subsequent waves of the pandemic, particularly among those at highest risk for hospitalization and death, is critical. Mitigating COVID-19 transmission among vulnerable groups at high risk for hospitalization and death is an urgent priority. Similar to NYC, other jurisdictions might find the use of supplementary information sources valuable in their efforts to prevent COVID-19 infections. This report describes cases of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among NYC residents diagnosed during February 29–June 1, 2020, that were reported to DOHMH. DOHMH began COVID-19 surveillance in January 2020 when testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) using real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was limited by strict testing criteria because of limited test availability only through CDC. The NYC and New York State public health laboratories began testing hospitalized patients at the end of February and early March. DOHMH encouraged patients with mild symptoms to remain at home rather than seek health care because of shortages of personal protective equipment and laboratory tests at hospitals and clinics. Commercial laboratories began testing for SARS-CoV-2 in mid- to late March. During February 29–March 15, patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were interviewed by DOHMH, and close contacts were identified for monitoring. The rapid rise in laboratory-confirmed cases (cases) quickly made interviewing all patients, as well as contact tracing, unsustainable. Subsequent case investigations first included medical chart review for patients who were hospitalized or who had died, but then progressed to chart review only for patients who had died, and then finally only for deaths in patients aged <65 years. On April 14, DOHMH began to report probable COVID-19–associated deaths (i.e., no known positive SARS-CoV-2 test result and death certificate listing cause of death as COVID-19 or an equivalent term [e.g., COVID, SARS-CoV-2, or another term]). DOHMH quickly recognized the need for supplementary information sources and relied on direct data importation and matching of patient identifiers for data on hospitalization status, the occurrence of death, race/ethnicity, and presence of underlying medical conditions, including diabetes, lung disease, cancer, immunodeficiency, heart disease, asthma, kidney disease, gastrointestinal/liver disease, and obesity. These supplementary data systems included emergency department syndromic surveillance, the New York State Hospital Emergency Response Data System, regional health information organizations, NYC public hospitals, DOHMH’s electronic death registry system, and remote access to hospitals’ electronic health record systems. Even with these supplementary data sources, many variables (e.g., race/ethnicity) were still incomplete, given variable data quality. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute). Age-adjusted rates were calculated using direct standardization for age and weighting by the U.S. 2000 standard population (). Crude rates of cumulative cases, deaths, and testing per 100,000 population were mapped by modified U.S. Census Bureau ZIP code tabulation area* using ArcGIS software (version 10.6.1; ESRI). Neighborhood-level poverty was defined as the percentage of residents within a ZIP code with household incomes <100% of the federal poverty level, per the American Community Survey 2013–2017 (low: <10%, medium: 10%–19.9%, high: 20%–29.9%, very high: ≥30%). Population estimates (for 2018) for age, sex, borough (county) of residence, racial/ethnic group, and neighborhood poverty were produced by DOHMH using U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimate Program files (unpublished data, NYC DOHMH, 2020). During February 29–June 1, 2020, a total of 203,792 COVID-19 cases were diagnosed and reported among residents of NYC, including 54,211 (26.6%) in persons known to have been hospitalized and 18,679 (9.2%) in persons who died. The age-adjusted cumulative citywide incidences were 2,263 cases, 582 hospitalizations, and 198 deaths per 100,000 population. Case counts increased rapidly from a weekly mean of 274 diagnosed cases per day during the week of March 8 to a peak weekly mean of 5,132 cases per day by the week of March 29 (Figure 1). Hospital admissions also peaked the week of March 29 (weekly mean = 1,566 admissions per day). Deaths peaked during the week of April 5 (weekly mean = 566 per day). The median duration of hospitalization was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 3–11 days). Among decedents with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, the median interval from diagnosis to death was 8 days (IQR = 4–16 days). Among hospitalized patients, 32.1% were known to have died. The weekly proportion of hospitalized patients who died was highest among those admitted during March 22–April 5 (mean = 36.4%; range = 33.5%–38.2%).
FIGURE 1

Daily laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases, associated hospitalizations, and deaths — New York City, February 29–June 1, 2020

Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

Daily laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases, associated hospitalizations, and deaths — New York City, February 29–June 1, 2020 Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019. Age-specific incidence was highest among adults aged 45–64 years (7,007 per 100,000) (Table). Hospitalization and death rates were highest among patients aged ≥75 years (2,146 and 1,311 per 100,000, respectively); among persons aged ≥75 years with confirmed cases, 38.3% were known to have died. Age-adjusted incidence, hospitalization rate, and death rate were higher among males than females, and all increased with increasing levels of neighborhood poverty. By borough, age-adjusted incidence, hospitalization rate, and death rate were consistently highest in the Bronx and lowest in Manhattan. Among the race/ethnicity groups with known identity, incidence was highest among Black/African American (Black) persons (1,590 per 100,000). Age-adjusted rates of hospitalization and death were highest among Black (699 and 248 per 100,000, respectively) and Hispanic/Latino (Hispanic) persons (658 and 260 per 100,000, respectively).
TABLE

Characteristics of cumulative laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among New York City residents reported to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene — New York City, February 29–June 1, 2020*

CharacteristicCases
Hospitalizations
Deaths
No.RateNo. (row %)RateNo. (row %)Rate
Total
203,792
2,263
54,211 (26.6)
582
18,679 (9.2)
198
Age group, yrs
0–17
6,016
348
508 (8.4)
29
12 (0.2)
1
18–44
74,654
2,215
8,474 (11.4)
251
686 (0.9)
20
45–64
73,998
7,007
18,219 (24.6)
1,725
4,183 (5.7)
396
65–74
25,182
2,518
12,009 (47.7)
1,201
4,634 (18.4)
463
≥75
23,942
3,425
15,001 (62.7)
2,146
9,164 (38.3)
1,311
Sex
Female
98,992
2,060
23,612 (23.9)
456
7,494 (7.6)
136
Male
104,675
2,511
30,589 (29.2)
744
11,183 (10.7)
283
Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino
36,498
1,514
15,288 (41.9)
658
5,743 (15.7)
260
Black/African American
32,458
1,590
14,676 (45.2)
699
5,215 (16.1)
248
White
31,029
988
11,057 (35.6)
314
4,745 (15.3)
123
Asian/Pacific Islander
8,122
601
3,441 (42.4)
258
1,403 (17.3)
111
American Indian/Alaska Native
196
973
33 (16.8)
168
5 (2.6)
27
Other race/Missing
95,489
§
9,716 (10.2)
§
1,568 (1.6)
§
Neighborhood poverty
Low
33,114
1,787
7,498 (22.6)
358
2,756 (8.3)
125
Medium
79,327
2,169
20,907 (26.4)
551
7,404 (9.3)
193
High
48,998
2,315
15,034 (30.7)
700
5,184 (10.6)
241
Very high
36,642
2,706
10,341 (28.2)
796
3,305 (9)
268
Borough of residence
Bronx
46,085
3,157
12,076 (26.2)
826
3,870 (8.4)
268
Brooklyn
56,548
2,104
15,125 (26.7)
556
5,563 (9.8)
205
Manhattan
25,315
1,369
7,867 (31.1)
408
2,476 (9.8)
123
Queens
62,260
2,507
16,806 (27)
637
5,882 (9.4)
217
Staten Island13,5772,7012,337 (17.2)423888 (6.5)158

Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

* Data missing on sex for 138 persons, on borough for nine persons, and on neighborhood poverty for 6,660 persons.

† Per 100,000 population; rates for sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood poverty, and borough of residence were age-adjusted.

§ Rates not calculated because no population denominator.

¶ Neighborhood-level poverty was defined as the percentage of residents in a ZIP code with household incomes <100% of the federal poverty level, per the American Community Survey 2013–2017. Low poverty: <10%; medium poverty: 10%–19.9%; high poverty: 20%–29.9%; very high poverty: ≥30%.

Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019. * Data missing on sex for 138 persons, on borough for nine persons, and on neighborhood poverty for 6,660 persons. † Per 100,000 population; rates for sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood poverty, and borough of residence were age-adjusted. § Rates not calculated because no population denominator. ¶ Neighborhood-level poverty was defined as the percentage of residents in a ZIP code with household incomes <100% of the federal poverty level, per the American Community Survey 2013–2017. Low poverty: <10%; medium poverty: 10%–19.9%; high poverty: 20%–29.9%; very high poverty: ≥30%. Some neighborhoods with high case rates also had high testing rates (e.g., North Bronx and Northwest Queens) (Figure 2). However, other neighborhoods had low or medium testing rates and high percent positivity with medium to high case rates (Southeast Queens, East Brooklyn, West Bronx, and Northern Manhattan), suggesting possible underascertainment of cases. Citywide, the percentage of tests with positive results increased from 27% the week of March 8 to a peak of 65% during the week of March 22. The growth of testing rates lagged behind the growth of percent positivity but increased steadily from 86 per 100,000 during the week of March 8 to 1,634 per 100,000 by the week of May 24.
FIGURE 2

Cumulative crude rates of COVID-19 testing per 100,000 population, percentage of tests positive for SARS-CoV-2, and cumulative crude rates of COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population,* by modified ZIP code tabulation areas — New York City, February 29–June 1, 2020

Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

* All data are displayed by four levels of natural breaks.

Cumulative crude rates of COVID-19 testing per 100,000 population, percentage of tests positive for SARS-CoV-2, and cumulative crude rates of COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population,* by modified ZIP code tabulation areas — New York City, February 29–June 1, 2020 Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019. * All data are displayed by four levels of natural breaks. Among 85% of decedents with known underlying medical conditions, the majority (75%) of decedents with a confirmed laboratory test had two or more underlying conditions; heart disease (73%), diabetes (58%), and chronic kidney disease (23%) were the most commonly reported conditions (NYC DOHMH, unpublished data; 2020). During March 11–June 1, 4,516 probable COVID-19–associated deaths were known to have occurred among NYC residents. These deaths occurred more commonly at home (30%) or in a nursing home (26%), compared with confirmed COVID-19 deaths (4% at home and 8% in a nursing home). Deaths occurring in a hospital were frequently laboratory-confirmed as COVID-19–associated (86%). Among 23,195 probable and confirmed deaths, 22.5% (5,226) were known to have occurred among residents of a nursing home.

Discussion

Phylogenetic analysis and sentinel surveillance suggest that the introduction of COVID-19 into NYC from travelers started during early to mid-February 2020 (,), although the first case of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in NYC was diagnosed on February 29. The subsequent 3-month period was characterized by a rapid acceleration in the epidemic, resulting in approximately 203,000 cases and 18,600 deaths among persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Reported diagnoses of cases peaked 1 week after physical distancing orders were enacted (March 22). The overall crude case fatality rate of 9.2% is an overestimate because of underascertainment of cases, given the restrictive testing guidance and limited availability of tests for the first 2 months of the epidemic. Similar to findings from the United Kingdom,** approximately 30% of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were known to have died. The increased case fatality rate among hospitalized patients during the peak period of reported cases suggests that health care system capacity constraints might have influenced patient outcomes. As has been previously reported (), COVID-19 incidence and related hospitalization and mortality were elevated among Black and Hispanic persons and among residents of high-poverty neighborhoods. The finding of neighborhoods with low testing rates and a high percentage of positive test results suggests barriers to accessing testing in areas with considerable community transmission. The rapid spread of COVID-19, combined with a lack of testing availability early in 2020, led to considerable surveillance challenges. DOHMH quickly ceased labor-intensive individual case investigations for all patients and sought supplementary sources of information. In addition, publishing NYC DOHMH data online in real-time allowed the public to access basic and important information on COVID-19 in NYC. The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, these data are based primarily on laboratory-confirmed disease, which is more likely to represent severe illness, especially early in the epidemic when COVID-19 testing was mostly limited to hospitalized patients. Second, hospitalizations were underestimated because of incomplete ascertainment from external sources. Third, race and ethnicity information was missing for a large proportion of nonhospitalized, nonfatal cases. Finally, rates are likely underestimated for more affluent neighborhoods because denominators do not reflect the differential exodus of wealthy NYC residents (). The initial wave of COVID-19 in NYC demonstrated that persons who were older, had underlying medical conditions, or resided in poorer neighborhoods, and racial and ethnic minority populations suffered disproportionately from SARS-Cov-2 infection and death. These trends represent the downstream effect of long-term policies, practices, attitudes, and cultural messages that promote, reinforce, and fail to eliminate inequities (). In addition, Black and Hispanic persons are disproportionately employed in lower-paid, often frontline industries and occupations, work with limited ability to social distance, and are more likely to lack employer-based health insurance (). Mitigating future morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 across NYC in the absence of a vaccine, particularly among persons who are at increased risk, is an urgent priority.

What is already known about this topic?

New York City (NYC) was an early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

What is added by this report?

Approximately 203,000 cases of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were reported in NYC during the first 3 months of the pandemic. The crude fatality rate among confirmed cases was 9.2% overall and 32.1% among hospitalized patients. Incidence, hospitalization rates, and mortality were highest among Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino persons, as well as those who were living in neighborhoods with high poverty, aged ≥75 years, and with underlying medical conditions.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Mitigating COVID-19 transmission among vulnerable groups at high risk for hospitalization and death is an urgent priority.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.

Authors:  Zinzi D Bailey; Nancy Krieger; Madina Agénor; Jasmine Graves; Natalia Linos; Mary T Bassett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  COVID-19 and Racial/Ethnic Disparities.

Authors:  Monica Webb Hooper; Anna María Nápoles; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 157.335

3.  Introductions and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the New York City area.

Authors:  Ana S Gonzalez-Reiche; Matthew M Hernandez; Emilia Mia Sordillo; Viviana Simon; Harm van Bakel; Mitchell J Sullivan; Brianne Ciferri; Hala Alshammary; Ajay Obla; Shelcie Fabre; Giulio Kleiner; Jose Polanco; Zenab Khan; Bremy Alburquerque; Adriana van de Guchte; Jayeeta Dutta; Nancy Francoeur; Betsaida Salom Melo; Irina Oussenko; Gintaras Deikus; Juan Soto; Shwetha Hara Sridhar; Ying-Chih Wang; Kathryn Twyman; Andrew Kasarskis; Deena R Altman; Melissa Smith; Robert Sebra; Judith Aberg; Florian Krammer; Adolfo García-Sastre; Marta Luksza; Gopi Patel; Alberto Paniz-Mondolfi; Melissa Gitman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Detection and Genetic Characterization of Community-Based SARS-CoV-2 Infections - New York City, March 2020.

Authors:  Dena Bushman; Karen A Alroy; Sharon K Greene; Page Keating; Amanda Wahnich; Don Weiss; Preeti Pathela; Christy Harrison; Jennifer Rakeman; Gayle Langley; Suxiang Tong; Ying Tao; Anna Uehara; Krista Queen; Clinton R Paden; Wendy Szymczak; Erika P Orner; Priya Nori; Phi A Lai; Jessica L Jacobson; Harjot K Singh; David P Calfee; Lars F Westblade; Ljiljana V Vasovic; Jacob H Rand; Dakai Liu; Vishnu Singh; Janice Burns; Nishant Prasad; Jessica Sell
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US.

Authors:  Aaron van Dorn; Rebecca E Cooney; Miriam L Sabin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Geographic Differences in COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Incidence - United States, February 12-April 7, 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 17.586

  6 in total
  82 in total

1.  Ecuador and Covid-19: A pandemic we won't be able to run away from.

Authors:  Gabriel A Molina; Andres V Ayala; Santiago A Endara; William G Aguayo; Christian L Rojas; Galo E Jiménez; Miguel A Moyón; F X Moyón
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Rapid Emergence and Epidemiologic Characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.526 Variant - New York City, New York, January 1-April 5, 2021.

Authors:  Corinne N Thompson; Scott Hughes; Stephanie Ngai; Jennifer Baumgartner; Jade C Wang; Emily McGibbon; Katelynn Devinney; Elizabeth Luoma; Daniel Bertolino; Christina Hwang; Kelsey Kepler; Cybill Del Castillo; Melissa Hopkins; Henry Lee; Andrea K DeVito; Jennifer L Rakeman; Anne D Fine
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Adapting Survey Data Collection to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences From a Local Health Department.

Authors:  Amber Levanon Seligson; Karen A Alroy; Michael Sanderson; Ariana N Maleki; Steven Fernandez; April Aviles; Sarah E Dumas; Sharon E Perlman; Kathryn Peebles; Christina C Norman; R Charon Gwynn; L Hannah Gould
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  COVID contingencies: Early epicenter experiences of different genetics clinics at a New York City institution inform emergency adaptation strategies.

Authors:  Priyanka Ahimaz; Jessica Giordano; Michele Disco; Elizabeth Harrington; Elana Levinson; Erica Spiegel; Carli Andrews; Emily Griffin; Rebecca Hernan; Julia Wynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.717

5.  Correlation of Coagulation Parameters With Clinical Outcomes During the Coronavirus-19 Surge in New York: Observational Cohort.

Authors:  Morayma Reyes Gil; Jesus D Gonzalez-Lugo; Shafia Rahman; Mohammad Barouqa; James Szymanski; Kenji Ikemura; Yungtai Lo; Henny H Billett
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  "I felt useless": a qualitative examination of COVID-19's impact on home-based primary care providers in New York.

Authors:  Ksenia Gorbenko; Emily Franzosa; Sybil Masse; Abraham A Brody; Orla Sheehan; Bruce Kinosian; Christine S Ritchie; Bruce Leff; Jonathan Ripp; Katherine A Ornstein; Alex D Federman
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2021-07-23

7.  Universal SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction screening and assisted reproductive technology in a coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic epicenter: screening and cycle outcomes from a New York City fertility center.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Shaw; Jessica Tozour; Jennifer K Blakemore; James Grifo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.490

8.  Factors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Physician Trainees in New York City during the First COVID-19 Wave.

Authors:  Kate R Pawloski; Betty Kolod; Rabeea F Khan; Vishal Midya; Tania Chen; Adeyemi Oduwole; Bernard Camins; Elena Colicino; I Michael Leitman; Ismail Nabeel; Kristin Oliver; Damaskini Valvi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Do surgical emergencies stay at home? Observations from the first United States Coronavirus epicenter.

Authors:  Caroline T Dong; Anna Liveris; Erin R Lewis; Smita Mascharak; Edward Chao; Srinivas H Reddy; Sheldon H Teperman; John McNelis; Melvin E Stone
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Access and Equity in a Post-COVID Era.

Authors:  Ji E Chang; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Avni Gupta; Ann M Nguyen; Carolyn A Berry; Donna R Shelley
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.