Literature DB >> 33211289

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is the surgery still safe beyond the 7-day barrier? A multicentric observational study.

Marcello Di Martino1, Ismael Mora-Guzmán2,3, Víctor Vaello Jodra4, Alfonso Sanjuanbenito Dehesa4, Dieter Morales-García5, Rubén Caiña Ruiz5, Francisca García-Moreno Nisa6, Fernando Mendoza-Moreno6, Sara Alonso Batanero7, José Edecio Quiñones Sampedro7, Paola Lora Cumplido8, Altea Arango Bravo8, Ines Rubio-Perez9, Luis Asensio-Gomez9, Fernando Pardo Aranda10, Sara Sentí I Farrarons10, Cristina Ruiz Moreno11, Clara Maria Martinez Moreno11, Aingeru Sarriugarte Lasarte12, Mikel Prieto Calvo12, Daniel Aparicio-Sánchez13, Eduardo Perea Del Pozo13, Elena Martin-Perez2.   

Abstract

Timing for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is still controversial. This study assesses ELC for ACC with delayed presentation, according to hospital volume. Multicentric retrospective analysis of 1868 ELC. Patients were classified into two groups according to the timing of surgery from clinical onset and centre volume. Group 1 (G1) within the first 7 days, group 2 (G2) beyond that. Then centres were classified in low volume centres (LVC) and higher volume centres (HVC) according to the number of ELC performed per year. Overall, G2 showed increased conversion rate (17.7% vs 10.7%; p = 0.004), intraoperative complications (7.3% vs 2.9%; p = 0.001); postoperative haemorrhage (3.6% vs 0.8%; p < 0.001), infections (16.6% vs 9.3%; p = 0.003) and global complications (27.6% vs 19.8%; p = 0.011). HVC in comparison with LVC presented decreased conversion rate (17.1% vs 7.6%; p < 0.001), intraoperative bleeding (2.1% vs 1%; p = 0.047), postoperative bile leakage (4.1% vs 2.1%; p = 0.011), infectious (13.7% vs 7.5%; p < 0.001) and global complications (25.7% vs 17.1%; p < 0.001). HVC did not show an increase in any of the above-mentioned outcomes when G1 and G2 were compared. ELC must be indicated cautiously in patients with ACC and more than 1 week of symptom duration. It should be performed in centres with sufficient experience in the management of this disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute cholecystitis; Cholecystectomy; Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Gallblader disorder; Gallstone

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33211289     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00924-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Valerie Halpin
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-08-20

2.  Consistency of ASA grading.

Authors:  J P Little
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? Conclusions of a controlled trial.

Authors:  Francisco J González-Rodríguez; Jesús P Paredes-Cotoré; Cristina Pontón; Yago Rojo; Enrique Flores; Eva San Luis-Calo; Francisco Barreiro-Morandeira; José A Punal; Aquilino Fernández; Ana Paulos; Fernando Santos; Miguel Cainzos
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Wound drains after incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Victoria B Allen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-17

5.  Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Is the Surgery Still Safe beyond the 7-Day Barrier?

Authors:  Ismael Mora-Guzmán; Marcello Di Martino; Alvaro Gancedo Quintana; Elena Martin-Perez
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.